The Critical Turn in Posthumanism and Postcolonial Interventions



This chapter introduces the concept of the volume and its constituent essays. Critical Posthumanism has received increasing attention in recent times; but this volume attempts to open a new chapter in posthuman studies by bringing South Asian postcolonial considerations into the scholarship, with regard both to their subaltern critiques and their archives of positive engagement and transformation. In keeping with this objective, the volume has been divided into three sections containing five essays each - “Critical Theory – The Posthuman Turn,” “Subalternity and Posthumanism” and “Reconstructions.” The first section deals with critical cartographies of posthumanism, the second views posthumanism through a postcolonial, subaltern and feminist lenses; and the third seeks solutions from premodern and postmodern sources, particularly belonging to South Asia, related to planetary outcomes.


Control Society Spiritual Tradition Global Technology American Pragmatism Power Hierarchy 


  1. Bhabha, H. (1994). Of mimicry and man: the ambivalence of colonial discourse. The Location of Culture. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October (Vol. 59, Winter, 1992, pp. 3–7). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Brian Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1996). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (2001) Fearless speech. In Joseph Pearson (Ed.), Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  9. Gilroy, P. (1995). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Cambride, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, M. (1998). “Letter on Humanism,” Pathmarks. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kroker, A. (2014). Exits to the posthuman future. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (Catherine Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics (Libby Meintjes, Trans.). Public Culture. 15(1), 11–40.Google Scholar
  15. Nietzsche, F. (1961/1969). Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and No One (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  16. Parikka, J. (2014). The anthrobscene. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Simondon, G. (2016). On the mode of existence of technical objects (Cecile Malaspina Trans.). Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California Institute of Integral StudiesSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Jawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations