Computation and economics of nodal price in a restructured electricity market

  • S. B. Warkad
  • M. K. Khedkar
  • G. M. Dhole
Conference paper


Since last century, the electrical power industry world wide has been continuously restructured from a centralized monopoly to a competitive market. Under it, competitive market is one of the effective mechanism for energy supply to free the customer’s choices and improve overall social welfare. The aim of this restructuring is to promote competition and to make the electricity market more efficient. Recently, the electric power industry has entered in an increasingly competitive environment under which it becomes more realistic to improve economics and reliability of power systems by enlisting market forces [1]. In developing countries, the trend of electricity market is heading towards Transmission Open Access (TOA) whereby transmission providers will be required to offer the basic transmission service (operational and/or ancillary services) and pricing [2]. Electricity nodal pricing in this context is an effective scheme for providing techno-economic benefits to the market participants. Nodal prices contain valuable information useful for Poolco operation and, hence the scheme is to accurately determine them, continue to be an active area of research.


Reactive Power Electricity Market Spot Price Spot Prex Locational Marginal Price 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Ray and F. Alvarado, “Use of an engineering model foreconomic analysis in the electric utility industry,” presented at the Advanced Workshop on Regulation and Public Utility Economics, The State University of New Jersey, Rutgers University, May 25-27, pp. 23–29, 1988Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Rivier and I. J. Perez-Ariaga, “Computation and decomposition of spot price far transmission pricing,” in 11th PSC conference, Avignon, Francia. Agosto, pp 39–46, 1993Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Finney, H. A. Othman, and W. L. Rutz, “Evaluatingtransmission congestion constraints in system planning,” IEEE Trans. Power Sys., vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1143–1150, Aug. 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. C. Schweppe, M. C. Caramis, R. D. Tabors, R. E. Bohn, Spot Pricing of Electricity, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 384 p. 1988Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. N. Lu, S. S. Chen, C. M. Ong, “The Incorporation of HVDC Equations in Optimal Power Flow Methods using Sequential Quadratic Sequential Quadratic Programming Techniques”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 3, No.3, pp. 1005–1011, August 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kai Xie, Yong-Hua Song, John Stonham, Erkeng Yu, and Guangyi Liu, “Decomposition Model and Interior Point Methods for Optimal Spot Pricing of Electricity in Deregulation Environments”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. I, No. 1, pp. 39–50, February 2000Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Ward, N. R. Watson, C. P. Arnold, A. J. Turner, and B. J. Ring, “Inversion of Real Time Spot Prices in the Direction of Real Power Flow in a Transmission Line”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 15, No. 4, pp 1197–1203, November 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luonan Chen, Hideki Suzuki, Tsunehisa Wachi, and Yukihiro Shimura, “Components of Nodal Prices for Electric Power Systems”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 41–49, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Meliopoulos, S. Kang, G. Cokkinides, R. Dougal, “Animation and Visualization of Spot Prices via Quadratized Power Flow Analysis”, Proceedings of 36th Hawaii International conference on System Sciences (HICSS’03) - Track 2, Vol. 2, pp.49b, January 06–January 09, 2003Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eugene Litvinov, Tongxin Zheng, Gary Rosenwald, and Payman Shamsollahi, “Marginal Loss Modeling in LMP Calculation”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 880–888, May 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tong Wu, Ziad Alaywan, and Alex D. Papalexopoulos, “Locational Marginal Price Calculations Using the Distributed-Slack Power-Flow Formulation”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 1188–1190, May 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hugo A. Gil, Francisco D. Galiana, and Edson L. da Silva, “Nodal Price Control: A Mechanism for Transmission Network Cost Allocation”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 3–10, February 2006Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guang Li, Chen-Ching Liu, Chris Mattson, and Jacques Lawarree, Day- Ahead Electricity Price Forecasting in a Grid Environment”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 266–274, February 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fangxing Li, and Rui Bo, “DCOPF-Based LMP Simulation: Algorithm, Comparison with ACOPF, and Sensitivity”, IEEE Trans. Power Sys.,Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 1475–1485, November 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pandya K.S., Joshi S. K., “A survey of Optimal Power Flow Methods”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 4 No. 5, pp. 450–458, 31st May 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. You, V. Vittal, and X. Wang, “Slow coherency based islanding,” IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 183–491, February, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India Pvt. Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. B. Warkad
    • 1
  • M. K. Khedkar
    • 2
  • G. M. Dhole
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EnggDisha Institute of Management & TechnologyRaipurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EnggVisvesvaraya National Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EnggShri Sant Gajanan Maharaj College of EngineeringShegaonIndia

Personalised recommendations