Durga, Supermom, and the Posthuman Mother India

  • Sucharita Sarkar


As a phobic response, patriarchal discourse often images the mother as monstrous, especially any deviance from the culturally prescribed norms of motherhood. Advocating birth control as mother right, Margaret Sanger characterized the maternal body as a ‘breeding machine’. Technology and reproduction have always had an ambivalent and conflicted relationship. While radical feminists have seen technology-assisted reproduction as a liberating solution from the bondage of motherhood, Rosi Braidotti, in ‘Mothers, Monsters and Machines’, critiques the erasure of mothers by the ‘high-tech affair’ of the New Reproductive Technologies. In India, these technologies are often less about female choice than about male control, especially when manipulated to ensure male heirs. Then again, there is the ‘yummy mummy’, who uses any intervention, from surgery to surrogacy, to mutate her body to technologically perfected dimensions. Is she a prototype of the posthuman mother, and what are the feminist responses to this phenomenon? Shifting from the ‘experience’ to ‘image’ of mothering, the Indian mass and social media has widely circulated the image of the ‘supermom’ a mutated, mythic, multiple-armed, multitasking being who is effortlessly capable, with a little help from an assemblage of machine servants, of negotiating parallel universes of home, self and work. How is this domestic goddess related to the cyberfeminism of Donna Haraway, who declared she would rather be a cyborg than a goddess? How do ‘real’ mothers respond: with hope, conformity, mimicry, anxiety or resistance? Can she choose to be a supermom, or is the futuristic image coercive?


Assist Reproductive Technology Cosmetic Surgery Medical Tourism Maternal Body Surrogate Mother 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adams, A. E. (1994). Reproducing the womb: Images of childbirth in science, feminist theory, and literature. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allenby, B., & Sarewitz, D. (2011). The techno-human condition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aravamudan, G. (2010). Unbound: Indian women @ work. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (2010 (1990)). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Chatterjee, P. (2011). I thought being born in a test tube was normal. The Indian Express, September 18, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Chavkin, W., & Maher, J. M. (Eds.). (2010). The globalization of motherhood: Deconstructions and reconstructions of biology and care. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chopra, A. (2013). The front row: Aishwarya Rai Bachchan. India Real Time Blog, January 4. Accessed January 12, 2014.
  10. Cosmetic Surgery Bangalore. (2014). Mommy makeover. Accessed January 12, 2014.
  11. D’Adamo, A. F., & Baruch, E. H. (1986). Whither the womb? Myths, machines and mothers. Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies, 9, 72–79.Google Scholar
  12. Dadyburjor, F. J. (2014). Lights…camera…motherhood. HiBlitz, January. Mumbai, 70–81.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, B. (2011). Multiple identity crisis. In S. P. Walravens (Ed.) Torn: True stories of kids, career and the conflict of modern motherhood (pp. 99–101). Seattle: Coffeetownpress.Google Scholar
  14. Doniger, W. (2009). The hindus: An alternative history. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: Morrow Quill.Google Scholar
  16. France, A. W. (2001). Historicizing the posthuman. JAC, 21(1), 175–183.Google Scholar
  17. Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, M. (2013). Mommyblogs and the changing face of motherhood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  21. Halberstam, J. M., & Livingston, I. (Eds.). (1995). Posthuman bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Haraway, D. (2013 (1991)). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  24. Hayles, K. N. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heyes, C. J., & Jones, M. (Eds.). (2009). Cosmetic surgery: A feminist primer. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. India Surgery Blog. (2012). Mommy makeover combination procedure: Plastic surgery after childbirth, July 18. Accessed December 24, 2013.
  28. Indian moms connect (2013). Conversations on motherhood. Accessed September 3, 2013.
  29. Indian Homemaker. (2013). The life and times of an indian homemaker. Accessed July 21, 2013.
  30. Iyer, L. (2013). I’m pregnant, not terminally ill, you idiot!. New Delhi: Amaryllis.Google Scholar
  31. Kaplan, A. E., & Squier, S. M. (1999). Playing dolly: Technocultural formations, fantasies and fictions of assisted reproduction. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kapoor, K. (2013). My yummy mummy guide: From getting pregnant to being a successful working mom and beyond. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Keci, U. (2010). Infertility of indian establishment. Indian News and Analysis, October 24. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  34. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  35. Mackenzie Brown, C. (1992). The triumph of the goddess: The canonical models and theological visions of the Devi-Bhagavata Purana. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Manzoor, S. (2012). Aishwarya Rai’s post-baby body forces India to confront its attitude towards women. The Guardian, May 15, 2012.Google Scholar
  37. Maushart, S. (1999). The mask of motherhood: How becoming a mother changes everything and why we pretend it doesn’t. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Menon, N. (2012). Seeing like a feminist. New Delhi: Zubaan/Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Moravec, Hans. (1990). Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mumbai Mirror (2014). Swedish doctors transplant wombs into nine women, January 14, 2015.Google Scholar
  41. Nash, M. (2012). Making ‘Postmodern’ mothers: Pregnant embodiment, baby bumps and body image. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Negra, D. (2009). What a girl wants? Fantasizing the reclamation of self in postfeminism. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Pande, A. (2010). Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect ‘Worker-Mother’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(4), 969–994.Google Scholar
  44. Peskowitz, M. (2005). The truth behind the mommy wars: Who decides what makes a good mother. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  45. Plante, E. M. (1995). The American kitchen, 1700 to the present: From hearth to highrise. New York: FactsOnFile.Google Scholar
  46. PTI. (2012). Aishwarya Rai’s shape, a subject of intense debate. Indiatoday, May 3. Accessed January 11, 2014.
  47. Purohit, A. (2013). Lady, you’re not a man!. New Delhi: Rupa.Google Scholar
  48. Qadeer, I., & John, M.E. (2008). Surrogacy politics., December 25. Accessed December 24, 2013.
  49. Ramasundaram, A. (2011). The working mother, a winner all the way. The Hindu, August 19.Google Scholar
  50. Ramaswamy, S. (2011). The goddess and the nation: Mapping mother India. New Delhi: Zubaan.Google Scholar
  51. Realself Worth it Reviews. (2014). Accessed January 14, 2014.
  52. Redfern, C., & Aune, K. (2010). Reclaiming the F word: The new feminist movement. New York, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  53. Rich, A. (1995 (1986)). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  54. Rothman, B. K. (2007). Beyond mothers and fathers: Ideology in a patriarchal society. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), Maternal theory: Essential readings (pp. 390–407). Toronto: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sarojini, N., & Marwah, V. (2013). Shake her, she is like the tree that grows money!—Contexts and critiques in surrogacy. In J. Misra (Ed.), Of mothers and others: Stories, essays, poems (pp. 185–206). New Delhi: Zubaan.Google Scholar
  56. Sheer, A. (2011). Will the real mothers please stand up? In S. P. Walravens (Ed.) Torn: True stories of kids, career and the conflict of modern motherhood (pp. 81–83). Seattle: Coffeetownpress.Google Scholar
  57. Stallybrass, P. (1986). Patriarchal territories: The body enclosed. In M. Ferguson, M. Quilligan, & N. Vickers (Eds.), Rewriting the renaissance: The discourse of sexual difference in early modern Europe (pp. 123–142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Stewart, B. (2009). The cyborg momifesto. Crib Chronicles, June 23. Accessed September 21, 2013.
  59. Sukumaran, S. (2013). I feel stronger: Kiran Rao. People, June 28, 43–46.Google Scholar
  60. Wilson, A. A. (2013). Modernism, monsters and Margaret Sanger. Modern Fiction Studies, 59(2), 440–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolf, N. (2002 (1991)). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.D.T.S.S. College of CommerceUniversity of MumbaiMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations