Advertisement

Financial Regulation and Independent Debt Management Office

  • K. Kanagasabapathy
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

In the pre-reform period till 1980s, debt management remained passive and was not market oriented. Ever since the onset of financial sector reforms, the proposal for separation of debt from monetary management, and setting up of an independent Debt Management Office (DMO) gained prominence. As part of new financial regulatory architecture, an independent DMO is one among the seven new institutions proposed by the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission in India. It has been viewed that as both debt and monetary management became market oriented, the potential conflict between the two has surfaced. When the RBI is entrusted with the responsibility of both debt and monetary management, its market interventions and even its interest rate policy can be clouded by debt management objectives. The fiscal–monetary nexus in that sense cannot be underestimated. Separation of debt management can help in resolving this conflict.

Keywords

Central Bank Central Government Public Debt Government Debt Government Security 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Australian Office of Financial Management (1999–2000), Annual reportGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernanke BS (2010) Central bank independence. Transparency and accountability, Board of governors, Federal reserve system, MayGoogle Scholar
  3. Calvo AG (1988) Servicing the public debt: the role of expectations. Am Econ Rev 78(4):647–661Google Scholar
  4. CLSA Emerging Markets (2002) Unravelling public finances gordian debt. Global Economics Research, Special ReportGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond DW, Dybvig PH (1983) Bank Runs. Deposit Insur Liquidity, J Polit Econ 91(3):401–19Google Scholar
  6. Dincer N, Eichengreen B (2013) Central bank transparency and independence: updates and new measures, Working Paper No. 2013–21, Bank of KoreaGoogle Scholar
  7. Government of India (2013a) Report of the financial sector legislative reforms commission vol. I analysis and recommendations. Ministry of Finance, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Government of India (2013b) Report of the financial sector legislative reforms commission vol. Ii draft law. Ministry of Finance, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Hajra K, Jain R, Gajbhiye D (2009) Determinants of surplus cash balances of states in India: a panel data analysis. Reserve Bank of India, Staff reportGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanagasabapathy K (2012) Independent debt management office: rationale, scope and structure, a discussion note submitted to working group on DMO, FSLRC (Mimeo) Saket, N (2009). Relevance and concerns, indiastat.com, Debt management officeGoogle Scholar
  11. Singh C (2005) Public debt in India: the need to separate debt from monetary management. Working Paper No. 240. Stanford centre for international developmentGoogle Scholar
  12. Singh C (2013) A separate debt management office, WP No. 425, Indian institute of management BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  13. United Kingdom Debt Management Office (2000) Secondary market for gilts consultation and responseGoogle Scholar
  14. United Kingdom Debt Management Office (2005) Executive agency framework documentGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EPW Research FoundationMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations