Abstract
Through the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and the Interim Constitution of 2007, Nepal has vowed to address the conflict-era human rights violations including through adopting a credible transitional justice processes. However, the national commitments towards ensuring accountability for past human rights violations and ensuring non-repetition of such violations in future are yet to be fulfilled. In this context, the judicial activism appears to have been a silver lining in terms of taking forward the transitional justice issues. In this backdrop, this chapter aims to analyse the decisions of Supreme Court of Nepal pertaining to promoting accountability for the past human rights violations and to examine the strengths and weaknesses of judicial response in the light of victims’ right to effective remedy guaranteed under the international human rights treaties and jurisprudence. This chapter finally provides a set of suggestions towards strengthening the transitional justice process in Nepal.
References
Bowcott O (2015) Nepalese Colonel Faces Torture Trial in UK, The Guardian. Available at http://goo.gl/Z5MkTv, (27 February 2015)
Chapagai RP (2009) National application of international human rights law: a Nepali perspective, NJA (National Judicial Academy). Law J vol 3, Kathmandu
Chapagai RP (2014) Review of the legislative framework and jurisprudence concerning the right to adequate food. Office of the Food and Agriculture of the United Nations, Rome. http://goo.gl/L9j22F
Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 2015 (1959 AD) was promulgated. http://goo.gl/uRYfqt
Hachhethu K (1990) Transition to democracy in Nepal negotiations behind constitution making. http://goo.gl/nmuQ8q
Law Reporter, Nepal 2065 (2008 AD) No. 9, p 1108
NJA (2016) A Study on Implementation Status of the Supreme Court and Appellate Court Decisions and Orders concerning Impunity, Transitional Justice and Accountability, documents 18 Appellate Court Orders requiring the authorities to file FIR or proceed criminal investigation as provided under the State Cases Act and the Regulation
OHCHR, Nepal Conflict Report (2012), pp 112, 117, 152, 180
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2012) Nepal Conflict Report, pp 36–39. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/NP/OHCHR_Nepal_Conflict_Report2012.pdf
OHCHR-Nepal (2011) Legal Opinion, ‘The relationship between Transitional Justice mechanisms and the Criminal Justice system Can conflict-related human rights and humanitarian law violations and abuses be deferred or suspended on the basis of commitments to establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission?’, pp 1–3. Available at http://goo.gl/E2YUPb
OHCHR-Nepal’s Legal Opinion on Remedies and Rights Revoked: Case withdrawal for serious crimes in Nepal, 2011. http://goo.gl/33hxhn
Petition, Writ (2002) No 2942 of the year 2059, decision dated 9 January 2004
Petition, Writ (2004) No 3393 of 2061(BS), decision dated 11 July 2008
Petition, Writ (2005a) No 3219 of the year 2062, decision dated 17 December 2007
Petition, Writ (2005b) No 3394 of the Year 2061, decision dated 10 February 2006
Petition, Writ (2006a) No 3348 of the Year 2063, decision dated 12 May 2008
Petition, Writ (2006b) No 3348 of the Year 2063, decision dated 12 May 2008
Petition, Writ (2007a) No 0863 of the year 2064, decision dated 7 December 2008
Petition, Writ (2007b) No 434 of the Year 2007, decision dated 18 September 2008
Petition, Writ (2009) No 1333 of the Year 2066, decision dated 2069-01-05
Petition, Writ (2010) No 067-wo-1198 of the year 2067, decision dated 13 August 2010
Petition, Writ (2012a) No 0057 of the year 2069 (BS), decision dated 2070-9-18(BS)
Petition, Writ (2012b) No 0057 of the year 2069(BS), decision dated 2 January 2014
Petition, Writ (2012c) No 069-WS-0057 & of the Year 2069(BS), decision dated decision dated 2 January 2014
Petition, Writ (2012d) No 069-WS-0058 & of the Year 2069(BS), decision dated 2 January 2014
Petition, Writ (2013a) No 0050 of the year 2070(BS), decision dated 26 February 2015
Petition, Writ (2013b) No 711 of the Year 2070 (B.S.), decision dated 10 June 2015
Petition, Writ (2013c) No 0050 of the year 2070(BS), decision dated 26 February 2015 Report, Interim (2015), Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Petition, Writ (2014) No 0057 of the year 2069(BS), decision dated 2 January 2014
Petition, Writ (2015) No 0050 of the year 2070(BS), decision dated 26 February 2015
Report (2013) Expert Task Force mandated to draft bills concerning Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Commission on Inquiry into Disappeared People submitted to the Ministry of Peace Reconstruction, dated 2070-12-20 (BS)
Submissions to the Parliament by Justice and Rights Institute (JuRI-Nepal) and Informal Sector Service Center (INSEC), April 2016
Supreme Court (1994) Government of Nepal v Dil Bahadur Lama and others, NKP 2051, vol 7, p 504; Criminal Appeal No. 4940 of the year 2051(BS), 18 August 1994
Supreme Court (2007a) Government of Nepal v Devendra Mandal and others, Criminal Appeal No. 0197 of the year 2064(BS), 3 September 2007
Supreme Court (2007b) Rabindra Prasad Dhakal and Advocate Rajendra Prasad Dhakal and Ors v Nepal and Ors, Decision on Petition for Habeas Corpus and Mandamus, Nepal Law Review 49(2), Decision No. 7817P, 169, ILDC 756 (NP 2007)
Supreme Court (2007c) Rasaili v. Government of Nepal, Supreme Court of Nepal, order of December 14, 2009 in Writ No. 0339/2064 (2007)
Supreme Court (2009) Kedar Chaulagain v. Kavre District Police Office and District Attorney’s Office, Supreme Court of Nepal, Chief Justice Anupraj Sharma and Justice Ram Kumar Prasad Shah, Writ No. 064‐WO‐0339, 14 December 2009
Supreme Court (2011) Sushil Pyakurel and Others v. Prime Minister Jhalanath Khanal and Others, Writ No 1094 of the year 2068, decision dated 21 June 2011
Supreme Court (2014) Govinda Sharma Bandi v. Attorney General Mr. Mukti Pradhan, Office of the Attorney General, Writ petition no 04740 of the Year 2069, decision dated 2 April 2014
The Constitution of Nepal, 2019 (1962 AD)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chapagai, R.P., Karn, P.K. (2018). Accountability for Conflict-Era Human Rights Violations in Nepal: An Appraisal of Strategic Human Rights Litigation. In: Kaul, J., Jha, A. (eds) Shifting Horizons of Public International Law. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3724-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3724-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3722-8
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3724-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)