Skip to main content

Person Measurement and Rehabilitation Outcome: the New Perspective of Rasch Analysis

  • Chapter
Clinical Psychology and Heart Disease
  • 1506 Accesses

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 1980 definition, disability consists in any restriction or lack of ability (resulting from impairment) to perform an activity in the manner or within the range considered normal for a human being [1]. The new WHO model (2001) gives to the term disability a broader, more general connotation, but nonetheless confirms the importance of “activities” as the constitutive elements of a person’s “functioning” [2]. Disability and activity are viewed in relation to the person as a whole. For example, a heart condition (according to the 1980 WHO model) might be defined as a lessening (or malfunctioning) of one body part. Difficulty going up stairs likewise represents a deficit with respect to an activity (since a whole person, only, can climb stairs). A deficit in one or more activities defines a malfunctioning of the whole person and is therefore called a disability. Usually, the definition of “function” is misunderstood. In the context of rehabilitative medicine, a recent definition [3], [4] — namely, energy or information exchange — is useful. For although this definition is general, it makes an important distinction between physiologic functions (breathing, nerve conduction, etc.), and functions that take place between the person and environment — in other words, “activities.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. WHO (1980) International classification of impairments, disability, and handicaps

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health, ICF

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tesio L (2006) Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Principles methods (in italian). Encycl Med Chir I-26-030-B-10, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tesio L (2003) Functional measures in rehabilitation medicine. Principles and methods (in italian). Giorn Ital Med Riabil 3:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tesio L (1995) Biomedicine between science and assistance. Rehabilitation medicine: the science of assistance (in italian). Il Nuovo areopago 2:80–105

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wade DT, Halligan PW (2004) Do biomedical models of illness make for good health care systems? BMJ 329:1398–1401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tesio L (2004) Measurement in clinical vs. biological medicine: the Rasch model as a bridge on a widening gap. J Appl Meas 4:362–366

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feinstein AR (1987) Clinimatrics. University Press, Yale

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tesio L (2003) Outcome research in rehabilitation: variable construction, trial design and statistical inference. In: Soroker N, Ring H (Eds) Advances in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 449–505

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tesio L, Granger CV, Fiedler R (1997) A unidimensional pain-disability scale for low back pain syndromes. Pain 69:269–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsuji T, Sonoda S, Domen K et al (1995) ADL structure for stroke patients in Japan based on the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 6:432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hajiro T, Nishimura K, Tsukino M et al (1998) Analysis of clinical methods used to evaluate dyspnoea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 4:1185–1189

    Google Scholar 

  13. Criteria Committee NYHA (1964) In: diseases of the heart and blood vessels: nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis. Little Brosn & Co Inc, Boston, MA, p 114

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tesio L (2003) Measuring a person’s behaviors and perceptions: rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med 35:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tesio L, Franchignoni FP, Battaglia MA, Perucca L (1997) Quality assessment of FIM (functional independence measure) ratings through rasch analysis. Eur Med Phys 33:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rasch G (1960) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bond TG, Fox CM (2001) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wright BD, Stone MH (1979) Best test design. Rasch measurement. MESA Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wright BD, Masters GN (1982) Rating scale analysis. Rasch measurement. MESA Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  20. Andrich D (1998) Rasch models for measurement. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Penta M, Arnould C, Decrunayère C (2005) Développer et interpréter une échelle de mesure. Applications du modèle de Rasch. Pierre Margada éditeur, Liège

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tesio L, Valsecchi MR, Sala M et al (2002) Level of activity in profound/severe mental retardation (LAPMER): a rasch-derived scale of disability. J Appl Meas 1:50–84

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L et al (2004) Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care 42:I37–I48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Franchignoni FP, Tesio L, Martino MT et al (1998) Length of stay of stroke rehabilitation inpatients: prediction through the functional independence measure. Ann Ist Sup San 4:463–467

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tesio L, Granger CV, Perucca L et al (2002) The FIM™ instrument in the United States and Italy: a comparative study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81:168–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tesio, L. (2006). Person Measurement and Rehabilitation Outcome: the New Perspective of Rasch Analysis. In: Clinical Psychology and Heart Disease. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0378-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0378-1_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0377-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0378-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics