Abstract
Chromosome identification has been traditionally based on morphological features of individual chromosomes such as chromosome length, arm ratio and primary and secondary constriction collectively called as karyotype. A number of stains such as acetocarmine, Feulgen and aceto-orcein all of them being whole chromosome stains have been used in these studies. Although classical staining helps in studying chromosome morphology, structural and numerical variations, however, morphologically similar chromosomes cannot be distinguished. The utilization of fluorescent and other dyes together with various modifications in pretreatment of cytological material in the late 1960s led to the discovery of various banding techniques which proved to be additional tool for identification of individual chromosomes. New and reliable staining procedures were introduced; each was capable of revealing a unique banding pattern of the chromosomes of a given species. The advantage with banding techniques is that they can resolve morphologically similar as well as different chromosomes and help in understanding the chromosome organization. Chromosome banding is a lengthwise variation in staining properties along a chromosome based on the GC- or AT-rich regions or constitutive heterochromatin. A single dye or fluorochrome can often be used to produce a banding pattern on a chromosome. A band is a part of chromosome which is clearly distinguishable from its adjacent segment by appearing darker or lighter with various banding methods. The Paris Conference – 1971 – classified banding techniques as Q–banding (fluorescence based), C–banding (constitutive heterochromatin (AT- or GC-rich DNA)), G–banding (whole length banding (Giemsa staining)), R–banding (reverse of G–banding) and Ag-NOR stain (nucleolar organizing regions). All these banding techniques have led to a more precise cytogenetic and phylogenetic analysis of various eukaryotes. The major applications of banding techniques have been the mapping of genes on chromosomes and identification of chromosome alterations such as deletions, duplications, translocations and aneuploidy. They have also played an important role in measuring the amount of heterochromatin among individuals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson LK, Stack SM, Mitchell JB (1982) An investigation of the basis of current hypothesis for lack of G-banding in plant chromosomes. Exp Celt Res 138:433–436
Arrighi FE, Hsu TC (1971) Location of heterochromatin in human chromosomes. Cytogenetics 10:81–86
Barch MJ, Lawce HJ, Arsham MS (1991) Peripheral blood culture. In: Barch MJ (ed) The ACT cytogenetics laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Raven, New York, pp 17–30
Barton DW (1950) Pachytene morphology of the tomato chromosome complement. Am J Bot 37:639–643
Bobrow M, Madan K, Pearson PL (1972) Staining of some specific regions of human chromosomes, particularly the secondary constriction of no. 9. Nat New Biol 238:122–124
Brutlag D, Appels R, Dennis EG (1977) Highly repeated DNA and Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Biol 112:31–47
Burkholder GD, Weaver MG (1977) DNA-protein interactions and chromosome banding. Exp Cell Res 110(2):251–262
Caspersson T, Farber S, Foley GE, Kudynowski J, Modest EJ, Simonsson E, Wagh U, Zech L (1968) Chemical differentiation along metaphase chromosomes. Exp Cell Res 49:219–223
Caspersson T, Zech L, Modest EJ, Foley GE, Wagh U, Simonsson E (1969) DNA-binding fluorochromes for the study of the organization of the metaphase nucleus. Exp Cell Res 58:141–152
Caspersson T, Zech L, Johansson C (1970) Analysis of human metaphase chromosome set by aid of DNA-binding fluorescent agents. Exp Cell Res 62:490–492
Comings DE (1975) Mechanisms of chromosome banding. IV. Optical properties of the Giemsa dyes. Chromosoma 50:89–110
Comings DE, Kovacs BW, Avelino E, Harris DC (1975) Mechanism of chromosome banding. V. Quinacrine banding. Chromosoma 50:111–145
Corneo G, Ginelli E, Polli E (1970) Repeated sequences in human DNA. J Mol Biol 48:319–327
Creighton HB, McClintock B (1931) A correlation of cytological and genetical crossing-over in Zea mays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 17:492–497
Darlington CD, La Cour LF (1940) Nucleic acid starvation of chromosomes in Trillium. J Genet 40:185–213
Deumling B, Greilhuber J (1982) Characterization of heterochromatin in different species of the Scilla Siberia group (Liliaceae) by in situ hybridization of satellite DNA and fluorochrome banding. Chromosoma 84:535–555
Drewry A (1982) G-banded chromosomes in Pinus resinosa. J Hered 73:305–306
Dutrillaux B, Lejeune J (1971) Sur une nouvelle technique d’analyse du caryotype humain. CR Acad Sci Paris 272:2638–2640
Dutrillaux B, Lejeune J (1975) New techniques in the study of human chromosomes; methods and applications. Adv Hum Genet 5:119–156
Endo TR, Gill BS (1984) The heterochromatin distribution and genome evolution in diploid species of Elymus and Agropyron. Can J Genet Cytol 26:669–678
Faust J, Vogel W (1974) Are N-bands selective staining of specific heterochromatin? Nature 249:352–353
Filion WG, Blakey DH (1979) Differential Giemsa staining in plants VI. Centromeric banding. Can J Genet Cytol 21:373–378
Flavell RB, O’Dell M (1976) Ribosomal RNA genes on homoeologous chromosomes of group 5 and 6 in hexaploid wheat. Heredity 37(3):377–385
Friebe B, Gill BS (1994) C-band polymorphism and structural rearrangements detected in common wheat (Triticum aestivum). Euphytica 78:1–5
Funaki K, Matsui S, Sasaki M (1975) Localization of nucleolar organizers in animal and plant chromosomes by means of an improved N-banding technique. Chromosoma 49:357–370
Gerlach WL (1977) N-banded karyotypes of wheat species. Chromosoma 62:49–56
Gill BS, Friebe B, Endo TR (1991) Standard karyotype and nomenclature system for description of chromosome bands and structural aberrations in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Genome 34(5):830–839
Greilhuber J (1977) Why plant chromosomes do not show G-bands. Theor Appl Genet 50:121–124
Henderson SA, Warburton D, Atwood KC (1974) Localization of rDNA in the chromosome complement of Rhesus (Macaca mulatta). Chromosoma 44:367–370
Holmquist G, Gray M, Poster T, Jordan J (1982) Characterization of Giemsa dark and light banded DNA. Cell 31:121–129
Horobin RW (2011) How Romanowsky stains work and why they remain valuable – including a proposed universal Romanowsky staining mechanism and a rational troubleshooting scheme. Biotech Histochem 86(1):36–51
Howell WM (1985) Selective staining of nucleolus organizer regions (NORs). In: Busch H, Rothblum L (eds) The cell nucleus vol. XI. rDNA part B. Academic Press Inc, New York, pp 89–142
Howell WM, Denton TE, Diamond JR (1975) Differential staining of the satellite regions of human acrocentric chromosomes. Experentia 31:260–262
Hutchinson J, Miller TE (1982) The nucleolus organizers of tetraploid and hexaploid wheats revealed by in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet 61:285–288
Jewell DC (1979) Chromosome banding of Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese spring and aegilops variables. Chromosoma 71:129–134
Jones KW (1970) Chromosomal and nuclear location of mouse satellite DNA in individual cells. Nature 225:912–915
Kit S (1961) Equilibrium sedimentation in density gradients of DNA preparations from animals tissues. J Mol Biol 3:711–716
Kongsuwan K, Smyth DR (1977) Q-band in Lilium and their relationship to C banded heterochromatin. Chromosoma 60:169–178
Lin CC, Jorgenson KF, van de Sande JH (1980) Specific fluorescent bands on chromosomes produced by acridine orange after prestaining with base specific non-fluorescent DNA ligands. Chromosoma 79: 271–276
Liu JY (2006) Detection of human chromosomal abnormalities using a new technique combining 4',6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole staining and image analysis. Clin Genet 69(1):65–71
Loidl J (1983) Some features of heterochromatin of wild Allium species. Plant Syst Evol 143:117–131
Magoon ML, Shambulinguppa KG (1961) Karyomorphology of Sorghum propinquum and its bearing on origin of 40- chromosome sorghum. Chromosoma 12:460–465
Matsui S, Sasaki M (1973) Differential staining of nucleolus organizers in mammalian chromosomes. Nature 246:148–150
McClintock B (1929) Chromosome morphology in Zea mays. Science 69:629
McClintock B (1932) The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea mays. Genetics 26:234–282
McClintock B (1938) The production of homozygous deficient tissues with mutant characteristics by means of the aberrant mitotic behavior of ring-shaped chromosomes. Genetics 23:315–376
McClintock B (1941) The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea mays. Genetics 26:234–282
McClintock B (1984) The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226:792–801
McKenzie WH, Lubs HA (1973) An analysis of the technical variables in the production of C-bands. Chromosoma 41:175–182
Michelson AM, Monny C, Kovoor A (1972) Action of quinacrine mustard on polynucleotide. Biochimie 54:1129–1136
Miller DA, Dev VG, Tantravahi R, Miller DJ (1976) Suppression of human nucleolus organizer activity in mouse human somatic hybrid cells. Exp Cell Res 101:235–243
Misra RN, Shastry SVS (1967) Pachytene analysis in Oryza. VIII. Chromosome morphology and karyotypic variation in O. sativa. Indian J Genet & Plant Breed 27:349–368
Pardue ML, Gall JG (1970) Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science 108:1356–1358
Phillips RL, Kleese RA, Wang SS (1971) The nucleolus organizer region of maize (Zea mays L.): chromosome site of DNA complementary to ribosomal RNA. Chromosoma 36:79–88
Pimpinelli S, Sanuni G, Gatti M (1976) Characterization of Drosophila heterochromatin. II. C-and N-banding. Chromosoma 57:377–386
Pinkel D, Straumem T, Gray JW (1986) Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:2934–2938
Ramanna MS, Parkken P (1967) Structure of and homology between pachytene and somatic metaphase chromosomes of tomato. Genetica 38:115–133
Ritossa FM, Spiegelman S (1965) Localization of DNA complementary to ribosomal RNA in the nucleolus organizer region of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 53:737–745
Rooney DE (2001) Human cytogenetics: constitutional analysis. Oxford University Press, New York
Rowland RE (1981) Chromosome banding and heterochromatin in Vicia faba. Theor Appl Genet 60:275–280
Schlegel R, Gill BS (1984) N-banding analysis of rye chromosomes and the relationship between N-banded and C-banded heterochromatin. Can J Genet Cytol 26:765–769
Schmid M, Guttenback M (1988) Evolutionary diversity of reverse (R) fluorescent chromosome bands in vertebrates. Chromosoma 97:101–114
Schweizer D (1976) Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58:307–324
Schweizer D (1979) Fluorescent chromosome banding in plants: applications, mechanisms, and implications for chromosome structure. In: Davies DR, Hopwood DA (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth John Innes Symposium. Norwich, Crowe
Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971–972
Shastry SVS, RangaRao DR, Misra RN (1960) Pachytene analysis in Oryza. I. Chromosome morphology in Oryza sativa. Indian J Genet & Plant Breed 20:15–21
Southern EM (1970) Base sequence and evo1ution of guinea a-satellite DNA. Nature 227:794–798
Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304–306
Sumner AT (1982) The nature and mechanisms of chromosome-banding. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 6(1):59–87
Sumner AT, Evans HJ, Buckland RA (1971) New technique for distinguishing between human chromosomes. Nat New Biol 232:31–32
Utrillaux B, Lejeune J (1971) Cytogenetique humaine. Sur une nouvelle technique d’ analyse du caryotype humain. C R Acad Sci 272:2638–2640
Verma RS, Babu A (1989) Human chromosomes. Manual of basic techniques. Pergamon press, New York, p 240
Vosa GG, Marchi P (1972) Quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining in plants. Nat New Biol 237:191–192
Wallace H, Bimstie ML (1966) Ribosomal cistrons and the nucleolus organizer. Biochem Biophys Acta 144:295–310
Wang HC, Kao KN (1988) G-banding in plant chromosomes. Genome 30:48–51
Weisblum B, de Haseth PL (1972) Quinacrine, a chromosome stain specific for deoxyadenylate-deoxythymidylate rich regions in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 63:629–632
Weisblum B, Haenssler E (1974) Fluorometric properties of bibenzimidazole derivative hoechst 33258, a fluorescent-probe specific for AT concentration in chromosomal DNA. Chromosoma 3:255–260
Wittekind DH, Gehring T (1985) On the nature of Romanowsky-Giemsa staining and the Romanowsky-Giemsa effect. 1. Model experiments on the specificity of azure B-eosin Y stain as compared with other thiazine dye-eosin Y combinations. Histochem J 17(3):263–272
Zanker V (1981) Fundamentals of pigment-substrate relationships in histochemistry. Acta Histochem 3:151–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shabir, P.A., Wani, A.A., Nawchoo, I.A. (2017). Banding Techniques in Chromosome Analysis. In: Bhat, T., Wani, A. (eds) Chromosome Structure and Aberrations. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3673-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3673-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3671-9
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3673-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)