IFAE 2006 pp 211-214 | Cite as

Detection methods for long lived particles at the LHC

  • Sara Viganò
  • Alberto De Min
Conference paper


Almost all the extensions of the Standard Model predict the existence of new charged particles; these particles should be very heavy since they have excaped detection so far. In general, such heavy particles decay as soon as they are produced, but under certain circumstances they can be long-lived or even stable. There are two classes of models which predicts the existence of long-lived particles [3]: models with a weakly broken symmetry, where the particle would be stable if the symmetry were exact; and models with an exact symmetry which forbids the decay of heavy exotics into ordinary particles, where the decay of the charged particle into a neutral particle is suppressed either by small couplings or by phase space. Examples of the second kind are supersymmetric models with exact R-parity, where the lightest supersymmetric particle is the gravitino. In this talk we will focus on GMSB (Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking) which belongs to this kind of models. In GMSB supersymmetry is broken in a so called hidden sector at a scale \( \sqrt F \) and transmitted to SM particles via a messenger sector. The transmission of the supersymmetry breaking is mediated by gauge fields, in particular by N singlet representations of SU(5).


Supersymmetry Breaking SUSY Breaking Hide Sector Gravitino Mass Electromagnetic Calorimeter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    CMS Collaboration, CMS Technical Design Report, CERN/LHCC 2006-001Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Technical Design Report, CERN/LHCC 99-15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Drees, X. Tata, Signals for heavy exotics at hadron colliders and supercolliders, Phys. Lett. B 252 (December 27th 1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Kazana, G. Wrochna, P. Zalewski, Study of the NLSP from the GMSB models in the CMS detector at tha LHC, CMS CR 1999/019Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Franzoni, The electromagnetic calorimeter of CMS and its sensitivity to non-pointing photons, PhD Thesis, Università di Milano, 2004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Brunelière, A. Zabi, Reconstruction of the signal amplitude of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter, CMS NOTE 2006/037Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Bonesini, T. Camporesi et al., Inter-calibration of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter with cosmic rays before installation, CMS NOTE 2005/023Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Ambrosiano, B. Mele et al., SUSY Long-Lived Massive Particles: Detection and Physics at the LHC, hep-ph/0012192Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Viganò
    • 1
  • Alberto De Min
    • 2
  1. 1.Università di Milano Bicocca and INFN MilanoMilano
  2. 2.Politecnico di Milano and INFN MilanoMilano

Personalised recommendations