Skip to main content

Accrual Budgeting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Budgeting in India

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 255 Accesses

Abstract

The new public management systems emphasising on the transparency, cost-effectiveness and managerial flexibility have suggested moving away from cash-based budgeting to accrual-based budgeting. This article offers an analysis of the limitations and benefits of cash and accrual systems. An attempt is also made to evaluate the experiences of New Zealand and Australia with accrual budgeting in order to gain insights into how accrual budgeting has impacted in areas of public performance, sustainability and accountability. The paper further examines the prospects of introducing accrual accounting and budgeting in India, based on the insights gained from the experiences of New Zealand and Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rayegan et al. (2012), p. 525.

  2. 2.

    Wynne (2003), p. 3.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    Ibid.

  5. 5.

    Hepworth (2002), p. 4.

  6. 6.

    US GAO (2000), p. 197.

  7. 7.

    Das (2006), ix.

  8. 8.

    World Bank (2002), p. 2.

  9. 9.

    US GAO (2000), p. 193.

  10. 10.

    US GAO (2000), p. 196.

  11. 11.

    US GAO (2000), p. 193.

  12. 12.

    Das (2006), p. 8.

  13. 13.

    Algemene (2007), p. 10.

  14. 14.

    Algemene (2007), p. 11.

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    US GAO (2000), p. 203.

  17. 17.

    Algemene (2007), p. 12.

  18. 18.

    US GAO (2000), p. 204.

  19. 19.

    Ibid.

  20. 20.

    Meyers (2009), p. 216.

  21. 21.

    Ball et al. (2000), p. 8.

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Algemene (2007), p. 12.

  24. 24.

    Blondal (2004), p. 116.

  25. 25.

    Ibid.

  26. 26.

    US GAO (2000), pp. 216–7.

  27. 27.

    Algemene (2007), p. 12.

  28. 28.

    Blondal (2004), p. 116.

  29. 29.

    US GAO (2000), p. 218.

  30. 30.

    Shah (2007), p. 9.

  31. 31.

    GASAB (2015), p. 10.

  32. 32.

    Shah (2007), p. 9.

  33. 33.

    GASAB (2015), p. 5.

  34. 34.

    GASAB (2015), p. 10.

  35. 35.

    US GAO (2000), p. 222.

  36. 36.

    GASAB (2015), p. 6.

  37. 37.

    Ibid.

  38. 38.

    Ibid.

  39. 39.

    Das (2006), p. 48.

  40. 40.

    Algemene (2007), p. 66.

  41. 41.

    Algemene (2007), p. 65.

  42. 42.

    Das (2006), p. 53.

  43. 43.

    OECD (1993), p. 40.

  44. 44.

    Algemene (2007), p. 65.

  45. 45.

    Das (2006), pp. 53–4.

  46. 46.

    Das (2006), p. 56.

  47. 47.

    Das (2006), pp. 63–4.

  48. 48.

    Das (2006), p. 64.

  49. 49.

    Algemene (2007), p. 67.

  50. 50.

    Ibid, p. 67.

  51. 51.

    Das (2006), pp. 68–9.

  52. 52.

    Algemene (2007), p. 68.

  53. 53.

    Das (2006), p. 54.

  54. 54.

    Algemene (2007), p. 68.

  55. 55.

    Das (2006), p. 54.

  56. 56.

    Ibid, p. 70.

  57. 57.

    OECD (1993), p. 26.

  58. 58.

    Ibid.

  59. 59.

    Ibid.

  60. 60.

    Das (2006), p. 73.

  61. 61.

    OECD (1993), pp. 27–8.

  62. 62.

    Das (2006), p. 74.

  63. 63.

    Ibid.

  64. 64.

    OECD (1993), p. 28.

  65. 65.

    Das (2006), p. 76.

  66. 66.

    Algemene (2007), p. 71.

  67. 67.

    Algemene (2007), p. 72.

  68. 68.

    Algemene (2007), p. 73.

  69. 69.

    Das (2006), p. 77.

  70. 70.

    Ibid.

  71. 71.

    Algemene (2007), p. 74.

  72. 72.

    US GAO (2000), p. 209.

  73. 73.

    Ibid.

  74. 74.

    Das (2006), p. 69.

  75. 75.

    US GAO (2000), p. 211.

  76. 76.

    Das (2006), p. 196.

  77. 77.

    US GAO (2000), p. 212.

  78. 78.

    Ibid.

  79. 79.

    Das (2006), pp. 146–7.

  80. 80.

    Das (2006), p. 86.

  81. 81.

    Das (2006), p. 69.

  82. 82.

    US GAO (2000), p. 219.

  83. 83.

    US GAO (2000), p. 222.

  84. 84.

    Das (2006), p. 17.

  85. 85.

    Ibid.

  86. 86.

    Kothari (2013), p. 2.

  87. 87.

    Ministry of Finance (2005).

  88. 88.

    Jena (2013), p. 7.

  89. 89.

    Sasidharan (2011), p. 275.

  90. 90.

    Ibid.

  91. 91.

    Ibid.

  92. 92.

    Ibid.

  93. 93.

    Rai (2011), pp. 5–6.

  94. 94.

    Sasidharan (2011), p. 277.

  95. 95.

    Ibid.

  96. 96.

    Rai (2011), p. 6.

  97. 97.

    Ibid.

  98. 98.

    Jena (2013), pp. 7–8.

  99. 99.

    Rai (2011), p. 7.

  100. 100.

    Jena (2013), p. 8.

  101. 101.

    Rai (2011), p. 7.

  102. 102.

    Ibid.

  103. 103.

    Ibid.

  104. 104.

    Rai (2011), p. 9.

  105. 105.

    Ibid.

  106. 106.

    Ministry of Finance (2011), p. 1.

  107. 107.

    Rai (2011), p. 12.

  108. 108.

    Adwaith (2011), p. 1.

  109. 109.

    Jena (2012).

  110. 110.

    GASAB (2015), p. 8.

  111. 111.

    Das (2006), pp. 56–7.

  112. 112.

    GASAB (2015), p. 8.

  113. 113.

    Ibid.

  114. 114.

    Ramakrishnan and Sivabalan (2011), p. 1.

References

  • Adwaith. (2011). The concept, mechanism and advantages of accrual accounting in India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algemene R. (2007). Accrual budgeting and accounting in central government: Budgets and accounts in balance. The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondal, J. (2003). Accrual accounting and budgeting: Key issues and recent development. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondal, J. R. (2004). Issues in accrual budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 4(1), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. K. (2006). Rethinking public accounting: Policy and practice of accrual accounting in government. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehsan, R., Parveizi, M., & Nazari, K., et al. (2012). Government accounting: An assessment of theory, purposes and standards. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 521–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO, A. B. (2000). Experiences of other nations and implications for the United States. GAO-AIMD-00-57, pp 193–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • GASAB (Government Accounting Standards Advisory Board). (2015). Primer on accrual accounting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth, N. (2002). Changing to accrual accounting in Central Government (with special reference to the experiences of the United Kingdom). Norway: Institute of Public Finance Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena, P. R. (2012). Public financial management in India: Reforms and scope for innovations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena, P. R. (2013). Improving public financial management in India: Opportunities to move forward. Working Paper No. 2013-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S. S. (2013). Government accounting—Accrual is the way to go. The Hindu Business Line, 8 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, R. T. (2009). Ball of confusion’ in federal budgeting: A shadow agenda for deliberative reform of the budget process. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance. (2005). Main recommendations of the twelfth finance commission. Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1993). Accounting for what? The value of accrual accounting to the public sector. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIB. (2011). Identify steps necessary for introduction of accrual accounting. FM Inaugurates Conference of State Finance Ministers, 21 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan, V., & Sivabalan, S. (2011). In search of a Kautilya. The Hindu Business Line, February 16, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasidharan, K. P. (2011). Reforms in government accounting and financial reporting. The Chartered Accountant 60(2), 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, A. (2007). Performance budgeting and accrual budgeting: Decision rules or analytic tools? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(2), 109 (World Bank, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (Ed.). (2007). Budgeting and budgetary institutions. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002). Accrual accounting and budgeting: Key issues and recent developments. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, A. (2003). Do private sector financial statements provide a suitable model for public sector accounts? European Group of Public Administration, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Das .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Das, S.K. (2018). Accrual Budgeting. In: Karnam, G. (eds) Public Budgeting in India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3917-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3917-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3915-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3917-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics