In 1993 the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) formally introduced “Clinical Audit” as a quality improvement process. The idea was to improve patient care and outcomes by reviewing (i.e. auditing) current performance of, for example, a department against explicit criteria and implementing changes where necessary. In simple words, the key component of audit is to ensure that what should be done is being done; and if not it provides a framework to enable improvements to be made.
KeywordsNational Health Service Clinical Audit Explicit Criterion Clinical Governance Quality Improvement Process
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (2002) Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Radcliffe Medical Press (http://www.nelh.nhs.uk/BestPracticeClinicalAudit. pdf)Google Scholar
- 2.United Bristol NHS Trust (2005) published at: http://www.ubht.nhs.uk/clinicalaudit/Google Scholar
- 3.Hughes R (2005) Is audit research? The relationship between clinical audit and social research. Int J Health Care Qual Assurance 18:288–299Google Scholar
- 5.Janmohamed F (2006) Student. BMJ 14:20–22Google Scholar
- 7.Grüne F (2004) Working groups and process analysis in hospitals. In: Lauterbach KW, Schrappe M (eds) Gesundheitsökonomie, Qualitätsmanagement und Evidence-based Medicine: eine systematische Einführung. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 388–397Google Scholar
- 8.Jones T, Cawthorn S (2002) What is clinical audit? Evidence based medicine. Hayward Medical Communications. (http://www.evidence-based-medicine.co.uk/ebmfiles/WhatisClinAudit.pdf)Google Scholar
- 9.Copeland G and the Clinical Governance Support Team (2005) A practical handbook for clinical audit. NHS, UK (http://www.cgsupport.nhs.uk/downloads/Practical_Clinical_Audit_Handbook_v1_1.pdf)Google Scholar
- 15.Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT et al (2006) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Apr 19;(2):CD000259Google Scholar