Abstract
The purpose of the decision-making process is to determine the results while committing a categorical statement or proposition. A statement or proposition is a sentence which is either true or false. A categorical proposition or statement relates two classes or categories. This process is used widely in many disciplines, for example, in complex scientific, engineering, economical, and management situations. It is necessary to consider all possible rational, heuristic, and intuitive selections so that we can summarize the results in arriving at a decision. The diversified and broad range of interests for understanding this process have induced scientific researcher also to employ a diverse and broad range of research methodologies. They began by exploring other related but independent avenues of thinking, for example, taking into account the many methods of empirical observations, together with developing essentially-related mathematical analysis, including many kinds of computational modelling. Following this mode of search, it would be possible, theoretically, to identify a method for making crucial observations. In turn, its consequences continue to enrich philosophical discourses and to further fragment decision research. Many major attempts have been made to develop independent perspectives connected to various frameworks, such as; game theory, Bayesian models, and expected utility models; models connected to behavioral decision; and approaches related to information processing for neural networks and cognitive architectures. It has already been recognized that axiomatic, as well as other kind of rigorous models of the cognitive decision making, are very much needed. The recent empirical findings in the cognitive domain clearly suggest the necessity of changing the paradigm from classical Bayesian probability theory to quantum probability to construct the model of decision making in a consistent manner. However, quantum probability is an extension of quantum logic which only incorporates the contradictions arising out of the simultaneous existence of two mutually exclusive events in a logical way rather than discarding them. It gives rise to a new possibility to model certain degrees of contradictions involved in emotions, as well as to quantify the effect of emotions on judgments and decision making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., Gabora, L., & Sozzo, S. (2013). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 274-276.
Arndt, M., Nairz, O. & Vos-Andreae et al (1999). Nature, 401,680-682.
Bayes, T. (1763/1958). Biometrica, 45,296-315.
Beers R.J. van, Wolpart, D.M. & Haggart, P. (2002). Current Biology;12(100; 834-837.
Box, G.E.P. & Tiao, G.C. (1973). Bayesian Inference in Statistical analysis.Wiley; ISBN 0-471-57428-7.
Busemeyer, J. R., Wang, Z., & Townsend, J. T. (2006). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50(3), 220-241.
Chatter N., Tenenbaum J.B. et al. (2006). Trends in Cognitive Science, Elsevier.
Clark, L. (2010). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, B. Biol. Sci.; 365;(1538):319-330.; ibid; (2013); Behavioral and Brain Sciences, p 181-204; doi 10.1017/S01405X12000477.
Conte, E., Khrennikov, A. Y., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Mendolicchio, L., & Zbilut, J. P. (2009). Mental states follow quantum mechanics during perception and cognition of ambiguous figures. Open Systems & Information Dynamics, 16(01), 85-100.
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1996). Cognition, Elsevier.; ibid; (2005); Evolutionary psychology, “Conceptual foundations, D.M. Buss (ed.); Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology”, New York, Wiley.
Dempster, P. (1967). Annals of mathematical Statistics, 38, 325-339.
Derksen, H.E. & Verveen, A. (1966). Science,151;1388-1389.
Edwards Ward (1954), Psychological bulletin;41;380-417.
Einhorn, H.J. & Hogarth, M. (1981). Ann. Rev. Psychol.,32,53-88.
Feynman, R., Leighton, R.R. & Sands, M. (1964,1966). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, 3 volumes; ibid; Feynman, R. & Hibbs, A.R. (1965); “Quantum Mechanics & Path Integrals”;McGraw-Hill, New York.
Frieden, B. Roy (1998, 2004). Science from Fisher information; AUnification; Cambridge University Press.
Gershenson Carlos (1999). Modelling Emotions with Multidimensional Logic; http://cogprints.org/1479/1/mdlemotions.html.
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception; (Houghton Mifflin).
Giang, P.H. & Shenoy, P.P. (2005). European Journal of Operational Research, 162,(2),450-467.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Psychological review, 98(4), 506.
Griffiths,T.L., Kemp, C. & Tenenbaum,J.B. (2008). Bayesian Models of Cognition in R.Sun(ed.), Cambridge University;
Griffiths, T. L., Chater, N., Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2010). Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(8), 357-364.
Hacking Ian, M. (1975). The emergence of probability: A Philosophical Study of Early ideas about Probability, Cambridge University Press;
Hanggi, P. (2002); A European Journal Chem Phys Chem of Chemical Physics and and Physical Chemistry “Chem.phys.Chem” 3, pp. 285-290.
Haven E. & Khrennikov A. (2013). Quantum Social Science. Cambridge University Press, p. 128.
Heisenberg, W. (1968). In “Quantum Theoretical Reinterpretation of Kinetic and Mechanical Reactions” Sources of quantum Mechanics(English translation); ed. B.L. Van der Waerden.
Horvitz, E. (1999). CHI’99. Proceedings of the Sigchi conference on Human factors in Computing systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159-165
Kadane, J.R. & Larkey, P.D. (1982). Management Science, 28(2) pp. 113-120.
Kahneman, D. (2003). American psychologist; 58(9), 697-720
Kolmogorov, A.N (1933/1950). Foundations of theory of probability, N.Y., Chelsea Publ Co.
Kozima, H. (2013). Japanese Psychol. Research, Special issue: Cognitive Sci. approach to Developmental disorders”; H. Murohashi(ed.) 55(2),168-174.
Krifka, M. (1990). Papers from the 2 nd Symposium on Logic & language, Lászlo Kámán & Pólos(eds.); Budapest.
Kwisthout John & Van Rooij (2013). Bridging the gap between theory and Practice of Approximate Baysian Inferences: Cognitive System Research 09/2013.
Laplace: “Memoire sur les Probabilities” (1774). See discussion by E. C. Molina in “Theory of Probability, Some Comments on Laplace’s Theorie Analytique,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, ¥oi. 36; (June 1930); pp. 369-392.
Lasky, K.B. & Cohen, M.S. (1986). “WSC’86: procd. of the 18 th . Conference on Winter simulation”; pp 440-444, ACM, Newyork, NY, USA.
Lerner S. Jennifer et al (2014). Emotion and Decision Making (16 June, 2014, Draft paper).
Lindley, D.V. (1987). The probability approach to the treatment of uncertainty; Statistical Science, 2;(1), 3-44.
Lisa Zyga (2014) http://phys.org/news/2014-03-quantum-theory-cognition-memories.html
Manski, C. F. (1977). The structure of random utility models. Theory and decision, 8(3), 229-254.
Manski, C.F. & Lerman, S.R. (1977-1988). Econometrica: Journal of the econometric Society.
McCollum, Gin (1999). Int.Journ.Phys., 38(12),19991201,3253-3267.
Minsky, M.L. (1985). The society of Mind, Simon and Shuster, Old Tappan, NJ.
Mittelstaedt P. (2011). Rational reconstruction of Modern Physics, Springer.
Oaksford, M. & Chatter, N. (2007). The probabilistic approach to Human reasoning”; Oxford University press.
Pearl J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo.
Pellionisz A. & Llinás R. (1982). Neuroscience; 7(12), 2949-7.
Roy, S. & Llinás, R. (2008). Dynamic Geometry, Brain function modelling and Consciousness; Eds. R. Banerjee & B.K. Chakravorty; Progress in Brain research; 168, 133.
Roy, S. & Llinás, R. (2012). Role of Noise in Brain function; Science; Image in action; Eds. Z. Bertrand et al., World Scientific Publishers, Singapore; pp 34-44.
Roy,S. & Llinás, R. (2012). Metric Tensor as degree of coherence in the dynamical organization of the central nervous system(CNS), Procd. Mathematics of Distances & Applications; eds. by M.M. Deja, M. Petitzen, K. Markov) (ITHEA, Sophia), pp 169.
Salazar R., Jara-Figueroa C., and Delgado A. (2014). Analogue of the quantum total probability rule from Paraconsistent Bayesian probability theory; arXiv:1408.5308 v 1.
Shafer Glen A. (2008). A better interpretation of Probabilities and Dempster-Shafer degrees of Belief; www.glenshafer.com/p/assets/downloads/dsbetting.pdf
Schuster, A. (1904). An Introduction to the Theory of Optics, London: Edward Arnold.
Spanos, A. (1999). Probability Theory and Statistical Inference, Cambridge University press.
Wang, Y. (2003): Brain and Mind:A Transdisciplinary Journal of Neuroscience and Neurophilosophy, 4(2), 151-167.
Wang Y. (2005a) Brain and Mind: A Transdisciplinary Journal of Neuroscience & Neurophilosophy;4(2), 199-213.
Wang Y. (2005b) In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI’05) (294-300), IEEE CS Press, Irvin, California, USA, August; ibid; (2005b); A novel decision grid theory for dynamic decision-making. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI’05), (308-314), IEEE CS Press, Irvin, California,USA, August; ibid;
Wang, Y. (2007); The Int. l Journ. of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 1(1), 1-271(1), Cognitive Informatics (ICCI’03) (pp. 93-97) London, UK.,73,33-36.
Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2004); IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (C); 36(2), 203-207.
Wang Y. and Ruhe G. (2007). Int. Journ. of Cognitive Informatics & Natural Intelligence, 1(2), 73-85, 73.
Weisman K. & Moss F. (1995). Nature, 373 (6509): 33–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roy, S. (2016). Introduction. In: Decision Making and Modelling in Cognitive Science. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3622-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3622-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3620-7
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3622-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)