What Combinations of Contents is Driving Popularity in IPTV-based Social Networks?

  • Rajen Bhatt
Conference paper


IPTV-based Social Networks are gaining popularity with TV programs coming over IP connection and internet like applications available on home TV. One such application is rating TV programs over some predefined genres. In this paper, we suggest an approach for building a recommender system to be used by content distributors, publishers, and motion pictures producers-directors to decide on what combinations of contents may drive popularity or unpopularity. This may be used then for creating a proper mixture of media contents which can drive high popularity. This may also be used for the purpose of catering customized contents for group of users whose taste is similar and thus combinations of contents driving popularity for a certain group is also similar. We use a novel approach for this formulation utilizing fuzzy decision trees. Computational experiments performed over real-world program review database shows that the proposed approach is very efficient towards understanding of the content combinations.


Fuzzy Rule Recommender System Certainty Factor Fuzzy Classification Fuzzy Decision Tree 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    US Patent no-US 2007/0078971, Methods, systems, and computer program products for providing activity data, April 5, (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Patent no-US 2007/0288627, “Method for sensing user presence for buddy list applications,” December 13, (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    US Patent no-US 2007/0204287, Microsoft Corporation, “Content ratings and recommendations,” August 30, (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    US Patent no-US 2007/0277205, SBC Knowledge Ventures L.P. “System and method for distributing video data,” November 29, (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    US Patent no-US 2008/0092199, SBC Knowledge Ventures L.P. “System and method for distributing dynamic event data in an internet protocol television system,” April 17, (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    US Patent no-US 2008/0040742, SBC Knowledge Ventures L.P. “Method and system for inserting advertisement data into an internet protocol television network”, February 14, (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    US Patent no-US 2008/0059998, SBC Knowledge Ventures L.P. “System and method of communicating emergency alterts”, March 6, (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    N.R. Pal and J.C. Bezdek, “On cluster validity for fuzzy c-means model”, IEEE Transactions On Fuzzy Systems, 3, 370–379 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 11.
    Y. Yuan and M.J. Shaw, “Induction of fuzzy decision trees,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69, 125–139, (1995)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 12.
    Rajen B Bhatt, Fuzzy-rough approach to pattern classification: hybrid alogirthms and optimization, PhD Thesis, Electrical Engineering Department, IIT Delhi, India. Call number: 621-52 BHA-F, Accession no: TH-3259,[in=arphd]/.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Bhatt R.B.,: Fuzzy Deicision Trees: Approaches, Advances, and Applications, In: Proceedings of National Conference on Security and Soft Computing (NSSC), pp. 6–10, March 29–31, Surat, India, (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Wang X.-Z., Yeung D.S., Tsang E.C.C.: A comparative study on heuristic algorithms for generating fuzzy decision trees, IEEE Transactions on SMC — B 21, 215–226 (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 15.
    Quinlan J.R, Induction of decision trees, Machine Learning 1, 81–106 (1986)Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Umano M. et. al., “Fuzzy decision tree by fuzzy ID3 algorithm and its application to diagnosis systems”, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 2113–2118, June 26–29, (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Chiang I.-J., jen Hsu J.Y.: Fuzzy classification trees for data analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 130, 87–99 (2002)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 18.
    Jeng B., Jeng Y.-M., Liang T.-P.: FILM: A fuzzy inductive learning method for automated knowledge acquisition, Decision Support Systems 21, 61–73 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 19.
    Ichihashi H., Shirai T., Nagasaka K., Miyoshi T.: Neuro-fuzzy ID3, Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 81, 157–167 (1996)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 20.
    Sison L.G., Chong, E.K.P.: Fuzzy modeling by induction and pruning of decision trees, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, pp. 166–171, Columbus, OH, Aug. (1994)Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Tani T., Sakoda M.: Fuzzy modeling by ID3 algorithm and its application to prediction of outlet temperature, In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 923–930, San Diego, CA, (1992)Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Weber R.: Fuzzy ID3: a class of methods for automatic knowledge acquisition, In: Proceedings of International Conference on Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks, pp. 265–268, Iizuka, Japan (1992).Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    Mitra S., Knowar K.M., Pal S.K.: Fuzzy Decision Tree, Linguistic Rules and Fuzzy Knowledge-Based Network: Generation and Evaluation, IEEE Transactions on SMC-C: Applications and Reviews. 32, 328–339 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Janikow C.Z.: Fuzzy Decision Trees: Issues and Methods. IEEE Transactions on SMC-B: Cybernatics 28, 1–14 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Institute of Information Technology, India 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajen Bhatt
    • 1
  1. 1.Samsung India Software R&D CenterLogix Infotech ParkNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations