Advertisement

Acquisition, Tracking, and Pointing

  • Hemani Kaushal
  • V. K. Jain
  • Subrat Kar
Chapter
Part of the Optical Networks book series (OPNW)

Abstract

For ground-to-satellite laser communication link, it is essential to establish line-of-sight (LOS) path between ground-based station and the onboard satellite to ensure reliability of the system. Since the optical beam is very narrow, it requires a very accurate acquisition, tracking, and pointing (ATP) subsystems especially for long-distance communication. The process of aligning the transmitter in the field of view (FOV) of receiver is called “pointing,” and the process of aligning the receiver in the arrival direction of the beam is called “spatial acquisition.” It is a process defined by the ability of the receiver to search within initial uncertainty region for detecting the optical beam from the transmitter. Maintaining both “pointing” and “acquisition” throughout the communication time period is referred as “spatial tracking.” For FSO communication system, it is desirable to have an efficient performance of acquisition system within shortest acquisition time. Very fast and precise pointing and tracking system with good accuracy has to be incorporated into the system to maintain the LOS between transmitter and receiver. One of the major sources of pointing errors also called “boresight errors” arises due to stress, noise, structure fabrication, etc., of various electronic and mechanical components in the satellite. The pointing error is further increased due to turbulence-induced beam wander (discussed in Chap.  2) which may deviate the optical beam from its LOS. Further, the vibration of satellite platform and ATP assembly may complicate the pointing process and results in random pointing jitter. This will lead to significant displacement of transmitted beam at the receiver which will increase pointing error and cause significant degradation of the system performance. This chapter begins with the description of acquisition link in Sect. 4.1. It covers mathematical modeling, beam divergence, and power criteria required to establish the acquisition link. Details of tracking and pointing errors are given in Sect. 4.2. In Sect. 4.3, the concept and importance of ATP system is highlighted. Finally, ATP link budget is discussed in Sect. 4.4.

Keywords

Beam Divergence Beacon Signal Beat Noise Dichroic Beam Splitter Uncertainty Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    A.A. Portillo, G.G. Ortiz, C. Racho, Fine pointing control for free-space optical communication, in Proceeding of IEEE Conference on Aerospace, Piscataway, vol. 3, 2001, pp. 1541–1550Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Giggenbach, Lasercomm activities at the German aerospace center’s institute of communications and navigation, in International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications, Corsica (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Katzman, Laser Satellite Communications (Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.J. Davis, R.B. Deadrick, J.R. Stahlman, ALGS: design and testing of an earth-to-satellite optical transceiver. Proc. SPIE-Free-Sp. Laser Commun. Technol.-V 1866 (107), 107 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Bloom, E. Korevaar, J. Schuster, H. Willebrand, Understanding the performance of free-space optics. J. Opt. Netw 2 (6), 178–200 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Toyoshima, T. Jono, K. Nakagawa, A. Yamamoto, Optimum divergence angle of a Gaussian beam wave in the presence of random jitter in free-space laser communication systems. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 19, 567–571 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Xin, Y. Siyuan, M. Jing, T. Liying, Analytical expression and optimization of spatial acquisition for intersatellite optical communications. Opt. Exp. 19 (3), 2381–2390 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.G. Lambert, W.L. Casey, Laser Communications in Space (Artech House Inc., Norwood, 1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Flom, Spaceborne laser radar. Appl. Opt. 11 (2), 291–299 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I.M. Teplyakov, Acquisition and tracking of laser beams in space communications. Acta Astronaut. 7 (3), 341–355 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.M. Lopez, K.Yong, Acquisition, tracking, and fine pointing control of space-based laser communication systems. Proceedings of SPIE-Control and Communication Technology in Laser Systems, Bellingham, vol. 26, 1981, pp. 100–114Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.G. Zambrana, B.C. Vazquez, C.C. Vazquez, Asymptotic error-rate analysis of FSO links using transmit laser selection over gamma-gamma atmospheric turbulence channels with pointing errors. J. Opt. Exp. 20 (3), 2096–2109 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D.K. Borah, D.G. Voelz, Pointing error effects on free-space optical communication links in the presence of atmospheric turbulence. J. Lightwave Technol. 27 (18), 3965–3973 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Hemmati, Near-Earth Laser Communications (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hemani Kaushal
    • 1
  • V. K. Jain
    • 2
  • Subrat Kar
    • 2
  1. 1.Electronics and CommunicationThe NorthCap UniversityGurgaonIndia
  2. 2.Electrical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations