Skip to main content

Trigate FETs and FINFETs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Nanoelectronics

Part of the book series: NanoScience and Technology ((NANO))

  • 2910 Accesses

Abstract

The ever-increasing leakage current with every successive generation of MOSFET urged the researchers to look for a revolutionary change in device architecture. The changeover to SOI-MOSFET, particularly the FD-SOI-MOSFET , succeeded to a large extent in meeting the challenges without any fundamental modification of the structure. Alternative choices proposed were trigate FET and FINFET structures, which marked the end of planar era and entailed a radical change from a planar device to a three-dimensional shape for rejuvenating the IC industry. This chapter explains how wrapping the gate insulator around the body region of a MOSFET is an effective way of increasing the capability of the gate to mitigate the various encumbrances faced with short-channel devices. A comparative study of FINFETs fabricated on SOI wafers and bulk silicon wafers is presented. The neck-to-neck battle between FINFET and FD-SOI-MOSFET to clinch the supreme position is described by pointing out their relative beneficial aspects and downsides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kedzierski J, Ieong M, Kanarsky T et al (2004) Fabrication of metal gated FinFETs through complete gate silicidation with Ni. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 51(12):2115–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang J-W, Fossum JG (2005) On the feasibility of nanoscale triple-gate CMOS transistors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 52(6):1159–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hisamoto D, Lee Wen-Chin, Kedzierski J et al (2000) A self-aligned double-gate MOSFET scalable to 20 nm. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 47(12):2320–2325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jurczak M, Collaert N, Veloso A et al (2009) Review of FINFET technology, SOI Conference, 2009 IEEE International, 5–8 Oct 2009, Foster City, CA, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Swinnen M, Duncan R (2013) Physical verification of FINFET and FD-SOI devices. © 2012 The Curation Company. http://www.techdesignforums.com/practice/technique/physical-verification-design-finfet-fd-soi/Accessed. Accessed 7 Oct 2015

  6. Kedzierski J, Fried DM, Nowak EJ et al (2001) High-performance symmetric-gate and CMOS-compatible Vt asymmetric-gate FinFET devices. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international electron devices meeting (IEDM’01), pp 437–440

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhattacharya D, Jha NK (2014) FinFETs: From devices to architectures. Adv Electron 2014, Article ID 365689, 21 p

    Google Scholar 

  8. Poole I (2015) Radio-Electronics.com: FinFET technology & basics © Adrio Communications Ltd. http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/data/semicond/fet-field-effect-transistor/finfet-technology-basics.php. Accessed 7 Oct 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinod Kumar Khanna .

Review Exercises

Review Exercises

  1. 7.1

    Why is a large portion of substrate of no use to device operation in bulk silicon MOSFET? What harmful effects does this unutilized portion of substrate produce?

  2. 7.2

    Elaborate the effects of thickness of the body region of a nanoscale MOSFET on its performance.

  3. 7.3

    How does the deployment of multiple gates affect the operation of a MOSFET?

  4. 7.4

    Explain the origin of the name of FINFET device from its construction.

  5. 7.5

    Is FINFET an SOI-MOSFET? Give reasons for your answer.

  6. 7.6

    How does the substrate of a FINFET made from bulk silicon wafer impair its functioning? What remedy do you suggest?

  7. 7.7

    Which of the two devices is susceptible to self-heating? FINFET or FD-SOI-MOSFET? Why?

  8. 7.8

    Why is the drive current of a FINFET said to be quantized?

  9. 7.9

    Why cannot a single FINFET device made of a thicker body region supply a larger drive current? Why is it necessary to connect several fins in parallel?

  10. 7.10

    Point out the pros and cons of FINFET with respect to FD-SOI-MOSFET.

  11. 7.11

    How does a shorted gate FINFET differ from an isolated gate FINFET? Discuss their relative merits and demerits.

  12. 7.12

    Name three types of FINFETs classified on the basis of asymmetry. How do these classifications relate to interchangeability of source and drain?

  13. 7.13

    Why is FINFET less vulnerable to random doping effects than planar MOSFET? What type of variations cannot be avoided with FINFET?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khanna, V.K. (2016). Trigate FETs and FINFETs . In: Integrated Nanoelectronics. NanoScience and Technology. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3625-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics