Skip to main content

Biomaterials for Inguinal Hernia Repair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Techniques of Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair
  • 917 Accesses

Abstract

Biomaterial has been used for hernia repair since the beginning of hernia treatment. The idea to implant a material with high biocompatibility was already in the mind of surgeons since Billroth: “If we could artificially produce tissues of the density and toughness of the fascia and tendon, the secret of radical cure of hernia can be discovered”. Injection of gold particles and transplantation of autografts such as the lata fascia and dura patches have been used to deal with the defect in the abdominal wall. Pre-fabricated prosthetics made from tantalum gauze and silver-coated wire meshes were abandoned due to high complication rates. Francis Usher implanted the first synthetic mesh made of polypropylene and published his first experimental series of hernia repairs with Marlex mesh in 1959 [1]. Since then the development of meshes has exploded and resulted in biophysical and clinical research in order to find the ideal mesh. Today more than 500 different meshes are on the market offering meshes of different material, size, composition, coating, density and weight, pore-size, structure, flexibility, tensile strength and durability, preformed anatomical shape, self-fixing surface and visibility in imaging techniques. The tremendous choices challenge surgeons and patients on which mesh to choose for the repair of an individual hernia. Detailed knowledge of available biomaterials became therefore a necessary requirement for every hernia surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Skandalakis JE, Colborn GL, Skandalakis LJ, McClusky DA. Historic aspects of groin hernia repair. In: Fitzgibbons RJ, Greenburg AG, editors. Nyhus and Condon’s hernia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams DF, editor. Definitions in biomaterials, Proceedings of a Consensus Conference of the European Society for Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams DF. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klosterhalfen B, Hermanns B, Rosch R. Biological response to mesh. Eur Surg. 2003;35:16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pereira-Lucena CG, Artigiani-Neto R, Lopes-Filho GJ, Frazao CV, Goldenberg A, Matos D, et al. Experimental study comparing meshes made of polypropylene, polypropylene + polyglactin and polypropylene + titanium: inflammatory cytokines, histological changes and morphometric analysis of collagen. Hernia. 2010;14:299–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U. The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:103–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Polymers in hernia repair-common polyester vs. polypropylene surgical meshes. J Mat Sci. 2000;35:4769–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deeken CR, Abdo MS, Frisella MM, Matthews BD. Physicomechanical evaluation of polypropylene, polyester, and polytetrafluoroethylene meshes for inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez R, Ramshaw BJ. Comparison of tissue integration between polyester and polypropylene prostheses in the preperitoneal space. Am Surg. 2003;69:471–6, discussion 476–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Mahajan KC. Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:242–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harth KC, Rosen MJ. Major complications associated with xenograft biologic mesh implantation in abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov. 2009;16(4):324–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bilsel Y, Abci I. The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh, materials and types. Int J Surg. 2012;10(6):317–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown CN, Finch JG. Which mesh for hernia repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(4):272–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, De Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature India Private Limited

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hartung, R.U. (2020). Biomaterials for Inguinal Hernia Repair. In: Chowbey, P., Lomanto, D. (eds) Techniques of Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3944-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3944-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3942-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3944-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics