Skip to main content

Economic Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Goods and Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The degradation of wetland resources including waterbodies, marshy coastal cropland, mangroves and salt marshes due to a variety of human activities within and outside the wetlands is a major environmental concern in India. Despite their importance, these ecosystems are under severe threat of degradation due to both natural and anthropogenic factors primarily due to the lack of awareness of the link between human support systems and natural ecosystems. Unless our natural capital is systematically accounted for, coupled with the knowledge of its total economic value, the probability of unsustainable exploitation leading to loss of human well-being would be significantly high. This necessitates a thorough understanding on the tools and techniques used in economic valuation and the ecosystem goods and services of a wetland ecosystem. The present chapter provides comprehensive information on the typology of various tools used in economic valuation of wetland resources. A synthesis of available information from published literature is also included, which provides a snapshot of monetary values of this natural resource.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ecological succession: Many ecosystems experience a phenomenon known as ecological succession, a slow process in which the species inhabiting an ecosystem fluctuate or change completely. Some species increase in population, while others decrease or even disappear altogether. These shifts can be due to new species entering the ecosystem, current species impacting the ecosystem, or evolutionary changes within a certain species allowing them to better adapt to the ecosystem.

References

  • Bann C (1999) A contingent valuation of the mangroves of Benut, Johor State, Malaysia. Johor State Forestry Department/DANCED/Darudec, Johor

    Google Scholar 

  • Bann C (2003) An economic analysis of alternative mangrove management strategies in Koh Kong Province, Cambodia, Penang

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2007) Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ Policy 22(49):178–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi N, Kumar MD, Sharma A, Pardha-Saradhi P (2014) Status of wetlands in India: a review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 2:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham G, Bishop R, Brody M, Bromley D, Clark E, Cooper W, Costanza R, Hale T, Hayden G, Kellert S, Norgaard R, Norton B, Payne J, Russell C, Suter G (1995) Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making. Ecol Econ 14:73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birol E, Cox V (2007) Using choice experiments to design wetland management programmes: the case of Severn Estuary Wetland, UK. J Environ Plan Manag 50(3):363–380. doi:10.1080/09640560701261661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhnke-Henrichs A, Baulcomb C, Koss R, Hussain SS, de Groot RS (2013) Typology and indicators of ecosystem services for marine spatial planning and management. J Environ Manag 130:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braat LC, de Groot R (2012) The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesura A, de Groot R (2003) Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ 44(2–3):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua T, Nancy B (1999) Challenges and opportunities in managing pollution in the East Asian seas: proceedings of the International Conference, Metro Manila, Philippines, 22–24 March 1999. GEF, Quezon City

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosier P (2011) Accounting for the condition of environmental assets, Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists, UN Committee of Experts on Environmental Accounting Technical Meeting on Ecosystem Accounts, London, no. December (2011), pp 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Suttonkk P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D, Woodwell GM (1997) Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues Ecol 2:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S (2011) Examining the storm protection services of mangroves of Orissa during the 1999 cyclone. Econ Polit Wkly 46(24):60–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Vincent JR (2009) Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cyclone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:7357–7360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DebRoy P, Jayaraman R (2012) Economic valuation of mangroves for assessing the livelihood of fisherfolk: a case study in India. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, Dares Salaam, Tanzania 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2011) An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Crown Copyright, London, pp 8–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit AM, Kumar P, Kumar L, Pathak KD, Patel MI (2010) Economic valuation of coral reef systems in Gulf of Kachchh. Final Report. World Bank aided Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Project. Submitted to Gujarat Ecology Commission, Gandhinagar, India, p 158

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerton L, Kekulandala LDCB (2003) Assessment of the economic value of Muthurajawela Wetland. Occ. Pap. IUCN, Sri Lanka., p 4:iv + 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Bateman I, Turner RK (2011) Valuing ecosystem services: benefits, values, space and time. In: Kumar P, Thiaw I (eds) Values, payments and institutions for ecosystem management. Edward Elgar, London, pp 58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, Su C, Wei Y (2011) Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecol Res 26(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirway I, Goswami S (2007) Valuation of coastland resources: the case of mangroves in Gujarat. Academic Foundation, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Zhang M, Huang X (2014) Research on the ecological conflict between coastal wetland and port construction – A case study of the Meizhou Gulf. Low Carbon Econ 5:57–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/lce.2014.52007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain SA, Badola R (2010) Valuing mangrove benefits: contribution of mangrove forests to local livelihoods in Bhitarkanika Conservation Area, east coast of India. Wetl Ecol Manag 18(3):321–331. doi:10.1007/s11273-009-9173-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G, Snapp R, Villa F, Bagstad K (2012) Modelling ecosystem service flows under uncertainty with stochastic SPAN. http://www.iemss.org/sites/iemss2012//proceedings/D1_2_0900_Johnson_et_al.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2015

  • Kaladharan P, Veena S, Vivekanandan E (2009) Carbon sequestration by a few marine algae: observation and projection. J Mar Biol Assoc India 51(1):107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan J, Greene P (2013) Selecting discount rates for natural capital accounting. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http:/www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/get-involved/events/events/valuation-for-natural-capital-accounting-seminar/index.html. Accessed 11 Mar 2015

  • Landry CE, Hindsley P (2011) Valuing beach quality with hedonic property models. Land Econ 87(1):92–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Quesne T, McNally R (2005) The green buck: using economic tools to deliver conservation goals. A WWF field guide. https://www.cbd.int/doc/books/2005/B-02617.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2015.

  • McAllister DE (1991) What is a coral reef worth? Sea Wind 5(1):21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol Econ 35(200):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoEF (2006) National environment policy. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, pp 33–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee V, Gupta G (2013) Toxicity and profitability of rice cultivation under wastewater irrigation: the case of the East Calcutta wetlands. Ecol Econ 93:292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcome J, Provins A, Johns H, Ozdemiroglu E, Ghazoul J, Burgess D, Turner K (2005) The economic, social and ecological value of ecosystem services. https://www.cbd.int/financial/values/unitedkingdom-valueliterature.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2015

  • Nordhaus W (2011) Estimates of the social cost of carbon: background and results from the RICE-2011 model. National Bureau of Economic Research, p 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla J (2009) Analysis of coastal and marine resources: a contribution to the Philippines country environmental analysis. World Bank, p 158

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons GR, Massey DM, Tomasi T (2000) Familiar and favorite sites in a random utility model of beach recreation. Mar Resour Econ 14:299–315. doi:10.2307/42629275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad SN, Ramachandra TV, Ahalya N, Sengupta T, Kumar A, Tiwari AK, Vijayan VS, Vijayan L (2002) Conservation of wetlands – a review. Trop Ecol 43:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Provins A (2013) Accounting for the value of wetland services. Paper presented at the seminar on the valuation for natural capital accounting, Office of National Statistics London, 13 December 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasul G, Chettri N, Sharma E (2011) Framework for valuing ecosystem services in the Himalayas. http://lib.icimod.org/record/8115/files/attachment_745.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2015

  • Ray R, Ganguly D, Chowdhury C, Dey M, Das S, Dutta MK, Mandal SK, Majumder N, De TK, Mukhopadhyay SK, Jana TK (2011) Carbon sequestration and annual increase of carbon stock in a mangrove forest. Atmos Environ 45(28):5016–5024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raybould M, Lazarow N, Anning D, Ware D, Blackwell B (2011). A travel cost model of local resident’s beach recreation values on the Gold Coast. Paper presented at the 20th NSW Coastal Conference, Coffs Harbour City Council, Coffs Harbour 8–11 November 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnbäck P (1999) The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems. Ecol Econ 29:235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger RS, Loomis JB (2003) Benefit transfer. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A primer on non-market valuation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 445–482

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sathirathai S, Barbier E (2001) Valuing mangrove conservation in Southern Thailand. Contemp Econ Policy 19:109–122. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7287.2001.tb00054.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroter M, van der Zanden EH, van Oudenhoven APE, Remme RP, Serna-Chavez HM, de Groot RS, Opdam P (2014) Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv Lett 7(6):514–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, de Groot D, Perrot-Maîte D, Bergkamp G (2006) Pay – establishing payments for watershed services. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Reprint, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Spash CL, Vatn A (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecol Econ 60(2):379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2006) Marine and coastal ecosystems and human wellbeing: a synthesis report based on the findings of the millennium ecosystem assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, p 76

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman K (2007) Coastal and marine wetlands in India. http://www.moef.nic.in/sites/default/files/nlcp/C-%20Biodiversity/C-2.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2015

  • Verma M, Negandhi D, Wahal AK, Kumar R (2013) Revision of rates of NPV applicable for different class/category of forest. http://envfor.nic.in/sites/default/files/report.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2015

  • Waite R, Burke L, Gray E (2014) Coastal capital ecosystem valuation for decision making in the Caribbean. http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/coastal_capital_ecosystem_valuation_caribbean_guidebook_online.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2015

  • Wegner G, Pascual U (2011) Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: a multidisciplinary critique. Glob Environ Chang 21:492–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White A, Ross M, Flores M (2000) Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs. In: Cesar H (ed) Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs. CORDIO, Department for Biology and Environmental Sciences, Kalmar University, Sweden, pp 215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2010) www.worldwildlife.org/press-releases/climate-change-threatens-to-wipe-out-one-of-world-s-largest-tiger-populations-this-century (2010). World Wildlife Fund

  • www.keralatourism.org (2013) Kerala Tourist Statistics – 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • www.seagrasswatch.org (2013) India seagrass

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Kreuter U, Li B, Ma Z, Chen J, Nakagoshi N (2004) An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy 21:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priya Narayanan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix A.14.1: Valuation Methodologies within TEV Framework

Valuation technique

Applicability to Indian wetland ecosystems

Examples of wetland ecosystem application

Limitations

Revealed preference techniques

Hedonic pricing method (HPM): The value of an environmental amenity (such as a view) is obtained from readily available property or labour markets. The basic assumption is that the observed property value (or wage) reflects a stream of benefits (or working conditions) and that it is possible to isolate the value of the relevant environmental amenity or attribute

Hedonic pricing has potential for valuing certain wetland functions (e.g. aesthetic beauty, landscapes and open spaces from sandy beaches) in terms of their impact on land values, assuming that they are fully reflected in land prices

Landry and Hindsley (2011) conducted a study to explore the influence of beach quality on coastal property values. It was estimated that property values within 300 m of HTL are positively impacted by the width of the beach and dune field

Application of this approach to value wetland services requires these values to be reflected in proxy markets. The approach may be limited by unstable real estate markets, choices constrained by income and unequal distribution of information about environmental conditions

Travel cost approach (TC): The travel cost approach derives willingness to pay for environmental benefits at a specific location by using information on the amount of money and time that people spend to visit the location

Widely used to estimate the value of recreational, religious and cultural sites in coastal and wetland areas. It could also be used to estimate willingness to pay for ecotourism

Raybould et al. (2011) estimated the value of recreational benefits (AU$365 million to AU$1.7 billion) to Gold Coast residents depending on their travel costs including time and fuel costs

The approach is data intensive; it is restrictive on the assumptions about consumer behaviour (e.g. multifunctional trips); its results are highly sensitive to statistical methods used to specify the demand relationship

Random utility method (RUM): This is an extension of the travel cost method and is used to test the effect of changing the quality or quantity of an environmental characteristic at a particular site

The travel cost RUM analyses a person’s discrete choice of one recreation site over other sites. The site choice is assumed to depend on the features of the site and to reveal the person’s preferences for those features

Parsons et al. (2000) estimated a (TC) random utility model of recreation demand. The model evaluates the loss in mean welfare value per trip per person if select beaches were too close to its residents

The random utility model is an extremely complicated and expensive (in terms of man-hours required) approach to value ecosystem service benefits

Stated preference techniques

Contingent valuation method (CVM): constructs a hypothetical market to elicit respondents’ willingness to pay for a particular environmental service. It can be used to estimate use and more importantly non-use values

It is the only method that can measure existence values and provide a true measure of total economic value. Most regulating and cultural services of wetland ecosystems are estimated using CVM. E.g. protection from extreme weather events by estuaries and recreational benefits from coral reefs

Bann (1999) estimated the willingness to pay values (US$7512/Ha) of protecting mangroves for its nursery and biodiversity services in Malaysia

The results of this approach are sensitive to numerous sources of bias in survey design and implementation

Choice experiments: estimate implicit values of different use and non-use environmental services. Since it is based on the trade-off between options with different specified characteristics, it is best suited to better-informed policy decisions

CE method, just like the CVM, attempts to measure all use and non-use values including biodiversity and cultural values of wetland ecosystems

Birol and Cox (2007) used the choice experiment approach to investigate whether the communities living around the Severn wetland derived positive economic values if the wetlands were sustainably managed

Some of the critical issues for choice experiments are the technical and behavioural uncertainties in monetizing the actual value of responses taken on a particular good or service. It may cause biases in responses or decision-making

Market-based techniques

Production function approach (PFA): estimates the value of a non-marketed resource or ecological function in terms of changes in economic activity by modelling the physical contribution of the resource or function to economic output

Widely used to estimate the impact of wetlands and reef destruction, deforestation, water pollution, etc. on productive activities such as fishing, hunting and farming

The study utilized the production function method to value the mangrove forests to a local community. The method was particularly used for the value of fisheries (~US$50) supported by local mangroves in the Gulf of Thailand region (Sathirathai and Barbier 2001)

Requires explicit modelling of the ‘dose-response’ relationship between the resources and some economic output. Application of the approach is most straightforward in the case of single-use systems but becomes more complicated with multiple-use systems. Problems may arise from multi-specification of the ecological-economic relationship or double counting

Replacement cost (RPC): this method uses cost of artificial substitutes for environmental goods or services

RPC: useful in estimating indirect use benefits when ecological data are not available for estimating damage functions with first-best methods

McAllister (1991) estimated the value of coastal protection provided by the coral reefs in the Philippines using the replacement cost method. The study estimated US$22 billion, based on construction costs of concrete tetrapod breakwaters to replace 22,000 km2 of reef protection

RPC: difficult to ensure that net benefits of the replacement do not exceed those of the original function. May overstate willingness to pay if only physical indicators of benefits are available

Market prices (MP): are those that capture the value of goods and services that are traded in the open market. Market prices can act as proxies for direct and indirect use values

Market prices reflect the private willingness to pay for several use values. For example, the value of fish nurseries provided by mangroves is measured by the market price of all fish harvested from that area

Emerton and Kekulandala (2003) used market price to value the economic benefits associated with fishing, agriculture and handicraft production activities in Muthurajawela wetland. The market value of firewood obtained from Muthurajawela was INR 7.96 million/year

Market imperfections and/or policy failures may distort market prices, which will therefore fail to reflect the economic value of goods or services to society as a whole. Seasonal variations and other effects on prices need to be considered when market prices are used in economic analysis

Benefit transfer

Benefit transfer (Rosenberger and Loomis 2003): the process by which the economic value of an environmental good or service generated in one context – the ‘study site’ – is applied to another context known as benefit transfer or value transfer. In principle, a value from any economic valuation methodology may be used as long as the contexts of both sites are the same

This technique is used when primary valuation studies are not feasible in terms of timelines and budgets. Also policy and conservation schemes predominantly use macro-level monetary estimates, and benefit transfer offers an effective solution to include environmental values to the appraisal process

Gujarat Ecology Commission (Dixit et al. 2010) estimated the values of coastal protection (INR 2.89 million/km2/year) and biodiversity maintenance (INR 0.32 million/ km2/year) of coral systems in the Gulf of Kachchh region in India using benefit transfer methodology

One of the critical issues with the use of benefit transfer is the validity and accuracy of secondary data

1.2 Appendix A.14.2: Online Databases on Valuation

Institute

Particulars

Marine Ecosystem Services Partnership (MESP)

MESP is a virtual centre for information and communication on the human uses of marine ecosystems around the world, including an extensive database of marine and coastal valuation studies with nearly 2000 value estimates

Harte Research Institute – Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi

The two main goals of the GecoServ database are to allow for the distribution and sharing of information about ES valuation studies and to identify current gaps in the ES literature. The studies summarized here are for habitats that are relevant to the Gulf of Mexico region even though they may have been conducted elsewhere

National Ocean Economics Program (NOEP)

NOEP provides economic and socio-economic information on changes and trends along the US coast and will soon expand its scope internationally. NOEP includes databases on market and non-market values of coastal and marine resources

Environmental Valuation Reference Inventory (EVRI)

EVRI is a searchable storehouse of more than 2000 empirical studies on the economic value of environmental benefits and human health effects. It has been developed as a tool to help policy analysts use the benefit transfer approach

The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)

Ecosystem Service Valuation Database (ESVD), initially developed for TEEB initiative, contains more than 1300 data points from more than 300 case studies on both marine and terrestrial ecosystem services

Lincoln University, New Zealand

This database provides users with a large (850+) bibliography of valuation studies. The economic value of many of these studies is also analysed and reported. These values have been standardized temporally and spatially so the application of the values is adequately robust

Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics

The Valuation Study Database for Environmental Change in Sweden (ValueBaseSWE) was developed at the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics within a project funded by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. The database is the result of a survey of empirical economic valuation studies on environmental change in Sweden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pasupalati, N. et al. (2017). Economic Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Goods and Services. In: Prusty, B., Chandra, R., Azeez, P. (eds) Wetland Science . Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3715-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics