Equipment and examination technique

  • Fabio Martino
  • Enzo Silvestri
  • Walter Grassi
  • Giacomo Garlaschi
  • Marco Falchi
  • Alessandro Muda


Ultrasound (US) is one of the best imaging techniques in musculoskeletal radiology because it is low in cost, has high spatial resolution, wide availability in hospitals, is well-tolerated by patients and is not biologically invasive, as it uses sound waves and non ionizing radiation, as in conventional radiology or computed tomography (CT). These features make ultrasound the ideal technique for the diagnosis and follow up of many pathologies and rheumatic syndromes and for the evaluation of the effects of therapy


Rotator Cuff Ultrasound Beam Power Doppler Sonography Ultrasound Equipment Reverberation Artifact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bude RO, Rubin JM ( 1996) Power Doppler sonography. Radiology 200:21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breidahl WH, Newman JS, Toljanovic MS, Adler RS (1996) Power Doppler sonography in the assessment of musculoskeletal fluid collections. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1443–1446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rubin JM (1994) Spectral Doppler US. RadioGraphics 14:139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klauser A, Demharten J, DeMarchi A et al (2005) Contrast enhanced gray-scale sonography in assessment of joint vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis: result from the IACUS study group. Eur Radiol 15:2404–2410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salaffi F, Carotti M, Manganelli P et al (2004) Contrastenhanced power Doppler sonography of knee synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of therapeutic response. Clin Rheumatol 23:285–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin EC, Middleton WD, Teefey SA (1999) Extended field of view sonography in musculoskeletal imaging. J ultrasound Med 18:147–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barberie JE, Wong AD, Cooperberg PL, Carson BW (1998) Extended field of view sonography in musculoskeletal disorders. AJR 171:751–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    VanHolsbeeck MT, Introcaso JH (2001) Musculoskeletal ultrasound, 2nd edition. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K (1999) Shoulder sonography: state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 37:767–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Derchi LE (1999) Tendon and nerve sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 37:691–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silvestri E, Martinoli C, Derchi LE et al (1995) Echotexture of peripheral nerves: correlation between US and histologic findings and criteria to differentiate tendons. Radiology 197:291–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Pastorino C et al (1993) Analysis of echotexture of tendons with US. Radiology 186:839–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silvestri E, LaPaglia E, Avanzino C, Satragno L (2000) Hochauflosende Sonographie der Sehnen, Bander, peripheren Nerven und Muskeln: Eine neue Anatomie. Osterreichische Rontgen gesellschaft, pp 15–18Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Johnson J (2004) Diagnostic Ultrasound, 3rd edition. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kremkau FW (1990) Chapter 4: Doppler effect. In: Doppler ultrasound: principles and instruments. W.B. SaundersGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newman JS, Adler RS, Bude RO, Rubin JM (1994) Detection of soft-tissue hyperemia: value of power Doppler sonography. AJR 163:385–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kane D, Grassi W, Sturrock R, Balint PV (2004) Musculoskeletal ultrasound-a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 2: Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Rheumatology 43:829–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kane DJ, Balint PV, Sturrock R, Grassi W (2004) Musculoskeletal ultrasound — a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 1: Current controversies and issues in the development of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Rheumatology 43:823–828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wakefield RJ, Brown AK, Emery P (2003) Power Doppler sonography: improving disease activity assessment in inflammatory joint disease. Arthritis Rheum 48:285–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL et al (1994) Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. Radiology 190:853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carotti M, Salaffi F, DeBernardis S, Argalia G (2000) Color Power Doppler e mezzi di contrasta nello studio della membrana sinoviale del ginocchio nell’artrite reumatoide. Progressi in Reumatologia 6(vol I):63–75Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eggermont AM (2005) Evolving imaging technology: contrast enhanced Doppler ultrasound is early and rapid predictor of tumors response. Ann Oncol 16:1054–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Martino
    • 1
  • Enzo Silvestri
    • 2
  • Walter Grassi
    • 3
  • Giacomo Garlaschi
    • 4
  • Marco Falchi
    • 5
  • Alessandro Muda
    • 6
  1. 1.Giovanni XXIII-Policlinico HospitalBariItaly
  2. 2.Department of RadiologySan Martino HospitalGenoaItaly
  3. 3.Jesi Medical CenterUniversity Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  4. 4.University of GenoaItaly
  5. 5.Department of RadiologySan Martino HospitalGenoaItaly
  6. 6.Department of RadiologySan Martino HospitalGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations