Abstract
In developing countries where numerous factors such as rapid population growth and entrenched social problems hinder equitable economic growth and education, research and development (R&D) are often neglected as well. But the importance of R&D extends beyond science. The capacity to generate and advance their scientific scholarship is important for all countries – for such independent scientific thinking skills might also empower the citizens’ capacity and will to think democratically in a global interdependent world. Social innovation is explained here as a form of responsible innovation that brings together funders, scientists, and knowledge user communities to address long-standing and/or entrenched societal problems. Moreover, in social innovation, the user communities such as citizens can also contribute to the scientific design and funding beyond a passive role to merely adopt innovations developed by scientific experts. The overall success of developing nations thus rests on building successful linkages of the education ecosystem with social innovation and bioeconomy. To this end, E-learning endeavors and the virtual biotechnology labs are novel initiatives that are rapidly transforming society in the developing world. Distance education and E-learning and open learning endeavors are certainly advantageous for the resource-limited developing countries, where the numbers of potential learners are much higher than the number of well-experienced teachers and educational institutes capable of providing the required infrastructures for basic and advanced scientific education. India, in particular, has had strikingly innovative and forward-looking investments in biotechnology distributed learning practices that can illuminate the global society of scientists and citizens. In this chapter we will highlight the fundamental need and present scenario of virtual laboratories in advanced sophisticated life science education in the developing world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen IE, Seaman J (2010) Class differences: online education in the United States, Newburyport. Sloan Consortium (2010), ERIC Number: ED529952, 1–30, Available from: sloanconsortium.org
Clinton HR (2010) Foreign Aff 89:13
Diwakar S, Achuthan K, Nedungadi P et al (2011) Enhanced facilitation of biotechnology education in developing nations via virtual labs: analysis, implementation and case-studies. Int J Comput Theory Eng 3:1793–8201. doi:10.7763/ijcte.2011.v3.275, Available from: www.ijcte.org
Diwakar S, Achuthan K, Nedungadi P et al (2012) Biotechnology virtual labs: facilitating laboratory access anytime-anywhere for classroom education. In: Innovations in biotechnology. Academic Press, New York, pp 379–398. ISBN: 978-953-51-0096-6, InTech. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/innovations-in-biotechnology/biotechnology-virtual-labs-facilitatinglaboratory-access-anytime-anywhere-for-classroom-education
Diwakar S, Radhamani R, Sasidharakurup H et al (2014a) Usage and diffusion of biotechnology virtual labs for enhancing University education in India’s urban and rural areas. In: E-learning as a socio-cultural system: a multidimensional analysis. Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp 63–83. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6154-7
Diwakar S, Parasuram H, Medini C et al (2014b) Complementing neurophysiology education for developing countries via cost-effective virtual labs: case studies and classroom scenarios. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ 12:A130–A139
European Commission, Europe (2011) EU-Wide Targets, 2020. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/targets/eu-targets/index_en.htm
Flowers OL (2011) Investigating the effectiveness of virtual laboratories in an undergraduate biology course. J Hum Resour Adult Learn 7:110–116, ISBN: 18172105
Huang C (2004) Virtual labs: E-learning for tomorrow. PLoS Biol 2:e157
Nair B, Krishnan R, Nizar N et al (2012) Role of ICT-enabled visualization-oriented virtual laboratories in universities for enhancing biotechnology education – VALUE initiative: case study and impacts. FormaMente 7:209–229, ISBN: 1970-7118
National Science Foundation, Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure (ACCI) Task Force Reports, in 2014.
Nilsson T (2003) Virtual laboratories in the life sciences. A new blueprint for reorganizing research at the European level. EMBO Rep 4:914–916
Normile D (2001) Online science is a stretch for Asia. Science 293:1623
Özdemir V (2013) OMICS 2.0: a practice turn for 21(st) century science and society. OMICS 17:1–4. doi:10.1089/omi.2012.0111
Porcello D, Hsi S (2013) Science education. Crowdsourcing and curating online education resources. Science 341:240–241. doi:10.1126/science.1234722
Radhamani R, Sasidharakurup H, Kumar D et al (2014a) Explicit interactions by users form a critical element in virtual labs aiding enhanced education - a case study from biotechnology virtual labs. In: IEEE T4E. doi: 10.1109/T4E.2014.37
Radhamani R, Sasidharakurup H, Sujatha G et al (2014b) Virtual labs improve student’s performance in a classroom. eLEOT. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13293-8_17
Ray S, Koshy NR, Diwakar S et al (2012a) Sakshat Labs: India’s virtual proteomics initiative. PLoS Biol 10:e1001353. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001353
Ray S, Koshy NR, Reddy PJ, Srivastava S (2012b) Virtual Labs in proteomics: new E-learning tools. J Proteomics 75:2515–2525. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2012.03.014
Reddy PJ, Jain R, Paik YK et al (2011) Personalized medicine in the Age of pharmacoproteomics: a close up on India and need for social science engagement for responsible innovation in post-proteomic biology. Curr Pharmacogenomics Pers Med 9:67–75
Srivastava S, Özdemir V, Ray S et al (2013) Online education: E-learning booster in developing world. Nature 501:316. doi:10.1038/501316c
Swan K (2003) Learning effectiveness online: what the research tells us. Elem Qual online Educ 13–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00519.x. Available from: cguevara.commons.gc.cuny.edu
Waldrop MM (2013) Online learning: campus 2.0. Nature 495:160–163. doi:10.1038/495160a
Yearley S (2009) The ethical landscape: identifying the right way to think about the ethical and societal aspects of synthetic biology research and products. J R Soc Interface 6(Suppl 4):S559–S564. doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0055
Acknowledgements
The financial support from the Sakshat project of National Mission on Education through ICT, Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), for the establishment of Virtual Proteomics Laboratory 10MHRD005 and Clinical Proteomics Remote Triggering Virtual Laboratory 11MHRD005 is gratefully acknowledged. We thank the Chancellor of Amrita University, Sri Mata Amritanandamayi Devi, for invaluable discussions and insights on India’s E-learning initiatives and the growing role for public engagement in understanding technology future(s).
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ray, S., Srivastava, S., Diwakar, S., Nair, B., Özdemir, V. (2016). Delivering on the Promise of Bioeconomy in the Developing World: Link It with Social Innovation and Education. In: Srivastava, S. (eds) Biomarker Discovery in the Developing World: Dissecting the Pipeline for Meeting the Challenges. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2837-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2837-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2835-6
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2837-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)