Skip to main content

Incentivos para innovar: Una revisión

  • Chapter
  • 428 Accesses

Resumen

Los incentivos para la innovación constituyen un elemento central de la teoría de la innovación, y conocer en qué forma en la que actúan dichos incentivos es crucial para la formulación de una política tecnológica fundamentada. Desde el punto de vista de la iniciativa privada, los innovadores financian de forma privada la innovación y luego utilizan los mecanismos de protección de la propiedad intelectual para obtener el retorno apropiado de esas inversiones. Para otros tipos de agentes, como los investigadores académicos o los consorcios públicos-privados, los incentivos pueden estar relacionados también con la reputación personal y el avance en la carrera profesional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografía

  • Acemoglu D, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A. Experimentation, patents and innovation. AEJ: Microeconomics. 2011;3:37–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Bolton P. Contracts as a Barrier to Entry. American Economic Review. 1987;77(3):388–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundel R, Griffith R, Howitt P. Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2005;120:701–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions. In: Nelson R, editor. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basberg B. Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Research Policy. 1987;16:131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla I, Hale G, Long C. Foreign direct investment and the incentives to innovate and imitate. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 2009;111(4):835–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J. Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms. Review of Economic Studies. 1999;66:529–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Sappington DEM. Exclusive contracts, innovation and welfare. AEJ: Microeconomics. 2011;3:194–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn I, Henderson RM. Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics. 1998;46(2):157–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levintahl DA. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal. 1989;99:569–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darai D, Sacco D, Schmutzler A. Competition and innovation: an experimental investigation. Experimental Economics. 2010;13:439–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana R, Guerzoni M. Incentives and uncertainty: an empirical analysis of the impact of demand on innovation. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2008;32:927–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gächter S, von Kroghb G, Haefligerb S. Initiating private-collective innovation: The fragility of know-ledge sharing. Research Policy. 2010;39:893–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert R, Shapiro C. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics. 1990;21(1): 106–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1984.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z. Patents: recent trends and puzzles. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microecono — mics. 1989;1:291–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature. 1990; 28(4):1661–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Lai E. International Protection of Intellectual Property. NBER Working Paper No. 8704. Cambridge, January 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BH. Industrial Research during the 1980s: Did the Rate of Return Fall?. Cambridge, MA: NBER; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica. 1993;61: 1247–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel G, Niedner S, Herrmann S. Motivation of Software Developers in open source Projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux Kernel. Research Policy. 2003;32:1159–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer P. How broad should the scope of patent protection be? RAND Journal of Economics. 1990;21(1):113–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick AK, Levin RC, Nelson RR, Winter SG. On the source and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy. 1995;24(2):185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai E, Qiu L. The North’s Intellectual Property Rights — Standard for the South? City University of Hong Kong. Working Paper, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin RC. A new look at the patent system. American Economic Review. 1986;76(2):199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin RC, Klevorick NRR, Winter SG. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brooklings Papers on Economic Activity. 1987;3:783–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M, Tang P. Exploring the value of academic patents: IP management practices in UK universities and their implication for third-stream indicators. Scientometrics. 2007;2:415–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J, Hann I-H, Slaughter S. Understanding the motivations participation and performance of open source software developers: a longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Science. 2006;52:984–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M. Patent incentives, technology markets and public-private bio-medical innovation networks in Brazil. World Development. 2010;38(8):1082–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapsalis E, Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. The institutional sources of knowledge and the value of academic patents. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies. 2007;16(2):139–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang J. Competition and Innovation Behaviour. Research Policy. 2006;35:68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E, von Krogh G. Free revealing and the private-collective model of innovation incentives. R&D Management. 2006;36:295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Healthcare Communications Iberica SL.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

García-Fontes, W. (2012). Incentivos para innovar: Una revisión. In: Incentivos a la I+D+i de Medicamentos. Springer Healthcare, Madrid. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-84-938062-9-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-84-938062-9-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer Healthcare, Madrid

  • Print ISBN: 978-84-938062-2-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-84-938062-9-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics