Advertisement

Why Economics Must Abandon its Theory of the Firm

Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Marginal Cost Demand Curve Economic Journal Aggregate Output 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.: 1959, Towards a theory of price adjustments, in e. a. M. Abramovitz (ed.), The Allocation of Economic Resources, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aslambeigui, N. and Naples, M.: 1997, Scissors or horizon: Neoclassical debates about returns to scale, costs, and long run supply, 1926–1942, Southern Economic Journal 64, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aumann, R.: 1964, Markets with a continuum of traders, Econometrica 32, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aumann, R.: 1966, Existence of competitive equilibria in markets with a continuum of traders, Econometrica 34, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, R.: 1948, Cost discontinuities, declining costs and marginal analysis, American Economic Review 38, 1–17.Google Scholar
  6. Blinder, A., Canetti, E., Lebow, D. and Rudd, J.: 1998, Asking About Prices: a New Approach to Understanding Price Stickiness, Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Boland, L.: 1981, On the futility of criticizing the neoclassical maximization hypothesis, American Economic Review 71, 1031–1036.Google Scholar
  8. Conkling, R.: 1999, Marginal cost pricing for utilities: a digest of the california experience, Contemporary Economic Policy 17, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cournot, A.: 1988, Of the competition of producers, in A. Daughety (ed.), Cournot Oligopoly, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Downward, P. and Lee, F.: 2001, Post keynesian pricing theory reconfirmed? a critical review of asking about prices, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics pp. 465–483.Google Scholar
  11. Eichner, A.: 1976, The Megacorp and Oligopoly: Micro Foundations of Macro Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eiteman, W.: 1947, Factors determining the location of the least cost point, American Economic Review 37, 910–918.Google Scholar
  13. Eiteman, W.: 1948, The least cost point, capacity and marginal analysis: a rejoinder, American Economic Review 38, 899–904.Google Scholar
  14. Ellison, G.: 1994, Cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma with anonymous random matching, Review of Economic Studies 61, 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman, J.: 1983, Oligopoly Theory, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, M.: 1953, The methodology of positive economics, Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Groenewegen, P.: 1995, A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842-1924, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Haines, W.: 1948, Capacity production and the least cost point, American Economic Review 38, 617–624.Google Scholar
  19. Harrod, R.: 1934, Doctrines of imperfect competition, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 48, 442–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keen, S.: 2001, Debunking Economics, Sydney & London: Pluto Press & Zed Books.Google Scholar
  21. Keen, S.: 2003, Standing on the toes of pygmies: Why econophysics must be careful of the economic foundations on which it builds, Physica A 324, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuenne, R.: 1998, Price and Nonprice Rivalry in Oligopoly, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Langlois, C.: 1989, Markup pricing versus marginalism: a controversy revisited, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12, 127–151.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, F.: 1996, Pricing and the business enterprise, in C. Whalen (ed.), Political Economy for the 21st century, ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, F.: 1998, Post Keynesian Price Theory, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Makowski, L.: 1987, Are ‘rational conjectures’ rational?, The Journal of Industrial Economics 36, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marks, R.: 2000, Evolved perception and the validation of simulation models, in C. C. K. S. M. R. S. H. Barnett, W. (ed.), Commerce, Complexity and Evolution, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Marshall, A.: 1907, Principles of Economics, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, A.: 1925, Correspondence with professor a. l. bowley, Memorials of Alfred Marshall, Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, S.: 2001, Advanced Industrial Economics, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Mas-Colell, A.: 1983, Walrasian equilibria as limits of noncooperative equilibria. part i: Mixed strategies, Journal of Economic Theory 30, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Means, G.: 1972, The administered-price thesis reconsidered, American Economic Review 62, 292–306.Google Scholar
  33. Moss, S.: 1984, The history of the theory of the firm from marshall to robinson to chamberlin: the source of positivism in economics, Economica 51, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nichol, A.: 1934, A re-appraisal of cournot’s theory of duopoly price, The Journal of Political Economy 42, 80–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Novshek, W.: 1980, Cournot equilibrium with free entry, Review of Economic Studies 47, 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Novshek, W.: 1985, Perfectly competitive markets as the limits of cournot markets, Journal of Economic Theory 35, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Novshek, W. and Sonnenschein, H.: 1983, Walrasian equilibria as limits of noncooperative equilibria. part ii: Pure strategies, Journal of Economic Theory 30, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pigou, A.: 1922, Empty economic boxes — a reply, Economic Journal 36, 459–465.Google Scholar
  39. Pigou, A.: 1927, The law of diminishing and increasing cost, Economic Journal 41, 188–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pigou, A.: 1928, An analysis of supply, Economic Journal 42, 238–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robbins, L.: 1928, The representative firm, Economic Journal 42, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robertson, D.: 1924, Those empty boxes, Economic Journal 34, 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson, D.: 1930, The trees of the forest, Economic Journal 44, 80–89.Google Scholar
  44. Rosput, P.: 1993, The Limits to Deregulation of Entry and Expansion of the US Gas Pipeline Industry, Utilities Policy.Google Scholar
  45. Rotwein, E.: 1959, On ‘the methodology of positive economics’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 73, 554–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rust, J.: 1997, Using randomization to break the curse of dimensionality, Econometrica 65, 487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sato, K.: 1979, A note on capital and output aggregation in a general equilibrium model of production, Econometrica 47, 1559–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmalensee, R.: 1988, Industrial economics: an overview, Economic Journal 98, 643–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schumpeter, J.: 1936, The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Shepherd, W.: 1984, ’contestability’ vs. competition, American Economic Review 74, 572–587.Google Scholar
  51. Shove, G.: 1930, The representative firm and increasing returns, Economic Journal 44, 93–116.Google Scholar
  52. Simon, J., Puig, C. and Aschoff, J.: 1973, A duopoly simulation and richer theory: an end to cournot, Review of Economic Studies 40, 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sraffa, P.: 1926, The law of returns under competitive conditions, Economic Journal 40, 538–550.Google Scholar
  54. Sraffa, P.: 1930, The trees of the forest—a criticism, Economic Journal 44, 89–92.Google Scholar
  55. Standish, R. and Keen, S.: 2004, Emergent effective collusion in an economy of perfectly rational competitors, Complexity International (submitted).Google Scholar
  56. Stigler, G.: 1957, Perfect competition, historically considered, Journal of Political Economy 65, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strait, R.: 1994, Decision analysis approach to competitive situations with a pure infinite regress, Decision Sciences 25, 853–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Keen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations