In 1993 the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) formally introduced “Clinical Audit” as a quality improvement process. The idea was to improve patient care and outcomes by reviewing (i.e. auditing) current performance of, for example, a department against explicit criteria and implementing changes where necessary. In simple words, the key component of audit is to ensure that what should be done is being done; and if not it provides a framework to enable improvements to be made.


National Health Service Clinical Audit Explicit Criterion Clinical Governance Quality Improvement Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (2002) Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Radcliffe Medical Press ( pdf)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    United Bristol NHS Trust (2005) published at: Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hughes R (2005) Is audit research? The relationship between clinical audit and social research. Int J Health Care Qual Assurance 18:288–299Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith R (1992) Audit and research. BMJ 305:905–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janmohamed F (2006) Student. BMJ 14:20–22Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnston G, Crombie IK, Davies HT et al (2000) Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit. Qual Health Care 9:23–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grüne F (2004) Working groups and process analysis in hospitals. In: Lauterbach KW, Schrappe M (eds) Gesundheitsökonomie, Qualitätsmanagement und Evidence-based Medicine: eine systematische Einführung. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 388–397Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones T, Cawthorn S (2002) What is clinical audit? Evidence based medicine. Hayward Medical Communications. ( Scholar
  9. 9.
    Copeland G and the Clinical Governance Support Team (2005) A practical handbook for clinical audit. NHS, UK ( Scholar
  10. 10.
    McHugh GA, Thoms GMM (2005) Supervision and responsibility: The Royal College of Anaesthetists National Audit. Br J Anaesth 95:124–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harmer M, Davies KA (1998) The effect of education, assessment and a standardized prescription on postoperative pain management. Anaesthesia 53(5):424–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gallagher GA, McLintock T, Booth MG (2003) Closing the audit loop-prevention of preoperative hypothermia: audit and reaudit of perioperative hypothermia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 20:750–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ursprung R, Gray JE, Edwards WH et al (2005) Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day. Qual Saf Health Care 14:284–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gnanalingham J, Gnanalingham MG, Gnanalingham KK (2001) An audit of audits: are we completing the cycle? J R Soc Med 94:288–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT et al (2006) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Apr 19;(2):CD000259Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Klimek
    • 1
  • F. Grüne
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnaesthesiologyErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations