Skip to main content

Online Graph Partitioning with an Affine Message Combining Cost Function

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Big Data Analytics
  • 5023 Accesses

Abstract

Graph partitioning is a key step in developing scalable data mining algorithms on massive graph data such as web graphs and social networks. Graph partitioning is often formalized as an optimization problem where we assign graph vertices to computing nodes with the objection to both minimize the communication cost between computing nodes and to balance the load of computing nodes. Such optimization was specified using a cost function to measure the quality of graph partition. Current graph systems such as Pregel, Graphlab take graph cut, i.e. counting the number of edges that cross different partitions, as the cost function of graph partition. We argue that graph cut ignores many characteristics of modern computing cluster and to develop better graph partitioning algorithm we should revise the cost function. In particular we believe that message combing, a new technique that was recently developed in order to minimize communication of computing nodes, should be considered in designing new cost functions for graph partitioning. In this paper, we propose a new cost function for graph partitioning which considers message combining. In this new cost function, we consider communication cost from three different sources: (1) two computing nodes establish a message channel between them; (2) a process creates a message utilize the channel and (3) the length of the message. Based on this cost function, we develop several heuristics for large graph partitioning. We have performed comprehensive experiments using real-world graphs. Our results demonstrate that our algorithms yield significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art approaches. The new cost function developed in this paper should help design new graph partition algorithms for better graph system performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Malewicz G, Austern MH, Bik AJ, Dehnert JC, Horn I, Leiser N et al (2010) Pregel: a system for large-scale graph processing. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International conference on management of data, 2010, pp 135–146

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avery C (2011) Giraph: Large-scale graph processing infrastruction on Hadoop. In: Proceedings of Hadoop Summit. Santa Clara, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zaharia M, Chowdhury M, Franklin MJ, Shenker S, Stoica I (2010) Spark: cluster computing with working sets. In: Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX conference on Hot topics in cloud computing,pp. 10–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Low Y, Gonzalez J, Kyrola A, Bickson D, Guestrin C, Hellerstein JM (2010) Graphlab: a new framework for parallel machine learning. arXiv:1006.4990

  5. Shao B, Wang H, Li Y (2013) Trinity: a distributed graph engine on a memory cloud. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Management of data, 2013, pp 505–516

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ke Q, Prabhakaran V, Xie Y, Yu Y, Wu J, Yang J (2011) Optimizing data partitioning for data-parallel computing. HotOS XIII

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kernighan BW, Lin S (1970) An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. Bell Syst Tech J 49:291–307

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiduccia CM, Mattheyses RM (1982) A linear-time heuristic for improving network partitions. In: 19th Conference on Design Automation, 1982, pp 175–181

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feige U, Krauthgamer R (2002) A polylogarithmic approximation of the minimum bisection. SIAM J Comput 31:1090–1118

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng AY (2002) On spectral clustering: analysis and an algorithm

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karypis G, Kumar V (1998) A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J Sci Comput 20:359–392

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. LÜcking T, Monien B, Elsässer R (2001) New spectral bounds on k-partitioning of graphs. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, pp 255–262

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abou-Rjeili A, Karypis G (2006) Multilevel algorithms for partitioning power-law graphs. In: 20th International parallel and distributed processing symposium, 2006. IPDPS 2006, 10 pp

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dean J, Ghemawat S (2008) MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 51:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang U, Tsourakakis CE, Faloutsos C (2009) Pegasus: a peta-scale graph mining system implementation and observations. In: Ninth IEEE International conference on data mining, 2009. ICDM’09, 2009, pp 229–238

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez JE, Low Y, Gu H, Bickson D, Guestrin C (2012) Powergraph: Distributed graph-parallel computation on natural graphs. In: Proceedings of the 10th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI), 2012, pp 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bourse F, Lelarge M, Vojnovic M (2014) Balanced graph edge partition

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stanton I, Kliot G (2012) Streaming graph partitioning for large distributed graphs. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2012, pp 1222–1230

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsourakakis C, Gkantsidis C, Radunovic B, Vojnovic M (2014) Fennel: Streaming graph partitioning for massive scale graphs. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, 2014, pp 333–342

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leskovec J, Krevl A (2014) SNAP Datasets: Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was supported by the US NSF grant CNS 1337899: MRI: Acquisition of Computing Equipment for Supporting Data-intensive Bioinformatics Research at the University of Kansas, 2013–2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Huan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, X., Huan, J. (2016). Online Graph Partitioning with an Affine Message Combining Cost Function. In: Pyne, S., Rao, B., Rao, S. (eds) Big Data Analytics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3628-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics