Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnosi strumentale dell’osteoporosi

  • Chapter
Osteoporosi: le nuove prospettive in ortopedia e traumatologia

Part of the book series: Corsi di perfezionamento in ortopedia e traumatologia ((CORSI))

  • 386 Accesses

Estratto

L’osteoporosi è la malattia dell’osso più comune nella pratica dinica. La sua incidenza aumenta con l’età sino ad interessare la maggior parte della popolazione oltre l’ottava decade di vita. Negli Stati Uniti ne sono affetti oltre 25 milioni di persone [1, 2], mentre in Italia si stima che ci siano oggi, circa 3,5 milioni di donne ed 1 milione di uomini affetti da osteoporosi. Poiché nei prossimi 20 anni la percentuale della popolazione italiana al di sopra dei 65 anni d’età aumenterà del 25%, ci si deve attendere un proporzionale incremento dell’incidenza dell’osteoporosi. Il rischio di andare incontro ad una frattura su base osteoporotica a carico del radio, dei corpi vertebrali o del femore prossimale è di circa il 15% per ogni sito sopraelencato e raggiunge il 40% per un qualsiasi sito.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Kushner P (1998) Osteoporosis: unmasking the silent epidemic. Hosp Med 34: 25–26, 32–34, 37–39

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bengner U, Johnell O, Redlund-Jhonell I (1988) Changes in incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures during 30 years. Calcif Tissue Int. 42:293–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chrischilles EA, Butler CD, Davis CS, Wallace RB (1991) A model of lifetime osteoporosis impact. Arch Intern Med 151:2026–2032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings Sr (1997) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev 19:244–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Riis BJ, Hansen NA, Jensen AM et al (1996) Low bone mass and fast rate of bone loss at menopause: equal risk factors for future fracture: a 15 years follow-up study. Bone 19:9–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cummings Sr, Black DM, Nevit MC et al (1993) Bone density at various site for prediction of hip fracture. Lancet 141:72–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramzi RH, Osam KK (2004) Osteoporosis for the Home Care Physician, part 1: etiology and current diagnostic strategies. J Am Med Dir Assoc 5:192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diez F (2002) Guide lines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis by densitometric methods. J of Man and Physiol Therap 25:403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measure of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. Br Med J 312:1254–1259

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodgson SF, Johnston CC (1996) AACE Clinical practice guide-lines for the prevention and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Developed by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larcos G (1998) Predicting clinical discordance of bone mineral density. Mayo Clin Proc 73:824–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith J, Shoukri K (2000) Diagnosis of osteoporosis. Clin Cornerston 2:22–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cosman F, Herrington B, Himmelstein S et al (1991) Radiographic absorptiometry. A simple method for determination of bone mass. Osteoporos Int 2:34–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Organization Mondiale de la Santè (1994) Èvaluation du risqué de fracture et son application au dèpistage de ostèoporose post-mènopausique. Genève: OMS

    Google Scholar 

  15. Campailla E, Mastidoro L, Causero A, Focolari G (1996) Markers biochimici di turnover osseo. In: L’osteoporosi e la sua diagnosi sonografica. Ed. Nuovagrafica Carpi

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA et al (1998) Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  17. Finkelstein JS, Cleary LR, Butler JP et al (1994) A comparison of laterale versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:724–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers BS, Arbogast KB, Lobaugh B et al (1984) Improved assessment of lumbar vertebral body strength using supine lateral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 9:687

    Google Scholar 

  19. European Commission. Report on osteoporosis in the European Community (1998) Action for prevention. Luxembourg: Eur-OP

    Google Scholar 

  20. National Osteoporosis Foundation (1998) Physician’s Guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington DC: NOF

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eddy DM, Johnston ML, Cummings SR et al (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8:S3–S82

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yamada M, Ito M, Hayashi K et al (1994) Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture. Am J Roetgenol 163:1435–1440

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pacifici R, Rupich R, Griffin M et al (1990) Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of the osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:705–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. AACE Guidelines (2003) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition, with selected updates for 2003. Endocr Pract 9:54–64

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Genant HK et al (1995) Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in post-menopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 10:353–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thompson P, Taylor J, Fisher A et al (1998) Quantitative heel ultrasound in 3180 women between 45 and 75 years of age: compliance, normal ranges and relationship to fracture history. Osteoporos Int 8:211–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA et al (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. Arch Inter Med 157:629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Khaw KT, Reeve J, Luben R et al (2004) Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men at women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet 363:197–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Diez-Perez A, Marin F, Vila J et al (2003) Evaluation of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in a primary care setting as a screening tool for osteoporosis in post-menopausal women. J Clin Densitom 6:237–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Varney LF, Parker LA, Vincelette A et al (1999) Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in post-menopausal women is dependent on site-specific analysis. J Clin Densitom 2:275–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marin F, Lopez-Bastida J, Diez-Perez A, Sacristan JA (2004) Bone mineral density referral for dual energy x-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a pre-screening tool in post-menopausal women from the general population: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Calcif Tissue Int. 74:277–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis, Clinical guidelines of prevention and treatment. London: RCP

    Google Scholar 

  33. National Institutes of Health (2000) Consensus Development Conference on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy Bethsda MD: NIH

    Google Scholar 

  34. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. JAMA 285:785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, Reid I et al (1999) Interim report and recommendations of the WHO task force for osteoprosis. Osteoporos Int 10:259–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sociètè des Obstètriciens et Ginècologues du Canada (1998) Conference canadienne de consensus sur la mènopause e l’ostèoporose. J Soc Obstèt Ginècol Can 20:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  37. Agence Nazionale d’Accreditation et d’Èvaluation en Santè (2000) Les indications des measures quantitatives du tissue osseux: actualisation. Paris: ANAES

    Google Scholar 

  38. Report of a WHO Study group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post-menopausal osteoporosis. WHO Tech Rep Ser 843:3–5

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C et al (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Compston JE, Papapoulos SE, Blanchard F (1998) Report on osteoporosis in the European Community: current status and recommendations for the future. Working Party from European Union Member States. Osteoporos Int 8:531–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hanley DA, Josse RG (1996) Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 1. Introduction. Can Med Assoc J 155:921–923

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Siebzetner MI (2000) Consensus statement on prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Isr Med Assoc J 2:397–401

    Google Scholar 

  43. NIH Consensus Development Conference on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy (2000) Natcher Conference Center Nationale Institutes of Health. Betshda (MD) pp 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  44. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Physician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. (2003) Washington DC: NOF p 1

    Google Scholar 

  45. US Preventive Service Task Force (2002) Screening for osteoporosis in post-menopausal women: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:526–528

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gambacciani M, de Aloysio D, Elia D et al (2004) Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of bone in the management of post-menopausal women. Maturitas 47:139–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jeandel C (2004) Mèthodes diagnostiques de l’osteoporose post-menopausique et leurs indications. La revue de medicine interne 25:S538–S542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Guggenbuhl P, Meadeb J, Chales G et al (2005) Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus, pelvis and ankle: epidemiology and diagnosis. Join Bone Spine 72:372–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Koh L (2004) Osteoporosis: assessment for diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. J Men’s Health & Gender 1:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Laugier P (2004) An overview of bone sonometry. International Congress Series 1274:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kaplan RJ, Vo AN, Stitik TP et al (2005) Rehabilitation of orthopedic and rheumatologic disorders. 1. Osteoporosis assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86[Suppl l]:S40–S47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine

    A. Causero, A. Beltrame, P. Di Benedetto & E. Campailla

Authors
  1. A. Causero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Beltrame
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Di Benedetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Campailla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Causero, A., Beltrame, A., Di Benedetto, P., Campailla, E. (2006). Diagnosi strumentale dell’osteoporosi. In: Osteoporosi: le nuove prospettive in ortopedia e traumatologia. Corsi di perfezionamento in ortopedia e traumatologia. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0546-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0546-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0545-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0546-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation