Abstract
‘Complexity’ ideas are becoming a hot issue in economics. Originally developed within the natural sciences, complexity theory is now believed by many to be a novel and powerful framework of thought, capable of challenging the fundamental principles sustained by mainstream economics for more than a century. One of its main advocates, David Colander (2000a:31), has written that “Complexity changes everything; well, maybe not everything, but it does change quite a bit in economics”. Also, in a recent issue of a popular scientific magazine, it is suggested that complexity ideas “are beginning to map out a radical and long-overdue revision of economic theory” (Buchanan, New Scientist, 2004:35). Indeed, the proliferation of publications, journals, summer schools, and conferences on complexity economics during the past few years can hardly pass unnoticed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amin A., Hausner J. (1997): Beyond market and hierarchy. Interactive governance and social complexity. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Arthur B., Durlauf S., Lane D. (1997): The economy as an evolving complex system II. Perseus Books, Reading
Buchanan M. (2004): It’s the economy, stupid. New Scientist 182:34–37
Colander D. (2000a): Complexity and the history of economic thought. Routledge, London
Colander D. (2000b): The complexity vision and the teaching of economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Northampton
Cowan G. (1997): Complexity? Who ordered that? Complexity 2:56–57
Delorme R. (1997): The foundational bearing of complexity. In: Amin A., Hausner J. (eds):, Beyond market and hierarchy: Interactive governance and social complexity. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 32–56
Delorme R. (2001): Theorizing complexity. In: Foster J., Metcalfe J. S. (eds) Frontiers of evolutionary economics. Competition, self-organization and innovation policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Northampton, pp 80–108
Dent E. B. 1999): Complexity science: a worldview shift. Emergence 1:5–19
Downward P. (2003): Applied economics and the critical realist critique. Routledge, London New York
Edmonds B. (1999): Syntactic measures of complexity. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester (http://bruce.edmonds.name)
Edmonds B. (2001): Against: a priori theory. For: descriptively adequate computational modeling. Post-Autistic Economics Review 10:article 2 (http://www.paecon.net)
Elliott E., Kiel L. D. (1998): Introduction. In: Kiel L. D., Elliott E. (eds) Chaos theory in the social sciences. Foundations and applications. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 1–15
Fontana W., Ballati S. (1999): Complexity. Why the sudden fuss? Complexity 4:14–16
Fox G. (1997): Reason and reality in the methodologies of economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Lyme
Harvey D. L., Reed M. (1998): Social science as the study of complex systems. In: Kiel L. D., Elliott E. (eds): Chaos theory in the social sciences. Foundations and applications. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 295–323
Hayek F. A. (1967): The theory of complex phenomena. In: Hayek FA, Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Heylighen F. (1999): The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. In: Heylighen F., Bollen J., Riegler A. (eds) The evolution of complexity The violet book of “Einstein meets Magrite”, VUB University Press and Kluwer Academic Publishers, Brussels Dordrecht, pp 17–44
Kilpatrick H. E. (2001): Complexity, spontaneous order, and Friedrich Hayek: are spontaneous order and complexity essentially the same thing? Complexity 6:16–20
Lavoie D. (1994): Austrian models? Possibilities of evolutionary computation. In: Boettke P. J. (ed) The Elgar companion to Austrian Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 549–555
Lawson T. (2001): Two responses to the failings of modern economics: the instrumentalist and the realist. Review of Population and Social Policy 10:155–181
Lawson T. (2003a): Reorienting economics. Routledge, London
Lawson T. (2003b): Heterodox economics: what is it? (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Heterodox Economics, Nottingham Trent University-UK)
Lawson T. (2003c): The (confused) state of equilibrium analysis in modern economics: an (ontological) explanation. (Paper presented at the London History and Philosophy of Science Meetings, LSE-CPNSS, London-UK)
Leijonhufvud A. (1995): Adaptive behavior, market processes and the computable approach. Revue Economique 46:1497–1510
Lissack M. (1999): Complexity: the science, its vocabulary, and its relation to organizations. Emergence 1:110–126
Lloyd S. (1999): Complexity: plain and simple. Complexity 4:72
McIntyre L. (1998): Complexity: a philosopher’s reflections. Complexity 3:26–32
Perona E. (2004): Conceptualising complexity in economic analysis: a philosophical, including ontological, study. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge
Potts J. (2000): The new evolutionary microeconomics. Complexity, competence and adaptive behavior. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Northampton
Pratten S. (2005): Economics as progress: the LSE approach to econometric modeling and Critical Realism as programmes for research. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29:179–205)
Reed M., Harvey D. L. (1992): The new science and the old: complexity and realism in the social sciences. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 22:353–380
Rosser J. B. (2004): Complexity in economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Northampton
Schenk K. E. (2003): Economic institutions and complexity. Structures, interactions and emergent properties. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Northampton
Simon H. (1976): How complex are complex systems? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol 1976, Issue Two: Symposia and Invited Papers, The University of Chicago Press, pp 507–522
Simpson D. (2000): Rethinking economic behavior. How the economy really works. Macmillan, Basingstoke
Wible J. (2000): What is complexity? In: Colander D. (ed) Complexity and the history of economic thought. Routledge, London, pp 15–30
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perona, E. (2007). The Confused State of Complexity Economics: An Ontological Explanation. In: Complexity Hints for Economic Policy. New Economic Windows. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0534-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0534-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0533-4
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0534-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)