Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Osteoporosi: la scienza di base, inquadramento, classificazione

  • Chapter
Osteoporosi: le nuove prospettive in ortopedia e traumatologia

Part of the book series: Corsi di perfezionamento in ortopedia e traumatologia ((CORSI))

  • 394 Accesses

Estratto

L’osso è un tessuto connettivo specializzato, costituito da una matrice extracellulare mineralizzata e da una componente cellulare. La matrice extracellulare del tessuto osseo è formata per il 40% da componenti organiche e per il 60% da componenti inorganiche. La componente organica è rappresentata da collagene, proteoglicani, proteine non collageniche, fattori di crescita e citochine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Miller MD (2000) Review of Orthopaedics, 3rd Edition. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simon SR (1994) Orthopaedic Basic Science, 2nd Edition. Rosemont, IL, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baron R (2003) Anatomy and Ultrastructure of Bone, 5th Primer on Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ducy P, Schinke T, Karsenty G (2000) The osteoblast: a sophisticated fibroblast under central surveillance. Science 289:1501–1504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouxsein M (2006) Bone structure and function, 15th IOF Advanced Training Course on Osteoporosis, Lione

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (2002) Principles of bone biology, 2nd Edition. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brinker MR, Miller MD (1999) Fundamentals of Orthopaedics. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Negrini S, Ortolani S, Gandolini G, Trevisan C per il Gruppo di Studio della Scoliosi e delle Patologie Vertebrali (1993) L’attività fisica nella prevenzione dell’osteoporosi

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan FS, Hayes WC, Keaveny TM (1994) Form and function of bone, orthopaedic basic science. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont

    Google Scholar 

  10. WHO Consensus Development Conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650

    Google Scholar 

  11. International Osteoporosis Foundation (2005) The facts about osteoporosis and its impact. IOF Web site. Available at: http://www.osteofound.org/press_centre/fact_sheet.html. Accessed July 26, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lane NE (2006) Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis. Am J Obst and Gyn 194:S3–S11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lauritzen JB, Schwarz P, Lund B et al (1999) Changing incidence and residual life-time risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures. Ost Int 3:127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dreinhofer KE, Féron J-M, Herrera A et al (2004) Orthopaedic surgeons and fragility fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:958–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson CM, Royds M, Abraham A et al (2002) Refractures in patients at least forty-five years old: a prospective analysis of twenty-two thousand and sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1528–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jepsen K (2003) The aging cortex: to crack or not to crack. Ost Int 14[Suppl 5]:S57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Currey JD (2001) Bone strength: what are we trying to measure? Calcif Tiss Int 68:205–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Burr D (2002) The contribution of the organic matrix to the bone’s material properties. Bone 31:8–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Efstathiadou Z, Tsatsoulis A, Ioannidis JP (2001) Association of collagen I alpha 1 Sp1 polymorphism with the risk of prevalent fractures: a meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Res 16:1586–1592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee K, Jessop H, Suswillo R et al (2003) Endocrinology: bone adaptation requires oestrogen receptor-alpha. Nature 424:389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Burr DB (2002) Targeted and non-targeted remodeling. Bone 30:2–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin RB (2003) Fatigue Microdamage as an essential element of bone mechanics and biology. Calcif Tiss Int 73:101–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burr DB, Martin RB (1993) Calculating the probability that microcracks initiate resorption spaces. J Biomech 26:613–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng XG, Nicholson PHF, Lowet G et al (1997) Prevalence of trabecular microcallus formation in the vertebral body and the femoral neck. Calcif Tiss Int 60:479–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Currey JD (1981) What is bone for? Propertyfunction relationships in bone. In: Cowin SC (ed) Mechanical properties of bone. ASME, New York, pp 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. Currey JD (1984) The mechanical adaptations of bones. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ioannidis JP, Ralston SH, Bennett ST et al (2004) Differential genetic effects of ESR1 gene polymorphisms on osteoporosis outcomes. JAMA 292:2105–2114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Kotowicz MA et al (2004) Seasonal periodicity of serum vitamin D and parathyroid hormone, bone resorption, and fractures: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 19:752–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rittweger J, Frost HM, Schiessl H et al (2005) Muscle atrophy and bone loss after 90 days’bed rest and the effects of flywheel resistive exercise and pamidronate: results from the LTBR study. Bone 36:1019–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bekker PJ, Holloway DL, Rasmussen AS et al (2004) A single-dose placebo-controlled study of AMG 162, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, in post-menopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 19:1059–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL et al (1998) Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93:165–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kong YY, Yoshida H, Sarosi I et al (1999) OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 397:315–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Emery JG, McDonnell P, Burke MB et al (1998) Osteoprotegerin is a receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL. J Biol Chem 273:14363–14367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee SK, Lorenzo JA (1999) Parathyroid hormone stimulates TRANCE and inhibits osteoprotegerin messenger ribonucleic acid expression in murine bone marrow cultures: correlation with osteoclast-like cell formation. Endocrinology 140(8): 3552–3561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kitazawa S, Kajimoto K, Kondo T, Kitazawa R (2003) Vitamin D3 supports osteoclastogenesis via functional vitamin D response element of human RANKL gene promoter. J Cell Biochem 89:771–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hofbauer LC, Gori F, Riggs BL, Lacey DL (1999) Stimulation of osteoprotegerin ligand and inhibition of osteoprotegerin production by glucocorticoids in human osteoblastic lineage cells: potential paracrine mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Endocrinology 140:4382–4389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Eghbali-Fatourechi G, Khosla S, Sanyal A, et al (2003) Role of RANK ligand in mediating increased bone resorption in early post-menopausal women. J Clin Invest 111:1221–1230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Langdahl BL, Carstens M, Stenkjaer L, Eriksen EF (2002) Polymorphisms in the osteoprotegerin gene are associated with osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 17:1245–1255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Limborgh J (1982) Factors controlling skeletal morphogenesis. In: Dixon AD, Sarnat BG (eds) Factors and mechanisms influencing bone growth: Proceedings of the International Conference Held at the University of California, Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, California, January 5–7, 1982. New York, NY: Alan R Liss Inc; pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  40. Buckwalter JA, Glimcher MJ, Cooper RR, Becker R (1996) Bone biology, part I: structure, blood supply, cells, matrix, and mineralization. Instr Course Lect 45:371–386

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Downey PA, Siegel MI (2006) Bone biology and the clinical implications for osteoporosis. Phys Ther 86:77–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fang J, Freeman R, Jeganathan R, Alderman MH (2004) Variations in hip frattura hospitalization rates among different race/ethnicity groups in New York City. Ethn Dis 14:280–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gong Y, Slee RB, Fukai N et al (2001) LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell 107:513–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Boyden LM, Mao J, Belsky J et al (2002) High bone density due to a mutation in LDL receptor-related protein 5. N Engl J Med 346:1513–1521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Geoffroy V, Kneissel M, Fournier B et al (2002) High bone resorption in adult aging transgenic mice overexpressing cbfal/runx2 in cells of the osteoblastic lineage. Mol Cell Bid 22:6222–6233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Andreoli A, De Lorenzo A, Van Loan M et al (2001) Effects of differents sports on bone density and muscle mass in highly trained athletes. Medicine Sport Science Exercise 33:507–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rosen CJ (2005) Post-menopausal Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 6:353

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, Dargent P et al, on behalf of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation USA (2002) A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Ost Int. 13:527–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Dreinhofer KE, Anderson M, Feron JM et al (2005) Multinational survey of osteoporotic fracture management. Ost Int. 16[Suppl 2]:S44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mundy GR (2006) Nutritional modulators of bone remodelling during aging. Am J Clin Nutr 83:427S–430S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Roma

    U. Tarantino & I. Cerocchi

  2. Fisiologia Umana, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Roma

    A. Andreoli

Authors
  1. U. Tarantino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Cerocchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Andreoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tarantino, U., Cerocchi, I., Andreoli, A. (2006). Osteoporosi: la scienza di base, inquadramento, classificazione. In: Osteoporosi: le nuove prospettive in ortopedia e traumatologia. Corsi di perfezionamento in ortopedia e traumatologia. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0546-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0546-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0545-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0546-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation