Skip to main content

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 287 Accesses

Abstract

The recent global crisis which originated in the USA in 2007, and then rapidly spilled over to the rest of the world has had profound implications for economic theory and policy. This chapter delves into the causes of the extent and severity of the crisis. In particular, we try to understand the factors responsible for triggering and perpetuating the crisis in the USA. The latter portion of the chapter is devoted to an evaluation of the policies undertaken by the US Fed and Treasury to control the crisis especially QE (quantitative easing) and fiscal stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As a matter of fact, the first recorded banking crisis seems to have occurred in Rome during the reign of the emperor Tiberius in AD 33 (see Frank 1935).

  2. 2.

    Detailed accounts of the crisis are available in several writings. Of particular relevance are Brunnermeier (2009), Gorton (2008, 2010), Giovanni and Spaventa (2008), etc. The impact of the crisis on India is described in Reddy (2009), Nachane (2009), etc.

  3. 3.

    In India, for example, a long-term fiscal policy outline was announced in December 1985, automatic monetization of the budget deficit via the system of ad hoc Treasury Bills was abandoned in March 1997, monetary targeting was replaced by interest rate targeting around 1997, and the exchange rate regime was progressively liberalized from a pegged system to a managed float over 1992–97.

  4. 4.

    There are several measures used to measure the leverage of a firm. The two measures most in common use are the debt ratio (ratio of total debts to total assets) and the debt-equity ratio (ratio of total debts to total equity).

  5. 5.

    The value-at-risk for a firm’s portfolio is defined as the maximum loss that the firm can expect on that portfolio over a given period with a given probability. Thus, if the value at risk on a portfolio is Rs. 200 million over the next month with a probability of 1%, this would mean that there is a 1% chance that the firm can lose Rs. 200 million on the portfolio over the next month. Usually, the value at risk is stated in terms of confidence levels. Thus, our firm can assert with a 99% confidence level that the maximum loss on its portfolio (over the next month) could be Rs. 200 million.

  6. 6.

    Oil prices since then have been on a steady decline and in July 2016 at $41 per barrel were nearly back to their 1997 levels.

  7. 7.

    On 10 March 2000, NASDAQ reached its peak at 5048, but went into a continuous side thereafter falling to 68% of its peak value on 17 September 2001.

  8. 8.

    Because the GFC originated in the USA, we have focused on the developments there. Developments elsewhere in the world, especially the OECD and EMEs (including India) were broadly similar—any differences being of degree rather than kind.

  9. 9.

    FICO refers to Fair, Isaac & Co.

  10. 10.

    Acronym for “originate-to-distribute” model, as the original mortgages are now removed from the bank’s books and the risk of default is correspondingly shifted from banks to investors in the MBS. Banks favoured the new arrangement as it released valuable capital for them to expand their loan base.

  11. 11.

    Under SIVA (stated income, verified assets) loans proof of income was replaced with a “statement” on faith. NIVA(no income, verified assets) loans replaced proof of employment requirements with a proof of money in borrowers’ bank accounts, whereas “No Income, No Assets” (NINA) or Ninja loans were based only on credit scores, with no proof of any owned assets.

  12. 12.

    Within the ARM there were further options. The interest-only ARM, allowed the homeowner to pay only the interest (not principal) of the mortgage during an initial “teaser” period. Even looser was the payment option ARM loan, in which the homeowner has the option to make monthly payment that does not even cover the interest for the first two or three years of the loan.

  13. 13.

    On a personal note, while pursuing my post-graduate courses more than 40 years ago I used to marvel at the high abstraction levels of mathematical concepts like rings, ideals and conformal mappings. Little did I know that one day these very same concepts would be put to such profitable private, and devastating public, uses!

  14. 14.

    There are several (closely related) definitions of systemic risk and we mention here the two most commonly used. The G-10 (2001) define systemic risk as “the risk that an event will trigger a loss of economic value or confidence in, and attendant increases in uncertainty about, a substantial portion of the financial system that is serious enough to quite probably have adverse effects on the real economy”, whereas the IMF (2009) definition runs somewhat parallel as “a risk of disruption to financial services that is (i) caused by an impairment of all or parts of the financial system and (ii) has the potential to have serious negative consequences for the real economy”.

  15. 15.

    A VaR gives the maximum loss that a bank may have to incur on its portfolio with a specific probability. Thus, a VaR of Rs. 10 million at 1% significance means that the there is a chance of 1%, that the bank may sustain a loss exceeding Rs. 10 million on its portfolio or 99% of the time its loss is guaranteed to remain below that amount.

  16. 16.

    The US stock market peaked in October 2007, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average index exceeded 14,000 points. It then entered a pronounced decline, which accelerated markedly in October 2008.

  17. 17.

    This refusal came after both the Bank of America and Barclays Bank refused to buy out Lehman Bros’ nearly $50 billion of soured real estate mortgages (including an estimated $17 billion of MBS).

  18. 18.

    The Federal Reserve Banks offer three discount window programs to depository institutions: primary credit, secondary credit and seasonal credit, each with its own interest rate. Primary credit refers to very short-term (usually overnight) loans extended to banks and other depository institutions in sound financial condition. This rate is slightly higher than the federal funds rate. Less sound financial institutions are allotted secondary credit from the discount window at rates higher than the primary credit rate. Seasonal credit is extended to relatively small depositories with recurring seasonal fluctuations in funding needs, mainly agricultural credit banks. The discount rate for seasonal credit is an average of selected market rates.

  19. 19.

    All depository institutions that were eligible to borrow under the primary credit program were eligible to participate in TAF auctions. Each TAF auction was for a fixed amount, with the rate determined by the auction process (subject to a minimum bid rate). The TAF was discontinued on March 8, 2010.

  20. 20.

    The TSLF was addressed to provision of liquidity to primary dealers, during periods of heightened collateral market pressure. Under this program, the FRB loaned relatively liquid Treasury Securities for a fee to primary dealers for one month, in exchange for eligible collateral consisting of other, less liquid securities. The TSLF programme was initiated in March 2008 and was discontinued in February 2010.

  21. 21.

    The AMLF provided funding to US depository institutions to finance their purchases of high-quality asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) from money market mutual funds under certain conditions. The program was intended to foster liquidity in the ABCP market and money markets more generally. The AMLF ran from September 2008 to February 2010.

  22. 22.

    The fiscal multiplier is simply the ratio of the change in output \( \Delta Y\left( t \right) \) in response to a fiscal stimulus \( \Delta B\left( t \right). \) One can distinguish between the impact multiplier \( \left( {\Delta Y\left( t \right)/ \Delta B\left( t \right)} \right) \), the multiplier at horizon k \( \left( {\Delta Y\left( {t + k} \right)/\Delta B\left( t \right)} \right) \), the peak multiplier \( \underbrace {Max}_{0 \le k \le N}\left( {\Delta Y\left( {t + k} \right)/\Delta B\left( t \right)} \right) \) over any horizon N, and the cumulative (total) multiplier at horizon N, \( \left\{ {\frac{{\left[ {\mathop \sum \nolimits_{k = 0}^{N} \Delta Y\left( {t + k} \right)} \right]}}{{\left[ {\mathop \sum \nolimits_{k = 0}^{N} \Delta B\left( {t + k} \right)} \right]}}} \right\} \) (see Spilimbergo et al. 2009).

  23. 23.

    Countries which acquired OECD membership after 2010 (such as Chile, Latvia.) are also excluded.

  24. 24.

    The calculation of these multipliers is based on the 2002 version of the OECD-INTERLINK Model (see Box 3.1 OECD 2009).

  25. 25.

    A substantial part of the US fiscal stimulus (about 13.7% as per the ILO estimates and about 8.9% as per the OECD estimates—see Table 6) was also spent on direct transfers to those households adversely affected by the crisis, and the economically vulnerable. About $48 billion was allotted to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP) which provided assistance to low-income families in the form of food vouchers. On the health front, the stimulus provided for premium reductions for health benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( COBRA), which gave workers, who had lost their health benefits the right to purchase group health coverage.

References

  • Acharya, V., Gale, D. & Yorulmazer, T. (2011, August). Rollover risk and market freezes. Journal of Finance, 66(4), 1177–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adrian, T., & Shin, H. (2009). Financial intermediaries and monetary economics. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no 398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Babus, A., & Carletti, E. (2009, November). Financial crises: Theory and evidence. Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, 1(1), 97–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunbas, Y., Gambacorta, L., & Marqués Ibañez, D. (2009). An empirical assessment of the risk-taking channel. Paper presented at the BIS/ECB conference on “Monetary policy and financial stability”, 10–11 Sept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J., Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2004). Bank regulation and supervision: What works best? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 205–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, C., & Benati, L. (2010). Unconventional monetary policy and the great recession—Estimating the impact of a compression in the yield spread at the zero lower bound. Working Paper Series No. 1258, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, C. (2009, August 25). The great moderation, the great panic and the great contraction. Schumpeter Lecture, Annual Congress of the European Economic Association, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (2009). Fiscal stimulus packages: What are their effects? The Becker-Posner Blog. http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/2010/03/fiscal-stimulus-packages-what-are-their-effects-becker.html.

  • Bernanke, B. (2005, March 10). The global saving glut and the US current account deficit. Federal Reserve Board: Speech at the Sandridge Lecture, Virginia Association of Economists, Richmond, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. (2009, January 13). The crisis and the policy response. Stamp Lecture, London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1996, February). The financial accelerator and the flight to quality. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibow, J. (2008). The international monetary (non)-order and the global capital flows paradox. Working Paper No. 531. The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankfein, L. (2009, February 8). Do not destroy the essential catalyst of risk. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2010, December 21). The debt-inflation cycle and the global financial crisis. Retrieved from SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1729228.

  • Bookstabber, R. (2007). A demon of our own design: Markets, hedge funds and the perils of financial innovation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M., Eichengreen, B., Klingbiel, D., & Martinez-Peria, M. (2001, April). Is the crisis problem growing more severe. Economic Policy, 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borio, C., & Disyatat, P. (2011). Global imbalances and the financial crisis: Link or no link? BIS Working Papers No 346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borio, C., & Zhu, H. (2008). Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: A missing link in the transmission mechanism? BIS Working Papers, No 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broer, T., & Kero, A. (2011, December). Great moderation or great mistake? Can rising confidence in low macro-risk explain the boom in asset prices. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP 8700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009, Winter). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canterberry, E. R. (2011). The global great recession (p. 7896). World Scientific Publication No: World Scientific Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J. (2010). How markets fail: The logic of economic calamities. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetorelli, N., & Persitiani, P. (2012). Credit quantity and credit quality: Bank competition and capital accumulation. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(3), 967–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H., Laforte, J. P., Reifschneider, D., & Williams, J. C. (2012). Have we underestimated the likelihood and severity of zero lower bound events? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(Supplement), 47–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., & Ratnovski, L. (2014, February). What is shadow banking? IMF Working Paper, WP/14/25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, T. F. (2008, November 12). How we got here: From the great moderation to the great conflagration. Forbes Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, J. (2009, July). Structural causes of the global financial crisis: A critical assessment of the ‘new financial architecture’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4), 563–580. (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson, J., Shin, H., & Zigrand, J. (2004). The impact of risk regulation on price dynamics. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28, 1069–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. (2005). Credit derivatives, CDOs and structured credit products (3rd ed.). Singapore: Wiley (Asia).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, B. (2011). Grasping reality with both hands. Retrieved from http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/07/three-flavors-of-the-economic-crisis.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BradDelongsSemi-dailyJournal+%28Brad+DeLong%27s+Semi-Daily+Journal%29.

  • DiNapoli, T. P. (2009). Wall Street bonuses rose sharply in 2009. Retrieved from https://www.osc/ny.us/osdc/wallst_bonuses/2010/022310.htm.

  • Dooley, M., Folkerts-Landau, D., & Garber, P. (2009, August). Bretton Woods II still defines the international monetary system. Pacific Economic Review, 14(3), 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotsey, M. (2016). Monetary policy and the new normal. Economic Insights, 1(1) (First Quarter), FRB of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunaway, S. (2009). Global imbalances and the financial crisis. Council on Foreign Relations, Special Report, no 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymski, G. A. (2010). Why the subprime crisis is different: A Minskyian approach. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(2), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, G. B., & Woodford, M. (2004, May). Policy options in a liquidity trap. American Economic Review, Papers & Proceedings, 94, 76–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawley, B., & Neely, C. J. (2013). Four stories of quantitative easing. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 95(1), 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (2009). Rethinking the role of fiscal policy. American Economic Review, 99(2), 556–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, T. (1935). The financial crisis of 33 A.D. The American Journal of Philology, 56(4), 336–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, C., Kumhof, M., Laxton, D., & Lee, J. (2009). The case for global fiscal stimulus. IMF Staff Position Note 09/03.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSB (Financial Stability Board). (2012). Global shadow banking monitoring report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambacorta, L. (2009, December). Monetary policy and the risk-taking channel. BIS Quarterly Review, 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanni, A., & Spaventa, L. (2008). Filling the information gap. In A. Felton, & C. Reinhart (Eds.), The first global financial crisis of the 21st century. http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/690.

  • Gorton, G. B. (2008). The subprime panic. NBER Working Papers 14398. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, G. B. (2010). Slapped by the invisible hand: The panic of 2007. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, A. G. (2009, April 28). Rethinking the financial network speech (Financial Student Association, Amsterdam), Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E. (2009). By how much does GDP rise if the government buys more output? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 183–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G., & Vegh, C. A. (2013). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics, 60, 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO-EC-IILS. (2011). A review of global fiscal stimulus. Joint Discussion Paper Series No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2009, March). Global economic policies and prospects. IMF Staff Note for the G20 Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2010, April). World economic outlook: Rebalancing growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2011, September). World economic outlook: Slowing growth, rising risks.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2012, April). World economic outlook: Growth resuming, dangers remain.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2015a, October). World economic outlook: Adjusting to Lower Commodity Prices.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2015b, January). International jobs report. OCP Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Kwak, J. (2010). Bankers: The Wall Street takeover and the next financial meltdown. New York: Pantheon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, M., Miles, D., Scott, A., & Vayanos, D. (2012). Quantitative easing and unconventional monetary policy—An introduction. Economic Journal, 122(564), F271–F288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. P., & Aliber, R. (2005) [1978]. Manias, panics, and crashes: A history of financial crises. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Investment Classics, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, D. (2010, May 11). Global imbalances. Speech delivered at the High-Level Conference on the International Monetary System, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, A. (2003). Exploring the limitations of value at risk: How good is it in practice? The Journal of Risk Finance, 4(2), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2009, March 20). The great recession versus the great depression. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, C. (2014, July 11). Fed critics: Good riddance to quantitative easing. Fortune.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., & Blanchard, O. J. ( 2009). Global imbalances; In Midstream? IMF Staff Position Notes, 2009/29, International Monetary Fund.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. (1986). Stabilising an unstable economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. (1992). The financial instability hypothesis. Working Paper No. 74, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, J. (2009). The case against the fiscal stimulus. Available at https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/articles/miron-harvardlawreview.pdf.

  • Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2009). Global imbalances and the financial crisis: Products of common causes. CEPR Discussion Paper, no 7606.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, G. P., Jr. (2009). Money and the present crisis. Cato Journal, 29(1), 167–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou, D. B., & Wray, L. R. (1997, June). A tribute to Hyman P. Minsky. Journal of Economic Issues, 31(2), 491–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, H. (2010). On the brink. London: Headline Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. (2005). Has financial development made the world riskier? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, no 11728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C., & Rogoff, K. (2011). This time is different: Eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibert, A. (2010). Global imbalances and the financial crisis. European Parliament, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policies. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201003/20100309ATT70189/20100309ATT70189EN.pdf.

  • Sinapi, C. (2011). Institutional prerequisites of financial fragility within minsky’s financial instability hypothesis: A proposal in terms of “institutional” fragility. Working Paper No. 674, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaghi, L. B. (2009, April 28). Conventional and unconventional monetary policy. Keynote Lecture at the International Centre for Monetary and Banking Studies (ICMB), Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilimbergo, A, Symansky, S. A., Cottarelli, C., & Blanchard, O. J. (2009). Fiscal policy for the crisis. IMF Staff Position Notes 2008/01, International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suominen, K. (2010, June 14). Did global imbalances cause the crisis? VOX CEPR’s Policy Portal. http://voxeu.org/article/did-global-imbalances-cause-crisis.

  • Taylor, J. (2009). The financial crisis and the policy responses: An empirical analysis of what went wrong. NBER Working Papers, no 14631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelman, J. H. (2010). Austrian business cycle theory and the global financial crisis: Confessions of a mainstream economist. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 13(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2014). 12th April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2012, July 14). QE, or not QE? An assessment of the most controversial weapon in the central banker’s armoury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trichet, J.-C. (2008, September 5). Risk and the macro-economy. Keynote Address at the Conference “The ECB and its Watchers X”. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, P. (2012). Bank dependence and investment during the financial crisis. Research Bulletin, European Central Bank, 17, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volcker, P. (2008). Rethinking the bright new world of global finance. International Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2362.2007.00211.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Heideken, V. Q. (2009). How important are financial frictions in the United States and the Euro Area? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111(3), 567–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, P. (2009). Containing systemic risk. European Parliament, Policy Department No. 2009-11. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10197/1672.

  • Wilson, D. J. (2011). Fiscal spending jobs multipliers: Evidence from the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Working Paper 2010–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nachane, D.M. (2018). Inception of the Global Crisis in the USA. In: Critique of the New Consensus Macroeconomics and Implications for India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3920-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3920-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3918-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3920-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics