Advertisement

Two Senses of the Post in Posthumanism

  • Pal Ahluwalia
Chapter

Abstract

This essay draws attention to the implication of rupture in the idea of a Eurocentric posthumanism and indicates how such a rupture is premised in a classificatory system based on a normative humanism. A posthumanism of this kind, in its emergence, also extends its inverse double, the nonhuman monster, grafted onto the subaltern. As of our time, this periphery is represented most aptly by the Islamic terrorist. In place of this problematic rapturous ‘post,’ Ahluwalia invokes Paul Gilroy’s idea of pan-humanism, which revises post-Enlightenment humanism through multicultural engagement with its alternatives, a cultural micropolitics which consciously enlarges and extends individual and collective subjectivity. Such a pan-humanism can be thought of as a posthumanism, not a post which exceeds humanism but includes and surpasses it through an open-ended extension based in subjective cultural praxis.

Keywords

Colonial Project Islamic Terrorist Frantz Fanon Determined Mutuality Liberal Humanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahluwalia, D. P. S., Nursey-Bray, P. F. (1997). Australasia, ASAo & Conference tP 1997, Post-colonialism: culture and identity in Africa, Nova Science Pub Incorporated.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, M. (1865). Essays in criticism. Boston: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar
  3. Badmington, N. (2003) Theorizing posthumanism, Cultural Critique, 53, 10–27.Google Scholar
  4. Benjamin, W. (1923). One-Way-Street.Google Scholar
  5. Beville, M. (2009). Gothic-postmodernism: Voicing the terrors of postmodernity, Rodopi,Google Scholar
  6. Bhabha, H. (1986). Introduction in Frantz Fanon. Black Skin: White Mask, Pluto Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, Ronald S. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Césaire, A. (1972). Discourse on colonialism. New York: MR.Google Scholar
  9. Chakrabarty, D. (1992). Postcoloniality and the artifice of history: Who speaks for indian pasts? Representations, 37, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers, I. (2001). Culture after humanism: History, culture, subjectivity. New York: Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  11. Cheah, C. C. (2003). Approximate Jacobian robot control with adaptive Jacobian matrix, In: Proceedings of 42nd Ieee Conference on Decision and Control, Vols 1–6, pp. 5859–5864.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, T. (1997). Humanism, Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dinerstein, J. (2006). Technology and its discontents: On the verge of the posthuman (Technology and America), American Quarterly, 58(3), 569–595.Google Scholar
  14. Elliott, A. (2013). Reinvention, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  15. Fanon, F. (1967a). The wretched of the earth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Fanon, F. (1967b). Black Skin. White Masks: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fanon, F. (1970). Toward the African revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Gandhi, L. (1998). Uncanny australia: sacredness and identity in a postcolonial nation. Meanjin, 57(4), 832–835.Google Scholar
  19. Gilroy, P. (2005). Multiculture, double consciousness and the war on terror, Patterns of Prejudice, 39(4), 431–443.Google Scholar
  20. Godzich, W. (2006). Fear without catharsis (Global reaction to terrorist attacks), Boundary 2-an International Journal of Literature and Culture, 33(3), 135–139.Google Scholar
  21. Haddour, A. (2001). Introduction: Remembering sartre. Routledge, London: Colonialism and Neocolonialism.Google Scholar
  22. Hayles, N.K. (2008). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hindess, B. (1996). No end of ideology, History of the Human Sciences, 9(2), 79–98.Google Scholar
  24. Kearney, R. (2005). Strangers. Gods and Monsters: Interpreting Otherness, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  25. Mani, L. (2009). Sacredsecular: Contemplative cultural critique, Routledge Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). Edward said: Continuing the conversation. Critical Inquiry, 31(2), 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Puar, J. K., & Rai, A. (2002). Monster, terrorist, fag: The war on terrorism and the production of docile patriots. Social Text, 20(3), 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rai, A. S. (2004). Of monsters, Cultural Studies, 18(4) 538–570.Google Scholar
  29. Rose, N. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Said, E.W. (1978). Orientalism, Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  31. Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and imperialism, Vintage.Google Scholar
  32. Said, E. W. (2004). Humanism and democratic criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Seth, V. (2003). Difference with a difference: Wild men, gods and other protagonists, Parallax, 9(4) 75–87.Google Scholar
  34. Young, R. (1990). White mythologies: Writing history and the West. New York: Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PortsmouthPortsmouthUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations