IFAE 2006 pp 237-241 | Cite as

Charged kaons and Vus at KLOE

  • KLOE collaboration
Conference paper


At the Frascati phi-factory Dafne e + and e beams collide in the center of mass energy of the the φ-meson which decays into anti-collinear K \( \bar K \) pairs. In the laboratory this remains approximately true because of the small crossing angle of the e + e beams. Therefore the detection of a K(\( \bar K \) ) tags the presence of a \( \bar K \) (K) of given momentum and direction. The decay products of the K ± pair define two spatially well separated regions called the tag and the signal hemispheres. Identified K decays tag a K ± beam and provide an absolute count, using the total number of tags as normalization. This procedure is a unique feature of a φ-factory and provides the means for measuring absolute branching ratios. Charged kaons are tagged using the two body decays K ± → μ± v μ and K ±π ± π 0. Since the two body decays correspond to about 85% of the charged kaon decays [4] and since BR(φK + K ) ≃ 49% [4], there are about 1.5 × 106 K + K events/pb−1. The two body decays are identified as peaks in the momentum spectrum of the secondary tracks in the kaon rest frame and in the pion mass hypothesis p*(m π) In order to minimize the impact of the trigger efficiency, the tagging kaon by itself must provide the event trigger (self-trigger).


Body Decay Decay Vertex Kaon Decay Charged Kaon Secondary Track 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Adinolfi et al., [KLOE Collaboration], The tracking detector of the KLOE experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth A 488 2002 51ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Adinolfi et al., [KLOE Collaboration], The KLOE electomagnetic calorimeter, Nucl. Instrum. Meth A 482 2002 364CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Adinolfi et al., [KLOE Collaboration], The trigger system of the KLOE experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth A 492 2002 134CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Eidelman et al., Particle Data Group, Phys. Lett. B 592 2004 1CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Ambrosino et al. [KLOE Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 76 [arXiv:hep-ex/0509045].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Leutwyler and M. Roos, Z. Phys. C 25, 91 (1984).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 231803 [arXiv:hep-ph/0402299].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Bernard et al. [MILC Collaboration], PoS LAT2005 (2006) 025 [arXiv:heplat/0509137].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 032002 [arXiv:hepph/0510099].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • KLOE collaboration
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi “Federico II” e Sezione INFNNapoli

Personalised recommendations