Implications of Scaling Laws for Policy-Makers

  • M. Gallegati
  • A. Kirman
  • A. Palestrini
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)


The industrial dynamic literature has shown the existence of some stylized facts regarding firms’ distribution among which a very important one, for the reasons discussed in the paper, is the scaling law of firms’ size (Axtell, 2001)1.


Concentration Index Idiosyncratic Shock Aggregate Rate Idiosyncratic Volatility Total Variable Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aghion P., Harris C., Howitt P., and Vickers J. (2001): Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation, Review of Economic Studies, 68, pp. 121–144.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaral L., Buldyrev S., Havlin S., Leschhorn H., Maas P., Salinger M., Stanley E., and Stanley M. (1997), Scaling Behavior in Economics: I. Empirical Results for Company Growth, Journal de Physique, 7, pp. 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axtell R. (2001): Zipf Distribution of U.S. firm sizes, Science, 293, pp. 1818–1820.PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Bottazzi G., and Secchi A. (2003): Why Are Distribution of Frms’ Growth Rates Tent-shaped? Economic Letters, 80, pp. 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll C. (2001): Requiem for the Representative Consumer? Aggregate Implications of Microeconomics Consumption Behavior, American Economic Review, 90, pp. 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delli Gatti D., Di Guilmi C., Gaffeo E., Gallegati M., Giulioni G. and Palestrini A. (2005): A New Approach to Business Fluctuations: Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, Scaling Laws and Financial Fragility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56, pp. 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forni M., and Lippi M. (1997): Aggregation and the Microfoundations of Dynamic Macroeconomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabaix X. (2005): Power Laws and the Granular Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations, mimeo M.I.T. and NBER.Google Scholar
  9. Gaffeo E., Gallegati M., and Palestrini A. (2003): On the Size Distribution of Firms. Additional Evidence from the G7 Countries. Physica A, 324, pp. 17–123.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibrat R. (1931): Les inégalités économiques; applications: aux inégalités des richesses, à la concentration des entreprises, aux populations des villes, aux statistiques des familles, etc., d’une loi nouvelle, la loi de l’effet proportionnel. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
  11. Gini C. (1922): Indici di concentrazione e di dipendenza, Biblioteca dell’Economista, 20.Google Scholar
  12. Grossman G., and Helpman E. (1991): Quality Ladders and Product Cycles, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guarini R., and Tassinari F. (2000): Statistica Economica, Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
  14. Hildebrand W., and Kirman A. (1988): Equilibrium Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Ijiri, Y., & Simon, H. (1964): Business firm growth and size. American Economic Review, 54, 77–89.Google Scholar
  16. Ijiri Y., and Simon, H. (1977): Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms, North Holland, Amsterdam.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirman A. (1992): Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent? Journal of Economic Perspective, 6, pp. 117–136.Google Scholar
  18. Lebwel A. (1989): Exact Aggregation and the Representative Consumer, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, pp. 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lévy P. (1925): Calcul des probabilities. Gauthiers-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar
  20. Mandelbrot B.B. (1960): The Pareto-Lévy Law and the Distribution of Income, International Economic Review, 1:2, pp. 79–105.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mantegna R.N., and Stanley H. Eugene (2000): An Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.Google Scholar
  22. Palestrini A. (2005): Analysis of Industrial Dynamics: the Relationship between Firms’ Size and Growth Rate, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  23. Pareto V. (1897): Cours d’Économie Politique. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  24. Reed W. (2001): The Pareto, Zipf and Other Power Laws, Economics Letters, 74, pp. 15–19.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stanley M. (1997): Scaling Behavior in Economics: I. Empirical Results for Company Growth, Journal de Physique, 7, pp. 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stanley M., Amaral L., Buldyrev S., Havlin S., Leschhorn, H., Maass P. Salinger M.A., and Stanley H. (1996): Scaling Behaviour in the Growth of Companies, Nature, 379, pp. 804–806.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Stoker T. (1993): Empirical Approaches to the Problem of Aggregation Over Individuals, Journal of Economic Literature, 21, pp. 1827–1874.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Gallegati
    • 1
  • A. Kirman
    • 2
  • A. Palestrini
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento di EconomiaUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheItaly
  2. 2.Université Paul Cézanne (Aix-Marseille III), EHESSGreqam-IdepFrance
  3. 3.University of TeramoItaly

Personalised recommendations