Skip to main content

Introduction: Reclaiming Small Towns

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Subaltern Urbanisation in India

Part of the book series: Exploring Urban Change in South Asia ((EUCS))

Abstract

The introduction to this edited volume seeks to decenter and enlarge our conception of urbanisation, shifting the perspective from large agglomerations to smaller urban settlements in the specific case of India, and to discuss the main results produced by the collective research team that participated in the Subaltern Urbanization Research project. This chapter defines the notion of subaltern urbanisation and argues in favour of reclaiming research on small towns. The recent increase in interest in urban studies in the global south, and particularly in South Asia, around the dynamics of urban change mainly concerns the large agglomerations, which are perceived as the main sites of economic development and social and demographic changes. This research project and the resulting edited volume positions itself vis-à-vis a vision of planetary urbanisation reduced to metropolitanisation and competition between global cities. It aims at challenging the usual approach which tends to consider the urban world only through the prism of very large cities. It defends a methodology based on the articulation of scales and the need to develop a multidisciplinary dialogue between large-scale analysis of urbanisation and in-depth scrutiny of localised cases. The introduction presents the main results relating to the understanding of the expanding world of ordinary towns: their spatial distribution and their dynamics (demographic and economic) (part I), their socio-economic embeddedness, in particular the entrenched as well as fluid linkages between land, society and people (part II), the type of public policies and governance that characterise these small towns and their impact on the quality of life (part III) and the manner in which innovation, production and circulation of people actually shape their economic trajectories (part IV).

We are grateful to all the researchers who were part of the SUBURBIN team. They embarked with us on a long collective journey that enabled us to write this introductory piece. We would also like to thank Loraine Kennedy and Barbara Harriss-White for their reading of an earlier draft of this introduction and the anonymous reviewer who provided some insightful comments on the overall manuscript. We are also grateful for the careful editing of the manuscript by Renuka George. Over the course of this project we organised a series of workshops, one of them jointly with the urban studies team at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences that contributed to opening up debates on this work. Finally, this research project received the unwavering support from the Centre for Social Sciences and Humanities (New Delhi) and the French Institute of Pondicherry where we were deputed during the course of this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more details, refer to the literature review in Raman et al. (2015).

  2. 2.

    The canonical hierarchical urban model supposes a pyramidal distribution of power and competences mirroring the city-size distribution; it leaves limited capabilities and agency to small towns that are considered, rather, as dependent on the redistribution of banal activities from larger cities. Large cities concentrate the most innovative enterprises.

  3. 3.

    For a detailed discussion, refer to the literature review of this project, pp. 29–34 in Raman et al. (2015).

  4. 4.

    For a detailed discussion on this debate, refer to the literature review of this project, pp. 29–34, in Raman et al. (2015, pp. 85–89).

  5. 5.

    See the project website: www.suburbin.hypotheses.org.

  6. 6.

    The project was coordinated by the French Institute of Pondicherry and the Centre for Social Sciences and Humanities in New Delhi and involved the following partners: The Centre for Policy Research (New Delhi); the Centre for the Study of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University (New Delhi); the School of Planning and Architecture (New Delhi); the Department of Geography of Burdwan University (West Bengal); the School of Social Sciences (Indian Institute of Technology of Madras); and the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research in Mumbai.

  7. 7.

    Here, small towns are all agglomerations of between 10,000 and 100,000 inhabitants in 2011.

  8. 8.

    For instance, the area under the Bangalore Municipal Corporation almost doubled between 2001 and 2011.

  9. 9.

    Mandi towns have played a historical role in the shaping of the system of cities (see Haynes 1999) and a large number of small towns can still be considered “mandi towns”. This, for instance, is the case of Hodal, studied here but from a governance point of view. Krishnamurthy (2012) has recently studied the role of Haldia as a mandi town. The case of Gopalpur in West Bengal studied by Mukhopadhyay and Zérah (2015) is the story of a small Census town whose growth is linked to agro-processing activities.

  10. 10.

    See also Zérah (2013) on the entrepreneurialism in the villages of the NCR and the automobile corridor.

  11. 11.

    McDuie Ra’s work on Imphal (2016), a larger city, also highlights the role of secondary education and health institutions as drivers for growth.

  12. 12.

    For a detailed analysis of linkages between connectivity and regional integration, see the case of Bhopal (Gupta 2012).

References

  • Abu-Lughod, J. L. (1991). Before European hegemony: The world system AD 1250–1350. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anjaria, J. S., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Urban navigations: Politics, Space and the City in South Asia. Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, S. (2013). Highway urbanization and Land conflicts: The challenges to decentralization in India. Pacific Affairs, 86(4), 785–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., & Cheshire, J. (2011). Cities as flows, cities of flows. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(2), 195–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee-Guha, S. (2002). Shifting cities: Urban restructuring in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(2), 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basile, E. (2013). Capitalist Development in India’s Informal Economy, Routledge Contemporary South Asia Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., & Jayne, M. (2009). Small cities? Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 683–699. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00886.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, S. (2008). Occupancy urbanism: Radicalizing politics and economy beyond policy and programs. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, S. (2017). Multilayered urbanisation of the South Canara territory. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 199–233). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdegué, J. A., Carriazo, F., Jara, B., Modrego, F., & Soloaga, I. (2015). Cities, territories, and inclusive growth: unraveling urban-rural linkages in Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. World Development, 73, 56–71. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdegué, J. A., & Proctor, F. J. (2014a). Cities in the rural transformation. (p. 7). Santiago, Chile: Rimisp—Latin American Center for Rural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdegué, J. A., & Proctor, F. J. (2014b). Inclusive Rural–Urban Linkages. Working Paper, Document No. 122, Working Group: Development with Territorial Cohesion (pp. 118). Santiago, Chile: RIMISP-Centro Latinoamericano para el desarrollo rural.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2011). Planetary Urbanisation. In M. Gandy (Ed.), Urban constellations (pp. 11–13). Berlin: Jovis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson, D. F., Gough, K. V., Rigg, J., & Agergaard, J. (2009). Critical commentary. The world development report 2009. Urban Studies, 46(4), 723–738. doi:10.1177/0042098009102371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, T., & Maringanti, A. (2010). Practising urban and regional research beyond metrocentricity. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(2), 415–420. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00988.x

  • Castells M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley‐Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravorty, S. (2013). The price of land: Acquisition, conflict, consequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravorty, S., & Lall, S. (2007). Made in India. The economic geography and political economy of industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, S. (2017). Urbanisation in a decade of near jobless growth. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 119–140). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari, S. (2004). Fraternal capital: Peasant-workers, self-made men, and globalization in provincial India. Orient Blackswan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1933). Die zentralen Orte in Suddeutschland. Jena: G. Fischer, (Translated in part), by Charlisle W. Baskin, as Central Places in Southern Germany. Prentice Hall 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiaensen, L., & Todo, Y. (2014). Poverty reduction during the rural-urban transformation—the role of the missing middle. World Development, 63, 43–58. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, B., Chatterjee, B., Mazumdar, M., & Karim, S. (2017). Income ranking of Indian states and their pattern of urbanisation. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 91–118). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, K., & Vijayabaskar, M. (2014). On the charts, off the tracks. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(May 31), 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, L. A. (1977). Great tradition, little tradition: The cultural traditions of a Bengal Town. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 11(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Ricka, F., Suphaphiphat, N., Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: a global perspective. International Monetary Fund. SDN/15/13.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bercegol, R. (2016). Small towns and decentralisation in India: urban local bodies in the making. New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bercegol, R., & Gowda, S. (2017). Development on the urban fringe: The prosperity of Kartarpur, a small town-cluster in Punjab. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 473–495). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, E., & Ahmad, Z. (2017). On global and multiple linkages in the making of an ordinary place: Parangipettai-Porto Novo. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 167–195). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, E., & Marius-Gnanou, K. (2011). Toward a better appraisal of urbanisation in India. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 569, doi:10.4000/cybergeo

  • Denis, E., Mukhopadhyay, P., & Zérah, M.-H. (2012). Subaltern urbanisation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII(30), 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaile, G. L. (1992). Improving rural-urban linkages through small town market-based development. Third World Planning Review, 14(2), 131. doi:10.3828/twpr.14.2.f35v86q026g15485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, E., Kerr, W. R., & Tewari, I. (2014). Regional diversity and inclusive growth in Indian cities. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (6919).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, E., Goswami, A. G., & Kerr, W. R. (2012). Is India’s Manufacturing Sector Moving Away From Cities? (pp. 42). Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. (1976). The arguments for very large cities reconsidered. Urban Studies, 13, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. (1977). The arguments for very large cities reconsidered: A reply. Urban Studies (14), 225–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidwani, V. K. (2006). Subaltern cosmopolitanism as politics. Antipode, 38(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2010). Agglomeration economics (National Bureau of Economic Research conference report). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guérin, I., Michiel S., & Venkatasubramanian, G. (2014). Labour in contemporary south. In B. Harris-White & J. Geyer (Eds.), Indian Capitalism in Development (pp. 118–136). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2013). Measuring urbanization around a regional capital. The case of Bhopal district. Working papers series 6 & SUBURBIN Working Papers 1. USR savoirs et mondes indiens. http://f.hypotheses.org/wpcontent/blogs.dir/489/files/2013/01/A-Gupta-Periurban-Bhopal-WP6-1.pdf

  • Gururani, S. (2012). Flexible planning: The Making of India’s ‘Millenium City’, Gurgaon. In A. M. Rademacher & K. Sivaramakrishnan (Eds.), Ecologies of urbanism in India: Metropolitan civility and sustainability (pp. 119–144). Honk Kong: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss-White, B. (Ed.). (2015). Middle India and urban-rural development: Four decades of change. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, B., & Harriss, J. (1984). ‘Generative’ or ‘parasitic’ urbanism? Some observations from the recent history of a South Indian market town. The Journal of Development Studies, 20(3), 82–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriss-White, B. (2002, April). Poverty and disability: With special reference to rural South Asia. In Conference ‘Staying Poor: Chronic Poverty and Development Policy’, University of Manchester (pp. 7–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, G. (2010). Redrawing the map of the world? Reflections on the world development report 2009. Economic Geography, 86(4), 341–350. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01091.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, DE. (1999). Market Formation in Khandesh, c. 1820–1930. The Indian Economic and Social History Review, 36 (3), 275–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgers, M. (2012). Contribution à une anthropologie des villes secondaires. Cahiers d’Etudes Africaines, LII (I)(205), 29–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himanshu, H., Lanjouw, P., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Murgai, R. (2011). Non-farm diversification and rural poverty decline: A perspective from Indian sample survey and village study data. Working Paper 44. London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinderink, J., & Titus, M. (2002). Small towns and regional development: Major findings and policy implications from comparative research. Urban Studies, 39(3), 379–391. doi:10.1080/00420980220112748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, R., & Jeffery, P. (1997). Population, gender and politics: Demographic change in rural north India (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R., Kennedy, L., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2014). Power, policy, and protest: The politics of India’s special economic zones. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedwab, R., & Vollrath, D. (2015). Urbanization without growth in Historical Perspective, IIEP Working Paper, no. 2015-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, L. & Deekshit, P. (2014). Planning as practice? Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(May 31), 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. (2017). The other Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission: What does it mean for small town India? In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 337–370). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, M. (2012), States of Wheat: The Changing Dynamics of Public Procurement in Madhya Pradesh, Economic and Political Weekly, Review of Rural Affairs, (47)52, 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, A., & Bhatia, S. (2002). Industrial growth in small and medium towns and their vertical integration: The case of Gobindgarh, Punjab, India. Management of Social Transformations, MOST, Discussion Paper—No. 57. Delhi, UNESCO: 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, A. (2011). Politics and economics of urban growth. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVI, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, A., & Saraswati, L. R. (2012). Migration and exclusionary urbanisation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII(26 & 27), 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. V., Wang, H. G., & Deichmann, U. (2010). Infrastructure and city competitiveness in India (No. 2010, 22). Working paper//World Institute for Development Economics Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lionnet, F., & Shih, M. (Eds.). (2005). Minor transnationalism. Durham, London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (1977). Why poor people stay poor: A study of urban bias in world development. London, Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDuie-Ra, DA. (2016). Borderland city in new India: frontier to gateway, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevia, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2003). Municipal finances and development in small and medium towns: Comparing of Gujarat, Punjab and Andhra Pradesh. Working Paper Series no. 18: Institute for Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maringanti, A., Sheppard, E., & Zhang, J. (2009). Where is the geography? World Bank’s WDR 2009. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(29), 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marius-Gnanou, K., & Subramaniam, V. (2014). The case of an old industrial cluster in Tamil Nadu. Communication at the final seminar of the SUBURBIN project, April 2014, Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1991). The political place of locality studies. Environment and Planning, 23(2), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, C., Waibel, M., & Ebrary Inc. (2012). Urban informalities reflections on the formal and informal. (pp. xi, 201 p.). Farnham; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, D. (2017). Wealth, mobility, accretive citizenship and belonging: Why everyone comes to Kullu and how they remain. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 283–309). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mera, K. (1973). On the Urban agglomeration and economic efficiency. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 21(January), 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriconi-Ebrard, F., Denis, E., & Marius-Gnanou, K. (2010). Repenser la géographie économique». Les arrangements du rapport de la Banque Mondiale avec les sciences géographiques urbaines Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [Online], Débats, La Banque Mondiale et la géographie, url: http://cybergeo.revues.org/23144; doi:23110.24000/cybergeo.23144.

  • Mukhopadhyay P. (2012). Moving people and morphing places. (7 October). Mint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, P. (2017). Does administrative status matter for small towns in India? In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 443–469). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, P. & Zérah, M.-H. (2015). Understanding India’s Urban frontier. What is behind the emergence of Census Towns in India? Delhi, Centre for Policy Research and the World Bank, Vol. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukim, M., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2012). The location choices of foreign investors: A district-level analysis in India. The World Economy, 35(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni, M. (2017). Non-timber Forest Products and Small Town Economies. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 601–614). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, S., & Oldfield, S. (2014). The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (Vol. 2014). New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, K. C. (2013). Unacknowledged urbanisation: New census towns of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(36), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, K. C. (2017). Unacknowledged urbanisation: The new census towns in India. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 39–66). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, G. (2002). The urban turn. Sarai Reader, 2(The cities of everyday life), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad-Aleyamma, M. (2017). Territorial legends: Politics of indigeneity, migration and urban citizenship in Pasighat. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 261–282). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punia, M., Kumar, R., Singh, L., Kaushick, S. (2017). Comparison of Peripheral Metropolitanisation in Haryana and Rajasthan, India. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 141–165). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, B., Prasad-Aleyamma, M., Rémi de Bercegol, Denis E., & Zérah, M.-H. (2015). Selected readings on small town dynamics in India. In “Savoirs et Mondes Indiens” (Ed.), Suburbin Working Paper Series, n°2. Pondicherry and New Delhi, India: Institut Français de Pondicherry and Centre for Social Sciences and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, B. (2014). Patterns and practices of special transformation in non-metros: The case of Tiruchengode. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(22), 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, B. (2017). Practices of territory in small and medium cities of South India. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 235–260). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. W. (1976). The argument for very large cities reconsidered: A comment. Urban Studies, 13(3), 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigg, J., Bebbington, A., Gough, K. V., Bryceson, D. F., Agergaard, J., Fold, N., et al. (2009). The world development report 2009 ‘reshapes economic geography’: geographical reflections. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(2), 128–136. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00340.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development (Questioning Cities). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A. (1983). Towns and small cities in developing countries. Geographical Review, 73(4), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87. doi:10.1177/1473095208099299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A., & Ong, A. (2011). Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (Studies in urban and social change). Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukmani, R. (1994). Urbanisation and socio-economic change in Tamil Nadu, 1901–91. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(51/5), 3263–3272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, G. (2013). Urban governance reforms and basic services in West Bengal. In Challenges of urbanization in 21st Century. Vol. III: Planning and Governance. In Markandey and Lonavath (Eds.), Concept Publishing, (pp. 360–977) New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, G. (2014). The politics of classification and the complexity of governance in census towns. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(22), 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, G. (2017). New urban territories in West Bengal: Transition, transformation and governance. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 421–441). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffar, A., & Dimou, M. (2012). Rank-size city dynamics in China and India, 1981–2004. Regional Studies, 46(6), 707–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzberg, M. G. (1979). Island of privilege: Small cities in Africa and the dynamics of class formation. Urban Anthropology, 8(2 (summer)), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. (2012). Rejuvenating India’s small towns. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII(30), 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N. (1989). Medium towns of Bihar, a strategy in urban regional planning (1st ed., L N Mithila University publication, Vol. 4). Darbhanga: Publication Department, L.N. Mithila University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. N., & Sandhu, R. S. (2013). Small cities and towns in global era. Emerging changes and perspectives. New Delhi: Rawat Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2003). Persistence and stability in city growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(2), 300–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. (2017). Commuting workers and the integration of the rural-urban economy. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 577–600). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivaramakrishnan, K. C. (2011). Re-visioning Indian cities: The urban renewal mission. New Delhi: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sridharan, N. (2017). Globalisation, productive spaces and small town transformation: The case of Machlipatnam and Pedana in coastal Andra Pradesh. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 527–551). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surie, A., & Zérah, M.-H. (2017). Purdah and politics: Women’s participation in local governance. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 397–420). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerts, E. (2017). The substantial share of small towns in India’s system of cities. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 67–89). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerts, E., & Denis, E. (2017). Mapping small towns’ productive and employment configurations. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 553–576). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerts, E., & Pumain, D. (2013). Approche statistique de la cohésion territoriale: le système de villes en Inde. L’Espace géographique, 1, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tacoli, C. (1998). Rural-urban interactions: A guide to the literature. Environment and Urbanization, 10(1), 147–166. doi:10.1177/095624789801000105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tacoli, C. (2006). The Earthscan reader in rural-urban linkages. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tastevin, Y. P. (2017). From Ox-Carts to borewell rigs: Maintenance, manufacture and innovation in Tiruchengode. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 497–525). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouillet, P.-Y. (2017). Hindu temples and development of localities in Tamil Nadu (South India). In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 311–334). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, H., & Nelson, A. (2010). Agglomeration index: Towards a new measure of urban concentration. Working Paper 2010/29. Helsinki: United Nations University-World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Véron, R. (2010). Small cities, neoliberal governance and sustainable development in the global south: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Sustainability, 2(9), 2833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath, T., Lall, S. V., Dowall, D., Lozano-Gracia, N., Sharma, S., & Wang, H. G. (2013). Urbanization beyond Municipal Boundaries: Nurturing metropolitan economies and connecting Peri-Urban Areas in India. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009). Reshaping economic geography (World development report, Vol. 2009). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2015). Leveraging urbanization in South Asia. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zérah M.-H. (2013), The making of a mini-city, Infochange (special issue on urbanization), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zérah, M.-H. (2017). Shedding light on social and economic changes in small towns through the prism of local governance: A case study of Haryana. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zérah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 371–395). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. (2000). In situ urbanization in Rural China: Case studies from Fujian Province. Development and Change, 31(2), 413–434. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. (2002). Beyond large-city-centered urbanization: in situ transformation of rural areas in Fujian Province. Asia-Pacific View Point, 43(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Hélène Zérah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zérah, MH., Denis, E. (2017). Introduction: Reclaiming Small Towns. In: Denis, E., Zérah, MH. (eds) Subaltern Urbanisation in India. Exploring Urban Change in South Asia. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3616-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3616-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3614-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3616-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics