Abstract
Normal endothelial cell function is imperative for maintaining the corneal transparency. Various endothelial keratoplasty techniques have evolved over the last 2 decades and have shown to aid in the provision of potential vision by endothelial transplantation [1–4]. Although major complications of penetrating keratoplasties like suture inflammation, irregular astigmatism, and keratitis are prevented after endothelial keratoplasties, they are not free of complications [5]. In this chapter, we have discussed the complications of Pre-Descemet’s endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) and the methods of management of the same. Pre-Descemet’s endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK), a recent modification of endothelial keratoplasty, involves the transplantation of the pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer) along with the Descemet’s membrane (DM) with endothelium [6, 7]. PDEK has many potential advantages over other EKs such as Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet’s stripping and endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK); however, in the learning curve, complications are inevitable. These complications are generally manageable, and the risk tends to decline as a surgeon gains experience in the new surgical technique.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dirisamer M, van Dijk K, Dapena I, et al. Prevention and management of graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(3):280–91.
Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, et al. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):2368–73.
Shih CY, Ritterband DC, Rubino S, Palmiero PM, Jangi A, Liebmann J, et al. Visually significant and nonsignificant complications arising from Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(6):837–43.
Suh LH, Yoo SH, Deobhakta A, Donaldson KE, Alfonso EC, Culbertson WW, et al. Complications of Descemet’s stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at One Institute. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1517–24.
Nanavaty MA, Wang X, Shortt AJ. Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(2):CD008420. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008420.pub3.
Agarwal A, Dua HS, Narang P, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Jacob S, Agarwal A, Gupta A. Pre-Descemet’s endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK). Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(9):1181–5.
Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, Gray T, Lowe J. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology. 2013;120(9):1778–85.
Kumar DA, Dua HS, Agarwal A, Jacob S. Postoperative spectral-domain optical coherence tomography evaluation of pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) grafts. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(7):1535–6.
Yeh RY, Quilendrino R, Musa FU, Liarakos VS, Dapena I, Melles GR. Predictive value of optical coherence tomography in graft attachment after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(2):240–5.
Anshu A, Price MO, Price Jr FW. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(3):536–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agarwal, A., Kumar, D.A. (2016). Complications of Pre-Descemet’s Endothelial Keratoplasty (PDEK). In: Jacob, S. (eds) Mastering Endothelial Keratoplasty . Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2821-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2821-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2819-6
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2821-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)