The Complex Problem of Modeling Economic Complexity

  • R. H. Day
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)


Theoretical science generates testable, logical (mathematical) systems of thought that explain or comprehend observations and empirical data that themselves only reflect some properties of some realm of experience. Progress began to occur rapidly when stable, repetitive patterns were discovered, such as the motion of stellar bodies that could be carefully observed and their distances, masses, and velocities measured, and such as the ratios in which various pure substances interacted to form different compound substances.


Central Bank Recursive Programming General Equilibrium Theory Rational Mind Perfect Coordination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Burckhardt J., (1979): Reflections on History, Liberty Classics, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  2. Cannon W., (1963): The Wisdom of the Body, W.W. Norton and Co., New York.Google Scholar
  3. Chiarella C., Flaschel P., Groh G., Semmler W., (2000): Disequilibrium Growth and Labor Market Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. Childe V.G., (1951): Man Makes Himself, The New American Library of World Literature, Inc., New York. Originally published in 1931.Google Scholar
  5. Cyert R., March, J., (1992): A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd edition, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Day R., (1963): Recursive Programming and Production Response, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Day R., (1994): Complex Economic Dynamics, Volume I, An Introduction to Dynamical Systems and Market Mechanisms, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Day R., 2000, Complex Economic Dynamics, Volume II, An Introduction to Macroeconomic Dynamics, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Day R., (2000): The Divergent Dynamics of Economic Growth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  10. Day R., Kennedy P., (1970): Recursive decision systems: an existence analysis, Econometrica 38, 666–681.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Flaschel, P., Franke, R. and Semmler, W., (1997): Dynamic Macroeconomics: Instability, Fluctuations and Growth in Monetary Economics, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Kirman A., (1975): Learning by firms about demand conditions, Day, R and Groves, T. (eds), Adaptive Economic Models, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. March J., Simon H., (1958): Organizations, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  14. Mezler L., (1941): The nature and stability of inventory cycles, Review of Economic Statistics 23, 100–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Modigliani, F. and Cohen, K. J.: 1963, The Role of Anticipations and Plans in Economic Behavior, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
  16. Morishima M., (1994): Dynamic Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Nelson, R. and Winter, S.: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Quigley C., (1979): The Evolution of Civilization, Liberty Press, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  19. Schumpeter J., (1954): History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Simon H., (1983): Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  21. Toulmin S., Goodfield J., (1961): The Fabric of the Heavens, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. Toulmin S., Goodfield J., (1962): The Architecture of Matter University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Winter S., (1964): Economic ‘natural’ selection and the theory of the firm, Yale Economic Essays, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Day
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SouthernCaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations