Advertisement

Recent Progress in the Genetic Engineering of Biofuel Crops

Chapter

Abstract

The utilization of biomass energy is increasingly considered as a promising means for the sustainable supply of energy and for long-term conservation of the global environment. In order to achieve the effective production of biomass-based energy, a key challenge will be the breeding of biofuel crops that enable high and stable biomass production. In this context, genetic engineering to optimize metabolism, create value-added biomass production, and enable environmental adaptability for growth on marginal land will be instrumental for establishing the next generation of biofuel crops. This review focuses on recent progress in the development of dedicated biofuel crops by means of genetic engineering, particularly switchgrass for lignocellulosic feedstock and jatropha and camelina for biodiesel feedstock.

Keywords

Arid region Biofuel crop Biomass production Genetic engineering Transgenic plants 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) program by Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)/Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), the Cooperative Research Grant of the Gene Research Center, University of Tsukuba, the Joint Research Program and the MRA Project of the Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS to K.A. (17K07755).

References

  1. Anderson AJ, Dawes EA (1990) Occurrence, metabolism, metabolic role, and industrial uses of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microbiol Rev 54:450–472Google Scholar
  2. Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E (1999) Salt tolerance conferred by over expression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285:1256–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter HL, Mazarei M, Labbe N, Kline LM, Cheng Q, Windham MT, Mann DGJ, Fu C, Ziebell A, Sykes RW, Rodriguez M Jr, Davis MF, Mielenz JR, Dixon RA, Wang Z-Y, Stewart CN Jr (2014) Two-year field analysis of reduced recalcitrance transgenic switchgrass. Plant Biotechnol J 12:914–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumwald E (2000) Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:431–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonawitz ND, Chapple C (2010) The genetics of lignin biosynthesis: connecting genotype to phenotype. Annu Rev Genet 44:337–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonawitz ND, Chapple C (2013) Can genetic engineering of lignin deposition be accomplished without an unacceptable yield penalty? Curr Opin Biotechnol 24:336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buhr T, Sato S, Ebrahim F, Xing A, Zhou Y, Mathiesen M, Schweiger B, Kinney A, Staswick P (2002) Ribozyme termination of RNA transcripts down-regulate seed fatty acid genes in transgenic soybean. Plant J 30:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chee PP, Fober KA, Slightom JL (1989) Transformation of soybean (Glycine max) by infecting germinating seeds with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol 91:1212–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen F, Dixon RA (2007) Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat Biotechnol 25:759–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choudhury R, Riesselman AJ, Pandey S (2014) Constitutive or seed-specific overexpression of Arabidopsis G-protein γ subunit 3 (AGG3) results in increased seed and oil production and improved stress tolerance in Camelina sativa. Plant Biotechnol J 12:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudley B (2014) BP statistical review of world energy. http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview
  12. Durrett TP, Benning C, Ohlrogge J (2008) Plant triacylglycerols as feedstocks for the production of biofuels. Plant J 54:593–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eastmond PJ (2006) SUGAR-DEPENDENT 1 encodes a patatin domain triacylglycerol lipase that initiates storage oil breakdown in germinating Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell 18:665–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fu C, Mielenz JR, Xiao X, Ge Y, Hamilton CY, Rodriguez M, Chen F, Foston M, Ragauskas A, Bouton J, Dixon RA, Wang ZY (2011) Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3803–3808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu C, Sunkar R, Zhou C, Shen H, Zhang J-Y, Matts J, Wolf J, Mann DGJ, Stewart CN Jr, Tang Y, Wang Z-Y (2012) Overexpression of miR156 in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) results in various morphological alterations and leads to improved biomass production. Plant Biotechnol J 10:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Girijashankar V, Swathisree V (2009) Genetic transformation of Sorghum bicolor. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 15:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gou J-Y, Felippes FF, Liu C-J, Weigel D, Wang J-W (2011) Negative regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by a miR156-targeted SPL transcription factor. Plant Cell 23:1512–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gu K, Mao H, Yin Z (2014) Production of marker-free transgenic Jatropha curcas expressing hybrid Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin Cry1Ab/1Ac for resistance to larvae of tortrix moth (Archips micaceanus). Biotechnol Biofuels 7:68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo D, Chen F, Inoue K, Blount JW, Dixon RA (2001) Downregulation of caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase and caffeoyl CoA 3-O-methyltransferase in transgenic alfalfa: impacts on lignin structure and implications for the biosynthesis of G and S lignin. Plant Cell 13:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hao Y, Charles TC, Glick BR (2010) ACC deaminase increases the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation frequency of commercial canola cultivars. FEMS Microbiol Lett 307:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Homrich MS, Wiebke-Strohm B, Weber RLM, Bodanese-Zanettini MH (2012) Soybean genetic transformation: a valuable tool for the functional study of genes and the production of agronomically improved plants. Genet Mol Biol 35:998–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howe A, Sato S, Dweikat I, Fromm M, Clemente T (2006) Rapid and reproducible Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum. Plant Cell Rep 25:784–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jakob K, Zhou F, Paterson A (2009) Genetic improvement of C4 grasses as cellulosic biofuel feedstocks. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jha B, Mishra A, Jha A, Joshi M (2013) Developing transgenic Jatropha using the SbNHX1 gene from an extreme halophyte for cultivation in saline wasteland. PLoS One 8:e71136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jung JH, Fouad WM, Vermerris W, Gallo M, Altpeter F (2012) RNAi suppression of lignin biosynthesis in sugarcane reduces recalcitrance for biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass. Plant Biotechnol J 10:1067–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kajikawa M, Morikawa K, Inoue M, Widyastuti U, Suharsono S, Yokota A, Akashi K (2012) Establishment of bispyribac selection protocols for Agrobacterium tumefaciens- and Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of the oil seed plant Jatropha curcas L. Plant Biotechnol 29:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly AA, Shaw E, Powers SJ, Kurup S, Eastmond PJ (2013) Suppression of the SUGAR-DEPENDENT 1 triacylglycerol lipase family during seed development enhances oil yield in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) Plant Biotechnol J 11:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim MJ, Yang SW, Mao HZ, Veena SP, Yin JL, Chua NH (2014) Gene silencing of sugar-dependent 1 (JcSDP1), encoding a patatin-domain triacylglycerol lipase, enhances seed oil accumulation in Jatropha curcas. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King ZR, Bray AL, LaFayette PR, Parrott WA (2014) Biolistic transformation of elite genotype of switchgrass. Plant Cell Rep 33:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lardizabal K, Effertz R, Levering C, Mai J, Pedroso MC, Jury T, Aasen E, Gruys K, Bennett K (2008) Expression of Umbelopsis ramanniana DGAT2A in seed increases oil in soybean. Plant Physiol 148:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee SB, Kim H, Kim RJ, Suh MC (2014) Overexpression of Arabidopsis MYB96 confers drought resistance in Camelina sativa via cuticular wax accumulation. Plant Cell Rep 33:1535–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li M, Li H, Jiang H, Pan X, Wu G (2008) Establishment of an Agrobacterium-mediated cotyledon disc transformation method for Jatropha curcas. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 92:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li C, Luo L, Fu Q, Niu L, Xu Z-F (2014) Isolation and functional characterization of JcFT, a FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) homologous gene from the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas. BMC Plant Biol 14:125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lu C, Kang J (2008) Generation of transgenic plants of a potential oilseed crop Camelina sativa by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep 27:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manickavasagam M, Ganapathi A, Anbazhagan VR, Sudhakar B, Selvaraj N, Vasudevan A, Kasthurirengan S (2004) Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and development of herbicide-resistant sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrids) using axillary buds. Plant Cell Rep 23:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mann DGJ, King ZR, Liu W, Joyce BL, Percifield RJ, Hawkins JS, LaFayette PR, Artelt BJ, Burris JN, Mazarei M, Bennetzen JL, Parrott WA, Stewart CN Jr (2011) Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) polyubiquitin gene (PvUbi1 and PvUbi2) promoters for use in plant transformation. BMC Biotechnol 11:74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayavan S, Subramanyam K, Arun M, Rajesh M, Kapil Dev G, Sivanandhan G, Jaganath B, Manickavasagam M, Selvaraj N, Ganapathi A (2013) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated in planta seed transformation strategy in sugarcane. Plant Cell Rep 32:1557–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McQualter RB, Somleva MN, Gebbie LK, Li X, Petrasovits LA, Snell KD, Nielsen LK, Brumbley SM (2014) Factors affecting polyhydroxybutyrate accumulation in mesophyll cells of sugarcane and switchgrass. BMC Biotechnol 14:83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Misra A, Khan K, Niranjan A, Nath P, Sane VA (2013) Over-expression of JcDGAT1 from Jatropha curcas increases seed oil levels and alters oil quality in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 96:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nonaka S, Sugawara M, Minamisawa K, Yuhashi K, Ezura H (2008) 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase enhances Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer into plant cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2526–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Park W, Feng Y, Ahn S-J (2014) Alteration of leaf shape, improved metal tolerance, and productivity of seed by overexpression of CsHMA3 in Camelina sativa. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patade VY, Khatri D, Kumar K, Grover A, Kumari M, Gupta SM, Kumar D, Nasim M (2014) RNAi mediated curcin precursor gene silencing in Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) Mol Biol Rep 41:4305–4312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pauly M, Keegstra K (2008) Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J 54:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qu J, Mao H-Z, Chen W, Gao S-Q, Bai Y-N, Sun Y-W, Geng Y-F, Ye J (2012) Development of marker-free transgenic Jatropha plants with increased levels of seed oleic acid. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Que Q, Elumalai S, Li X, Zhong H, Nalapalli S, Schweiner M, Fei X, Nuccio M, Kelliher T, Gu W, Chen Z, Chilton MDM (2014) Maize transformation technology development for commercial event generation. Front Plant Sci 2014:379Google Scholar
  46. Rhodes CA, Pierce DA, Mettler IJ, Mascarenhas D, Detmer JJ (1988) Genetically transformed maize plants from protoplasts. Science 240:204–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saathoff AJ, Sarath G, Chow EK, Dien BS, Tobias CM (2011) Downregulation of cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase in switchgrass by RNA silencing results in enhanced glucose release after cellulose treatment. PLoS One 6:e16416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sang Y, Millwood RJ, Neal Stewart C Jr (2013) Gene use restriction technologies for transgenic plant bioconfinement. Plant Biotechnol J 11:649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seo PJ, Lee SB, Suh MC, Park MJ, Go YS, Park CM (2011) The MYB96 transcription factor regulates cuticular wax biosynthesis under drought conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23:1138–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snapp AR, Kang J, Qi X, Lu C (2014) A fatty acid condensing enzyme from Physaria fendleri increases hydroxy fatty acid accumulation in transgenic oilseeds of Camelina sativa. Planta 240:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snell KD, Peoples OP (2009) PHA bioplastic: a value-added coproduct for biomass biorefineries. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 3:456–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Someya T, Nonaka S, Nakamura K, Ezura H (2013) Increased 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase activity enhances Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene delivery into plant cells. Microbiol Open 2:873–880Google Scholar
  53. Somleva MN, Tomaszewski Z, Conger BV (2002) Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of switchgrass. Crop Sci 42:2080–2087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Somleva MN, Snell KD, Beaulieu JJ, Peoples OP, Garrison BR, Patterson NA (2008) Production of polyhydroxybutyrate in switchgrass, a value-added co-product in an important lignocellulosic biomass crop. Plant Biotechnol J 6:663–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Somleva MN, Xu CA, Ryan KP, Thilmony R, Peoples O, Snell KD, Thomson J (2014) Transgene autoexcision in switchgrass pollen mediated by the Bxb1 recombinase. BMC Biotechnol 14:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sticklen MB (2008) Plant genetic engineering for biofuel production: towards affordable cellulosic ethanol. Nat Rev Genet 9:433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suriyamongkol P, Weselake R, Narine S, Moloney M, Shah S (2007) Biotechnological approaches for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates in microorganisms and plants – a review. Biotechnol Adv 25:148–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsuchimoto S, Cartagena J, Khemkladngoen N, Singkaravanit S, Kohinata T, Wada N, Sakai H, Morishita Y, Suzuki H, Shibata D, Fukui K (2012) Development of transgenic plants in Jatropha with drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol 29:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vigeolas H, Waldeck P, Zank T, Geigenberger P (2007) Increasing seed oil content in oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) by overexpression of a yeast glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase under the control of a seed-specific promoter. Plant Biotechnol J 5:431–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang X, Yamada T, Kong F-J, Abe Y, Hoshino Y, Sato H, Takamizo T, Kanazawa A, Yamada T (2011) Establishment of an efficient in vitro culture and particle bombardment-mediated transformation system in Miscanthus sinensis Anderss., a potential bioenergy crop. GCB Bioenergy 3:322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weng JK, Li X, Bonawitz ND, Chapple C (2008) Emerging strategies of lignin engineering and degradation for cellulosic biofuel production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wigge PA (2011) FT, a mobile developmental signal in plants. Curr Biol 21:R374–R378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams LE, Mills RF (2005) P(1B)-ATPases – an ancient family of transition metal pumps with diverse functions in plants. Trends Plant Sci 10:491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu G, Park MY, Conway SR, Wang J-W, Weigel D, Poethig RS (2009) The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell 138:750–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Xing S, Salinas M, Hohmann S, Berndtgen R, Huijser P (2010) miR156-targeted and nontargeted SBP-Box transcription factors act in concert to secure male fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22:3935–3950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xu B, Escamilla-Treviño LL, Sathitsuksanoh N, Shen Z, Shen H, Zhang YH, Dixon RA, Zhao B (2011) Silencing of 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase in switchgrass leads to reduced lignin content and improved fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. New Phytol 192:611–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xu B, Sathitsuksanoh N, Tang Y, Udvardi MK, Zhang J-Y, Shen Z, Balota M, Harich K, Zhang PYH, Zhao B (2012) Overexpression of AtLOV1 in switchgrass alters plant architecture, lignin content, and flowering time. PLoS One 7:e47399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yau YY, Wang Y, Thomson JG, Ow DW (2011) Method for Bxb1-mediated site-specific integration in planta. Methods Mol Biol 701:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yoo SY, Kim Y, Kim SY, Lee JS, Ahn JH (2007) Control of flowering time and cold response by a NAC-domain protein in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 2:e642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yuan JS, Tiller KH, Al-Ahmad H, Stewart NR, Stewart CN (2008) Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future. Trends Plant Sci 13:421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang Y, Yu L, Yung KF, Leung DY, Sun F, Lim BL (2012) Over-expression of AtPAP2 in Camelina sativa leads to faster plant growth and higher seed yield. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhao X, Zhang L, Liu D (2012) Biomass recalcitrance. Part I: the chemical compositions and physical structures affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 6:465–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of AgricultureTottori UniversityTottoriJapan
  2. 2.Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute Forest Bio-Research CenterHitachiJapan

Personalised recommendations