Purdah and Politics: Women’s Participation in Local Governance

Part of the Exploring Urban Change in South Asia book series (EUCS)


This chapter explores the results of fieldwork conducted on municipal governance in tier-3 towns in the NCR-Haryana area. In an effort to gauge the nature of democratic decentralised governance in emerging urban areas, field-based knowledge points to avenues of effective participation for elected women representatives. Founded on gender-based affirmative action policies to increase the political participation of women, the 74th CAA delivers mechanisms to balance gender injustice and the non-participation of women in political decision-making. Tracing the social, cultural, economic, political and religious capital in select female representatives, this chapter illustrates the requisite forms of capital that allow effective participation versus a proxy status. To nuance the understanding of ‘effective participation’, the tasks of a political seat must be deconstructed and viewed from the perspective of the socially accepted actions that women can pursue, without facing barriers. This deconstruction makes it easier to understand what women can actually accomplish, which tasks they are less involved in, the dynamics of sharing these tasks with male relatives, and hence, the ways and means of augmenting their participation.


Political Participation Urban Space Local Governance Male Relative Affirmative Action Policy 


  1. Baud, I. S. A., & De Wit, J. (2009). New forms of urban governance in India: Shifts, models, networks and contestations. Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Beall, J. (2004). Decentralisation and engendering democracy: Lessons from local government reform in South Africa. Crisis States Research Centre working papers series (Vol. 1, p. 54). London, UK: Crisis States Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  3. Bhavnani, R. R. (2009). Do electoral quotas work after they are withdrawn? Evidence from a natural experiment in India. American Political Science Review, 103(01), 23–35. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409090029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdhry, P. (2004). Caste panchayats and the politics of marriage in Haryana. In D. Gupta (Ed.), Caste in question: Identity or hierarchy. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Chowdhry, P. (1993). Persistence of a custom: Cultural centrality of ghunghat. Social Scientist, 21(9/11), 91–112. doi: 10.2307/3520428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorlin, E. (2012). L’Atlantique féministe. L’intersectionnalité en débat. Papeles del CEIC, septiembre 2012 (83). Available at http://www.identidadcolectiva.es/pdf/83.pdf, 16.
  8. Goetz, A. M. (2004) Decentralization and gender equality. Striving for gender equality in an unequal world: UNDP Report for Beijing +10. N.p.: UNDP, 2004. Chap 12. Print.Google Scholar
  9. Ghosh, A., & Lama-Rewal, S. T. (2005). Democratization in progress. Women and local politics in urban India. New Delhi: Tulika Books.Google Scholar
  10. Jayal, N. G. (2006). Engendering local democracy: The impact of quotas for women in India’s panchayats. Democratization, 13(1), 15–35. doi: 10.1080/13510340500378225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. John, M. E. (2007). Women in power? Economic & Political Weekly, XLII(39), 3986–3993.Google Scholar
  12. Kennedy, L. (2009). New patterns of participation shaping urban governance. In J. Ruet, & S. Tawa Lama-Rewal (Eds.), Governing India’s metropolises. Case studies of four cities (pp. 55–80). Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Lama-Rewal, S. T. (2011). Women’s right to the city: From safety to citizenship? In M. H. Zérah, V. Dupont & S. Tawa Lama-Rewal (Eds.), Urban Policies and the Right to the City in India (pp. 29–31). New Delhi: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  14. Mukhopadhyay, M. (2005). Decentralisation and gender equity in South Asia: An issues paper. In International Development Research Center 2005 (pp. 1–74). Idrc. Web http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Documents/WRC-Decentralization-documents/Maitrayee-Mukhopadhyay-Decentralization-and-Gender-Equity-in-South-Asia.pdf
  15. Mukhopadhyay, M., & Meer, S. (2004). Creating voice and carving space: Redefining governance from a gender perspective. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: KIT.Google Scholar
  16. Zérah, M.-H. (2017). Shedding light on social and economic changes in small towns through the prism of local governance: A case study of Haryana. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 371–395). New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute for Human SettlementsBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.CESSMA, Institute of Research for DevelopmentParisFrance

Personalised recommendations