Estratto
L’esperienza clinica, le evoluzioni tecnologidie e le aspettative stesse riposte nell’intervento di sostituzione protesica dell’anca hanno condotto a modifiche di numerose caratteristiche delle componenti e delle tecniche di impianto.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliografia
Swanson TV (2005) The tapered press fit total hip arthroplasty. J Arthropl 20:63–67
Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314:1676–1686
National Institutes of Health (2000) Osteoporosis, prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH Consensus Statement 2000 17:1–36
Stepan JJ, Pospichal J, Presl J, Pacovsky V (1987) Bone loss and biochemical indices of bone remodeling in surgically induced postmenopausal women. Bone 8:279–284
Yamaguchi K, Masuhara K, Yamasaki S et al (2003) Predictive value of a preoperative biochemical bone marker in relation to bone remodeling after cementless total hip Arthrop. J Clin Densit 6:259–266
Arabmotlagh M, Hennigs T, Warzecha J, Rittmeister M (2005) Bone strength influences periprosthetic bone loss after hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:178–183
Foster AP, Thompson NW, Wong J, Charlwood AP (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Injury 36:424–429
Noble PC, Box GG, Kamaric E et al (1995) The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 316:31–44
Lodder MC, de Jong Z, Kostense PJ et al (2004) Bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: relation between disease severity and low bone mineral density. Ann Rheum Dis 63:1576–1580
Kobayashi S, Saito N, Horiuchi H et al (2000) Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty. Lancet 355:1499–1504
Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:457–467
Rosson JW, Surowiak J, Schatzker J, Hearn T (1996) Radiographic appearance and structural properties of proximal femoral bone in total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 11:180–183
Stulberg BN, Bauer TW, Watson JT, Richmond B (1989) Bone quality. Roentgenographic versus histologic assessment of hip bone structure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 240:200–205
Rahmy AI, Gosens T, Blake GM et al (2004) Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 15:281–289
Sharma H, Rana B, Watson C et al (2005) Femoral neck fractures complicating metal-on-metal resurfaced hips: a report of 2 cases. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 13:69–72
Shimmin AJ, Back D (2005) Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:463–464
Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB (2005) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:167–170
Wyness L, Vale L, McCormack K et al (2004) The effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing: a systematic review of the available evidence published before 2002. MC Health Serv Res 4:39
Duijsens AW, Keizer S, Vliet-Vlieland T, Nelissen RG (2005) Resurfacing hip pros-theses evisited: failure analysis during a 16-year follow-up. Int Orthop 29:224–228
Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS (1995) Effect of neck resection on torsional stability of cementless total hip replacement. Am J Orthop 24:766–770
Nunn D, Freeman MA, Tanner KE, Bonfield W (1989) Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty. Response to an anteriorly applied load. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:452–455
Kligman M, Kirsh G (2000) Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty in osteo-porotic patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 59:136–139
Porter AE, Taak P, Hobbs LW et al (2004) Bone bonding to hydroxyapatite and titanium surfaces on femoral stems retrieved from human subjects at autopsy. Biomaterials 25:5199–5208
Park YS, Lee JY, Yun SH et al (2003) Comparison of hydroxyapatite-and porous-coated stems in total hip replacement. Acta Ortfaop Scand 74:259–263
Coathup MJ, Blunn GW, Flynn N et al (2001) A comparison of bone remodelling around hydroxyapatite-coated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:118–123
Goyenvalle E, Aguado E, Nguyen JM et al (2006) Osteointegration of femoral stem prostheses with abilayered calcium phosphate coating. Biomaterials 27:1119–1128
Kusakabe H, Sakamaki T, Nihei K et al (2004) Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem. Biomaterials 25:2957–2969
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Casella, F., Panegrossi, G., Favetti, F., Falez, F. (2006). Quale ruolo per le protesi d’anca di nuova generazione?. In: Osteoporosi: le nuove prospettive in ortopedia e traumatologia. Corsi di perfezionamento in ortopedia e traumatologia. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0546-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0546-4_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0545-7
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0546-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)