Abstract
This paper evaluates developments in India’s nominal and real exchange rates over the past two decades, describing longer term trends as well as short-term movements and volatility. In addition, we evaluate the motivation and impact of exchange rate policy in India, including its interaction with domestic monetary policy. We find substantial divergences between nominal and real exchange rate trends, and between Indian multilateral and bilateral Rupee-USD longer-term exchange rate movements. Beyond long-term trends, Rupee exchange rate movements and volatility have evolved through several distinct episodes. In particular, exchange rate volatility increased markedly from the mid-2000s, especially since the Global Financial Crisis. The RBI used foreign exchange market intervention and an active capital control policy to influence the level and limit volatility of the exchange rate, an official policy objective. However, these policies have had limited effect on the exchange rate. Against a background of a trend increase in financial openness and, perhaps most importantly, increasing external shocks, the RBI appears to have accepted more instability in the exchange rate in favor of greater monetary independence. Since the GFC , however, greater monetary independence seems to have focused more on stimulating growth and employment rather than low inflation. Only since 2014 has the RBI focused on low inflation as a primary domestic objective.
We would like to thank Bryce Shelton for excellent research assistance, and Rose Cunningham, Mark Kruger, and Errol D’Souza for helpful comments. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors. No responsibility for them should be attributed to the Bank of Canada.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Source: Reserve Bank of India, Database on the India economy. The numbers cited are the sum of merchant and interbank purchases and monthly averages of daily data.
- 2.
See for example, Khan (2011) which notes “Excessive volatility in exchange rate is a potential source of macroeconomic instability, and accordingly, the RBI aims at containing volatility to ensure a stable macroeconomic environment.”.
- 3.
Quotation from RBI website: https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/FS_Overview.aspx?fn=5.
- 4.
That is to say that the exchange rate enters into the RBI’s policymaking not only due to its impact on inflation but also its potential impact on economic growth directly and on financial stability. In countries where central bank targets inflation (since 2015 for the RBI) and the central bank credibility is high, exchange rate pass-through to inflation is typically low. Many advanced economies have seen the exchange rate pass-through decline over time (BIS, 2005), and central banks worry about exchange rate movements mainly to the extent that they affect current or expected inflation.
- 5.
See appendix A for data sources and descriptions.
- 6.
For example, page 15 of RBI’s (2014) Annual report states that RBI’s response to the developments following the US Fed’s indication that it would taper its large-scale asset purchase program “aimed at containing exchange rate volatility, compressing the current account deficit (CAD) and rebuilding buffers.”.
- 7.
FEMA 1999 was passed to replace the Foreign exchange Regulation Act, (FERA) 1973 (later amended as FERA 1993). FERA 1973 was a draconian law that made violation of foreign exchange regulations a criminal offense and presumed guilty until proven innocent. In addition to reversing these provisions of the FERA and other liberalizations, the FEMA 1999 also made the rupee convertible on the current account. However, the RBI and the Government of India continued to have the power to regulate transactions on both current and capital account and the market for foreign exchange. The full text of the act is available here: http://finmin.nic.in/the_ministry/dept_eco_affairs/capital_market_div/FEMA_act_1999.pdf.
- 8.
The reports are not always consistent in the views expressed about the merits of exchange rate flexibility, however.
- 9.
See Reserve Bank of India (2013).
- 10.
See RBI announcement at: https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=9788.
- 11.
The de-jure liberalization resulted in de facto liberalization, as measured by deviations from covered interest parity. Hutchison et al. (2012b) use a self-Exciting Threshold Auto-Regressive (SETAR) model to the interest differentials between the onshore interbank rate and offshore-NDF implied (covered) yield over the period 1998–2011 and find that prior to 2008, capital control tightenings were able to create a wedge between the offshore and onshore interest rates, but only in periods in which the controls were actively tightened (March 2003–August 2005 and August 2006–October 2008). They also find that post-2008, the no-arbitrage band for the differentials fell to close to zero.
- 12.
The FOMC press conference in June further reiterated that the asset purchases could slow in the fall of 2013, conditional on the economic recovery continuing to take hold.
- 13.
We use IFS data on money market interest rates, where available, and monthly average of interest rates. For the US, this series is the federal funds rate. For India, the IFS series on money market rates is missing between June 1998 and April 2006. For this period, we use the MIBOR data from Haver’s EMERGE database.
- 14.
Exchange rate data is the monthly average nominal spot exchange rate against the USD series from IMF IFS. International investment position data is also from IMF IIP statistics.
- 15.
The monetary policy autonomy index is based on money market interest rates, rather than actual policy rates. The RBI was reducing interest rate and cash reserve ratios over the period 1999–2004. However, sterilized intervention increased the supply of domestic bonds held by the public, which may have prevented full transmission to market interest rates. Real rates also did not decline in this period as inflation was low (fiscal policy was contractionary, with declining fiscal deficit). The index therefore seems to capture well the declining monetary policy autonomy over the period of sterilized intervention.
- 16.
Whether the focus on exchange rate made monetary policy is less effective is a question we do not address here.
- 17.
Note that real interest rates (measured ex-post using CPI inflation) remained negative throughout this period.
- 18.
RBI was also concerned during this period with exchange rate pass-through to inflation, as the exchange rate had started depreciating in 2011.
References
Aizenman, J., Chinn, M., & Ito, H. (2008). Assessing the emerging global financial architecture: measuring the trilemma’s configurations over time, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14533.
Hutchison, M., Pasricha, G., & Singh, N. (2012a). Effectiveness of capital controls in india: evidence from offshore NDF market. IMF Economic Review, 60(3), 395–438.
Hutchison, M., Pasricha, G., & Singh, N. (2012b). Indian capital control liberalization: estimates from NDF markets. IMF Economic Review, 60(3), 395–438.
Hutchison, M., Sengupta, R., & Singh, N. (2012b). India’s trilemma: financial liberalization, exchange rates and monetary policy. The World Economy, 35(1), 3–18. January.
Hutchison, M., Sengupta, R., & Singh, N. (2013). Dove or Hawk: characterizing monetary policy regime switches in india. Emerging Markets Review, 16, 183–202.
India IMF Article IV Consultation (2013). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2013/cr1337.pdf.
India IMF Article IV Consultation (2015). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2015/cr1561.pdf.
Khan, H.R. (2011). The shrinking money and Reserve Bank of India’s monetary policy. Speech at the 10th National Management Seminar—2011 on The shrinking money: combating debt crisis and inflation, organized by The Asian School of Business Management, Bhubaneswar, 10 December 2011.
Lane, P. R., & Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2007). The external wealth of nations mark II: Revised and extended estimates of foreign assets and liabilities, 1970–2004. Journal of International Economics, 73, 223–250. November.
MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601–618. November–December. Wiley.
Pandey, R., Pasricha, G.K., Patnaik, I., & Shah, A. (2015). Motivations for capital controls and their effectiveness, Working Paper 2015-5.
Pasricha, G.K., Falagiarda, M., Bijsterbosch, M., & Aizenman, J. (2015). Domestic and multilateral effects of capital controls in emerging markets, (with Matteo Falagiarda, Martin Bijsterbosch and Joshua Aizenman), NBER Working Paper No. 20822, January 2015.
Reserve Bank of India (2013). Intervention in the Foreign Exchange Markets: the approach of the reserve bank of India, remarks prepared for Emerging Markets Deputy Governors‘ Meeting, hosted by the BIS. http://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap73l.pdf.
Reserve Bank of India (2014). RBI Bulletin, April 2014. https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Bulletin/PDFs/00BA100414FL.pdf.
Sahay, R., Arora, V., Arvanitis, T., Faruqee, H., N’Diaye, P., Mancini-Griffoli, T. & an IMF Team (2014). Emerging market volatility: lessons from the taper tantrum. IMF staff discussion note, SDN/14/09, September 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Data Sources
Appendix: Data Sources
Series | Source | Notes |
---|---|---|
Indian Rupee vis-à-vis US$ | Bloomberg | Spot exchange rate |
Nominal effective exchange rate—36-currency index (NEER36) | Reserve Bank of India | Index: 2004–2005 (April–March) = 100; Trade-based weights. Current series begins. Data prior to July 2005 spliced from the discontinued NEER series with earlier base year |
Real Indian Rupee vis-à-vis US$ | Bloomberg | Index: January 2001 = 100; spot exchange rate normalized by the authors to an index |
Real effective exchange rate—36-currency index (REER36) | Reserve Bank of India | Index: 2004–2005 (April–March) = 100; Trade-based weights. Current series begins. Data prior to April 2004 spliced from the discontinued NEER series with earlier base year |
Real price differential between India and trade-weighted 36 index (RP36) | Construction by authors | Index: January 2001 = 100. RP36 = NEER36/REER36 |
Real price differential between India and US$ | Construction by the authors | India CPI/US CPI |
Spot intervention | Reserve Bank of India | |
Forward intervention | Reserve Bank of India | Forward intervention series is a net amount outstanding. We take month-over-month level change to show intervention |
Capital control liberalization indices (inflow and outflow liberalizations, including and excluding FDI) | Pasricha et al. (2015) | Weighted number of capital control actions, cumulated over time. Noncumulated, weighted data from source |
Monetary independence Index | IMF IFS and Haver | Constructed by the authors using methodology in Aizenman et al. (2008). This measures the correlations between nominal short-term money market interest rates in India and the USA. Higher numbers indicate lower correlations, i.e., higher monetary policy autonomy. IFS data is used except for India between June 1998 and April 2006 (when the IFS series is missing). For this period, MIBOR data from Haver is used |
Exchange rate stability Index | IMF IFS | Constructed by the authors using methodology in Aizenman et al. (2008). This measure is the normalized annual standard deviation of the monthly percentage changes in nominal INR/USD spot exchange rate |
Capital account openness Index | Lane and Milesi-Ferretti (2007) | Total foreign assets and liabilities, as percentage of nominal GDP. Both measured in US Dollars |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hutchison, M.M., Pasricha, G.K. (2016). Exchange Rate Trends and Management in India. In: Ghate, C., Kletzer, K. (eds) Monetary Policy in India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2840-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2840-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2838-7
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2840-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)