Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 396))

Abstract

Expression of opinions is basic human nature. With the advent of various online platforms, this expression has largely taken digital form. More often than not, it is in the interest of enterprises and individuals to know the sentiment of these opinions, be them in the form of reviews, blogs or articles. Given the humungous amount of this data, it becomes essential to analyze it programmatically and with accuracy. The paper looks at various methods of doing this and also suggests one which takes into account the sentence constructs and the way the sentences are framed. One of the primary concerns is also to detect and handle negations and contradictions occurring in the sentences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In: Proceedings of LREC. vol. 6, pp. 417–422 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grefenstette, G., Qu, Y., Shanahan, J. G., Evans, D. A.: Coupling niche browsers and affect analysis for an opinion mining application. In: RIAO. pp. 186–194 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. pp. 168–177. ACM (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, J., Lu, J., Ling, C. X.: Comparing naive bayes, decision trees, and svm with auc and accuracy. In: Data Mining, 2003. ICDM 2003. Third IEEE International Conference on. pp. 553–556. IEEE (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neviarouskaya, A., Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M.: Recognition of affect, judgment, and appreciation in text. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. pp. 806–814. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Niu, Y., Zhu, X., Li, J., Hirst, G.: Analysis of polarity information in medical text. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. vol. 2005, p. 570. American Medical Informatics Association (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10. pp. 79–86. Association for Computational Linguistics (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A.: Contextual valence shifters. In: Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications, pp. 1–10. Springer (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Winterstein, G., Huang, G. B.: Sentic patterns: Dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 45–63 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sangiorgi, P., Augello, A., Pilato, G.: An approach to detect polarity variation rules for sentiment analysis. In: Proc of WEBIST 2014–10th international conference on web information systems and technologies, 3–5 April (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing. pp. 347–354. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, H., Hatzivassiloglou, V.: Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing. pp. 129–136. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smriti Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Singh, S., Rout, J.K., Jena, S.K. (2016). Construct-Based Sentiment Analysis Model. In: Lobiyal, D., Mohapatra, D., Nagar, A., Sahoo, M. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal, Networks, Computing, and Systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 396. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3589-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3589-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3587-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3589-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics