Advertisement

IFAE 2006 pp 237-241 | Cite as

Charged kaons and Vus at KLOE

  • KLOE collaboration
Conference paper

Abstract

At the Frascati phi-factory Dafne e + and e beams collide in the center of mass energy of the the φ-meson which decays into anti-collinear K \( \bar K \) pairs. In the laboratory this remains approximately true because of the small crossing angle of the e + e beams. Therefore the detection of a K(\( \bar K \) ) tags the presence of a \( \bar K \) (K) of given momentum and direction. The decay products of the K ± pair define two spatially well separated regions called the tag and the signal hemispheres. Identified K decays tag a K ± beam and provide an absolute count, using the total number of tags as normalization. This procedure is a unique feature of a φ-factory and provides the means for measuring absolute branching ratios. Charged kaons are tagged using the two body decays K ± → μ± v μ and K ±π ± π 0. Since the two body decays correspond to about 85% of the charged kaon decays [4] and since BR(φK + K ) ≃ 49% [4], there are about 1.5 × 106 K + K events/pb−1. The two body decays are identified as peaks in the momentum spectrum of the secondary tracks in the kaon rest frame and in the pion mass hypothesis p*(m π) In order to minimize the impact of the trigger efficiency, the tagging kaon by itself must provide the event trigger (self-trigger).

Keywords

Body Decay Decay Vertex Kaon Decay Charged Kaon Secondary Track 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Adinolfi et al., [KLOE Collaboration], The tracking detector of the KLOE experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth A 488 2002 51ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Adinolfi et al., [KLOE Collaboration], The KLOE electomagnetic calorimeter, Nucl. Instrum. Meth A 482 2002 364CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Adinolfi et al., [KLOE Collaboration], The trigger system of the KLOE experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth A 492 2002 134CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Eidelman et al., Particle Data Group, Phys. Lett. B 592 2004 1CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Ambrosino et al. [KLOE Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 76 [arXiv:hep-ex/0509045].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Leutwyler and M. Roos, Z. Phys. C 25, 91 (1984).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 231803 [arXiv:hep-ph/0402299].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Bernard et al. [MILC Collaboration], PoS LAT2005 (2006) 025 [arXiv:heplat/0509137].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 032002 [arXiv:hepph/0510099].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • KLOE collaboration
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi “Federico II” e Sezione INFNNapoli

Personalised recommendations