Diagnosis of Hemangiomas

  • Juan Carlos López Gutiérrez


Diagnosis of hemangiomas is based first on the medical history. The presence of a lesion at birth supports a diagnosis of a vascular malformation or congenital hemangioma. Infantile hemangiomas are characterized by an initial rapid proliferation phase in the first 6–9 months of life, followed by a slow involution phase and, in many cases, complete regression. Physical examination should allow a hemangioma to be classified as superficial, deep, or mixed type. On imaging, Doppler ultrasound (US) can assess the flow dynamics of a hemangioma, but the most important tool is contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which demonstrates the extent of the lesion and can help to differentiate between a hemangioma and another disorder. The type of lesion can usually be determined based on the physical examination and Doppler US. MRI is mostly useful for confirming the clinical diagnosis, estimating the extent of the lesion, and determining the feasibility of surgical resection. If the diagnosis is in question after a thorough history, physical examination and radiological findings, a skin biopsy can be helpful in distinguishing unusual or atypical hemangiomas from other vascular lesions.


Cavernous Hemangioma Infantile Hemangioma Magnetic Resonance Imaging Show Congenital Hemangioma Infantile Myofibromatosis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hand JL, Frieden IJ (2002) Vascular birthmarks of infancy: resolving nosologic confusion. Am J Med Genet 108:257–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiller KG, Passaro D, Frieden IJ (2002) Hemangiomas of infancy: clinical characteristics, morphologic subtypes, and their relationship to race, ethnicity, and sex. Arch Dermatol 138:1567–1576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boon LM, Enjolras O, Mulliken JB (1996) Congenital hemangioma: evidence of accelerated involution. J Pediatr 128:329–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Baselga E et al (2006) Prospective study of infantile hemangiomas: clinical characteristics predicting complications and treatment. Pediatrics 118(3):882–887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frieden IJ, Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA et al (2005) Infantile hemangiomas: current knowledge, future directions. Proceedings of a research workshop on infantile hemangiomas, April 7–9, 2005, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Pediatr Dermatol 22(5):383–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frieden I, Enjolras O, Esterly N (2003) Vascular birthmarks and other abnormalities of blood vessels and lymphatics. In: Schacner LA, Hansen RC (eds) Pediatric dermatology, 3rd edn, Mosby Publishers, St Louis, pp 833–862Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burrows PE, Laor T, Paltiel H, Robertson RL (1998) Diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of vascular birthmarks. Dermatol Clin 16:455–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    North PE, Waner M, Mizeracki A, Mihm MC Jr (2000) GLUT1: a newly discovered immunohistochemical marker for juvenile hemangiomas. Hum Pathol 31:11–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Carlos López Gutiérrez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Surgery, La Paz Children’s HospitalAutonomous University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations