Advertisement

Monetary Policy Transmission in the Presence of Product and Labor Market Frictions: The Case of India

  • Rahul Anand
  • Sonali Das
  • Purva Khera
Chapter

Abstract

Tightly regulated product and labor markets in India have resulted in a lack of competition in product markets and the development of a large informal sector. This paper studies the effect of frictions in product and labor markets on the effectiveness of monetary policy, using a small open-economy DSGE model with informal and formal sectors, monopolistic competition, price and wage stickiness, and endogenous firm entry. Product market regulation affects firm entry costs and the degree of competition, and labor market regulation affects hiring costs and worker bargaining power. We show that monetary policy is less effective under tight regulations: monetary policy shocks have a smaller effect on inflation, compared to a situation with lower hiring costs or lower entry costs.

Keywords

Monetary Policy Real Exchange Rate Informal Sector Formal Sector Entry Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Achyuta, A., Chari, A.V., & Siddharth, S. (2013). Firing costs and flexibility: Evidence from firms’ employment responses to shocks in India. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 725–740.Google Scholar
  2. Anand, R., & Khera, P. (2016). Macroeconomic impact of product and labor market reforms on informality and unemployment in India. IMF Working Paper, WP/16/47. International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  3. Anand, R., Prasad, E., & Zhang, B. (2015). What measure of inflation should a developing country central bank target? Journal of Monetary Economics, 74, 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilbiie, F., Ghironi, F., & Melitz, M. J. (2012). Endogenous entry, product variety, and business cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 120(2), 304–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, O., & Gali, J. (2006). A new keynesian model with unemployment. National Bank of Belgium Working Paper, No. 92, October 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchard, O., & Giavazzi, F. (2003). Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 188(3), 879–907.Google Scholar
  7. Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. (2000). Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end? In J. Taylor & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of macroeconomics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  8. Das, S. (2015). Monetary policy in India: Transmission to bank interest rates. IMF Working Paper No.15/129.Google Scholar
  9. Dixit, A.K., & Stiglitz, J. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. The American Economic Review, 67, 297–308.Google Scholar
  10. Dougherty, S. (2009). Labour regulation and employment dynamics at the state level in India. Review of Market Integration, 1(3), 295–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gali, J. (2008, March 2). Monetary policy, inflation, and the business cycle: An introduction to the New Keynesian framework and its applications. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ito, T. (2013). We are All FIT-ers Now: Is flexible inflation targeting fit to a new financial environment? In Bank of Thailand and IMF Conference, 1–2 November.Google Scholar
  13. Kanbur, R. (2014). Informality: Causes, consequences, and policy reponses. In H. Charles (Ed.), Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Working Paper. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  14. Mishra, P., & Montiel, P. (2012, June). How effective is monetary transmission in developing countries? A survey of the empirical evidence. IMF Working Paper No.12/143.Google Scholar
  15. Mishra, P., Montiel, P., Pedroni, P., & Spilimbergo, A. (2014, July). Monetary policy and bank lending rates in low-income countries: Heterogeneous panel estimates. Journal of Development Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  16. Mohan, R. (2008). Monetary policy transmission in India. In Transmission mechanisms for monetary policy in emerging market economies (Vol. 35, pp. 259–307). Bank for International Settlements 2008.Google Scholar
  17. Mohanty, D. (2012, May). Evidence of interest rate channel of monetary policy transmission in India. RBI Working Paper No 6.Google Scholar
  18. NCEUS. (2009). The challenge of employment in India, an informal economy perspective: Main Report (Vol. I). http://nceuis.nic.in/The_Challenge_of_Employment_in_India.pdf.
  19. OECD. (2014). Reducing regulatory barriers to competition: Progress since 2008 and scope for further reform, Chapter 2. In Economic policy reforms 2014—going for growth Interim Report.Google Scholar
  20. Reserve Bank of India. (2014, January 21). Report of the expert committee to revise and strengthen the monetary policy framework (Patel Committee Report).Google Scholar
  21. Reserve Bank of India. (2014, January 21). Addressing impediments to transmission of monetary policy, Chapter 4. In Report of the expert committee to revise and strengthen the monetary policy framework.Google Scholar
  22. Rotemberg, J. (1982). Sticky prices in the Unites States. Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), 1187–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sengupta, N. (2014). Changes in transmission channels of monetary policy in India. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(49), 62–71.Google Scholar
  24. Singh, B. (2011). How asymmetric is the monetary policy transmission to financial markets in India? RBI Occasional Papers (Vol. 32/2).Google Scholar
  25. World Bank. (2016). Doing Business 2016: Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google Scholar
  26. World Economic Forum. (2014). The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–15, Full Data Edition. Basel: World Economic Forum (WEF).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMFWashington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations