Abstract
Jacques Derrida in the book Echographies of Television invites us to train ourselves into the mechanics of televisuality. In case of reading a written text, we attempt often to be close to the originary intention of the text, thereby unconsciously trying to repeat the original. This kind of unconscious technicity, however, is much more foregrounded in the televisual where the spectator unknowingly remains haunted by the hidden modes of its construction. This paper through a reading of Jacques Derrida and Bernard Stiegler tries to show how and why this technicity has to be recognized and how it is unavoidable in the case of a televisualized object-image. The presentness is much more rooted in the televisual reproduction, though with the awareness that this must have been framed. I propose here that there is certain spectrality at the heart of the televisual that corresponds closely to the spectrality of the world order after the end of history and end of ideology epoch. The spectrality is insinuated to the perpetual presentness in terms of temporal and spatial omnipresence of an Empire around the globe which is all pervasive. In this context, the paper would talk about the enframing of man and notions of humanity—the human subject in terms of a new paradigm of power supplementing Foucault’s notion of biopower, which I would call information-power, which radically reorients the knowledge/power paradigm. It would also focus on a literary rethinking of the human–animal difference insinuated by the changing paradigm of power.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The notion of imagination here is borrowed from Gayatri Chakraborty Spivak: “Any theory of the imagination which uses the English word ‘imagination’ is no doubt linked in some way with the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century German theories. Our effort, however, is to reduce and rarefy this definition to a vulgar minimum—the ability to think absent things” (Spivak 2008: 4). Similar ideas resonate in several essays of her book Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization (Spivak 2012). Derrida’s notion of literary imagination along similar lines is quoted in this essay (Derrida 1984).
References
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2004). The open: Man and animal. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Balibar, E. (1991). Citizen subject: In Who comes after the subject. In E. Cadava P. Connor & J.-L. Nancy (Eds.), (pp. 33–57). New York: Routledge.
Barthes, R. (1975). S/Z. London: Cape.
Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida—reflections on photography. New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R. (1986). The reality effect in the Rustle of language (pp. 141–148). New York: Hill and Wang.
Bhattacharya, N. (2006). Lubdhak. Kolkata: Avijan Publishers.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1986). Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, J. (1984). No apocalypse, not now (full speed ahead, seven missiles, seven sissives), diacritics, nuclear criticism. Summer. 14(2), 20–31.
Derrida, J. (1988). Signature, even, context, In Limited Inc., 1–24. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Derrida, J. (2001). Writing and difference. [1978]. London and New York: Routledge.
Derrida, J. (2002). Of grammatology. [1976]. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
Derrida, J. (2002). The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow), In Critical Enquiry 28 (pp. 369–418).
Derrida, J. (2005). Rogues: Two essays on reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Derrida, J., & Stiegler, B. (2002). Echographies of television: Filmed interviews. Cambridge: Polity.
Eduardo, C. (1991). Who Comes After the Subject. In P. Connor J.-L. Nancy (Eds.), New York: Routledge.
Esposito, R. (2008). Bios, biopolitics and philosophy. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, F. (1990). The history of sexuality: an introduction (Vol. 1). London: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and Power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. London: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the college de France, 1978–1979. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilles, D. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. Winter. 59, 2–7.
Giovanna, B. (2003) Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (2008). The question concerning technology In Krell D. F. (Eds.), Martin heidegger: basic writings, (pp. 307–342). London: Harperperinnial Modern Thought.
Nabarun, B. (2010). Ekta Lok o Ekta Kukur, In Mahajaner Ayna: A collection of bengali short stories, (pp. 27–29). Kolkata: Bhashabandhan Prakashani.
Sengupta, S. (2012) Dog-story or how to write a parable of postcoloniality. In Sambalpur Studies in Literatures and Cultures: Identities, Inflections & Imperatives, Series— (Vol. 2, pp. 32–44).
Sengupta, S. (2014) Autoimmunity and the irony of self-definition: Translating the economy of terror, In Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry, Issue: Terror and the Literary, ( Vol. I No. I). https://sanglapjournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/samrat_final.pdf
Spivak, G. C. (2008) Other Asias. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Spivak, G. C. (2012) An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Stiegler, B. (1994). Technics and time, 1: The fault of epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, B. (2002). The Discrete Image In Echographies of Television: Filmed Interviews. Cambridge: Polity.
Stiegler, B. (2009). Technics and time, 2: Disorientation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sengupta, S. (2016). Information-Power: Teletechnology and the Ethics of Human–Animal Difference. In: Banerji, D., Paranjape, M. (eds) Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures . Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3635-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3637-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)