Advertisement

Agents Play Mix-game

  • Chengling Gou
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Abstract

In recent years, economics and finance see the shift of paradigm from representative agent models to heterogeneous agent models [1, 2]. More and more economists and physicists made efforts in research on heterogeneous agent models for financial markets. Minority game (MG) proposed by D. Challet, and Y. C. Zhang [3] is an example among such efforts. Challet and Zhang’s MG model, together with the original bar model of Arthur, attracts a lot of following studies [4, 5, 6]. Given MG’s richness and yet underlying simplicity, MG has also received much attention as a financial market model [4]. MG comprises an odd number of agents choosing repeatedly between the options of buying (1) and selling (0) a quantity of a risky asset. The agents continually try to make the minority decision, i.e. buy assets when the majority of other agents are selling, and sell when the majority of other agents are buying. Neil F. Johnson [4, 5] and coworkers extended MG by allowing a variable number of active traders at each timestep— they called their modified game as the Grand Canonical Minority Game (GCMG). GCMG, and to a lesser extent the basic MG itself, can reproduce the stylized facts of financial markets, such as volatility clustering and fat-tail distributions.

Keywords

Time Horizon Risky Asset Excess Demand Strategy Space Local Volatility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Levy M, Levy H, Solomon S (1994) Economics Letters 45: 103–111MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levy M, Levy H, Solomon S (2000) Microscopic Simulation of Financial Markets. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Challet D, Zhang Y C (1997) Phyisca A 246: 407CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson N F, Jefferies P, Hui P M (2003), Financial Market Complexity. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jefferies P, Johnson N F (2001) Oxford Center for Computational Finance working paper: OCCF/010702Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coolen A C C (2005) The Mathematical Theory of Minority Games. Oxford University Press, OxfordMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andersen J V, Sornette D (2003) Eur. Phys. J. B 31: 141–145CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lux T (1995) Economic Journal 105(431): 881–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lux T, Marchesi M (1999) Nature 397(6719): 498–500CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Challet D (2005) arXiv: physics/0502140 v1Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slanina F, Zhang Y-C (2001) Physica A 289: 290MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoon S M, Kim K (2005) arXiv: physics/0503016 v1Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giardina I, Bouchaud J P (2003) Eur. Phys. J. B 31: 421CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marsili M (2001) Physica A 299: 93MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martino A D, Giardina I, Mosetti G (2003) J. Phys. A 36: 8935MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tedeschi A, Martino A D, Giardina I(2005) arXiv: cond-mat/0503762Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martino A D, Giardina1 I, Marsili M, Tedeschi A (2004) arXiv: cond-mat/0403649Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhong L X, Zheng D F, Zheng B, Hui P M (2004) arXiv: cond-mat/0412524Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shleifer A (2000) Inefficient Markets: an Introduction to Behavioral Financial. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Savit R, Koelle K, Treynor W, Gonzalez R (2004) In: Tumer K, Wolpert D (eds) Collectives and the Desing of Complex System. Springer-Verlag, New York, P199–212Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bouchaud J P, Cont R (1998) Eur. Phys. J. B 6: 543CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Farmer J D (2002) Industrial and Corporate Change 11: 895–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kephart J O, Hogg T, Huberman B A (1989) Physical Review A 40(1): 404–421CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang C (2004) Thesis of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hart M L, Johnson N F(2002) Physica A 311: 275–290MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chalet D (2004) arXiv: cond-mat/0407595.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gou C (2005) arXiv: physics/0504001 v3, accepted by Chinese PhysicsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gou C (2005) www.cfrn.com.cn: paperID=1548, submitted to JASSSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chengling Gou
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentBeijing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsHeidian District, BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations