Abstract
This paper analyzes the effects of corruption on trade flows for a panel of nations. The novelty of the paper lies in our focus on trade flows at the industry level. Such a focus is important because the emerging literature on trade and institutions suggests that the pattern of comparative advantage between nations may be driven by international differences in institutions, among other factors. We find that exports of certain goods by the developed nations are negatively affected by higher domestic corruption in these nations. Interestingly, corruption in the trading partner also reduces exports of certain goods. Imports seem somewhat less vulnerable to corruption. The analysis uncovers considerable heterogeneity in the effects of corruption on different industries.
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent official positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For the tobacco industry, bilateral trade data have been reported for 87 exporting countries and 91 importing countries.
- 2.
The effects of the time-invariant variables on bilateral imports in the random effects model are found to be exactly similar to that for bilateral exports. Imports are found to be positively associated with sharing a common border, having a common colonial heritage, and sharing a common language, while negatively associated with distance between the trading partners. The results can be obtained from the authors on request.
References
Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity model. Am Econ Rev 69:106–116
Anderson JE, Marcouiller D (2002) Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84:342–352
Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93:170–192
Belloc M (2006) Institutions and international trade: a reconsideration of comparative advantage. J Econ Surveys 20:3–26
Bergstrand J (1985) The gravity equation in international trade, some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67:474–481
Bergstrand J (1989) The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 71:143–153
Berkowitz D, Moenius J, Pistor K (2006) Trade, law, and product complexity. Rev Econ Stat 88:363–373
Deardorff A (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: Frankel J (ed) The Regionalization of the World Economy. University of Chicago Press
de Groot H, Linders GM, Rietveld P, Subramanian U (2004) The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos 57:103–123
Feenstra RC, Markusen JR, Rose AK (2001) Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Can J Econ 34:430–447
Francois J, Manchin M (2013) Institutions, infrastructure, and trade. World Dev 46:165–175
Head K, Mayer T, Ries J (2010) The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. J Int Econ 81:1–14
Helpman E, Krugman P (1985) Market structure and foreign trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Krugman P (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70:950–959
Levchenko AA (2007) Institutional quality and international trade. Rev Econ Stud 74:791–819
Marjit S, Mandal B, Roy S (2014) Trade openness, corruption and factor abundance: evidence from a dynamic panel. Rev Dev Econ 18:45–58
Markusen JR, Venables AJ (2000) The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multi-national trade. J Int Econ 52:209–234
Markusen JR (2013) Putting per-capita income back into trade theory. J Int Econ 90:255–265
Mohlmann LJ, Ederveen S, de Groot H, Linders GM (2010) Intangible barriers to trade: a sectoral approach. In: van Bergeijk PAG, Brakman S (eds) The gravity model in international trade: advances and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 224–251
Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross sectional data. Econometrica 56:69–86
Nicita A, Olarreaga M (2006) Trade, production and protection 1976–2004. World Bank Econ Rev 21:165–171
Nunn N (2007) Relationship-specificity, incomplete contracts, and the pattern of trade. Quart J Econ 122:569–600
Nunn N, Trefler D (2014) Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. In: Gopinath G, Helpman E, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of international economics, vol 4, North Holland, pp 263–315
Ranjan P, Lee JY (2007) Contract enforcement and international trade. Econ Politics 19:191–218
Rauch J (1999) Networks versus markets in international trade. J Int Econ 48:7–35
Trefler D (1995) The case of the missing trade and other mysteries. Am Econ Rev 85:1029–1046
van Bergeijk PAG, Brakman S (2010) The gravity model in international trade: advances and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
List of countries used in the fixed effect regressions:
Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Bolivia, Brazil, Botswana, Canada, Chile, China, Cameroon, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Honduras, Hungary, Indonesia, India, Ireland, Iran, Iceland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jordan, Japan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lithuania, Latvia, Morocco, Moldova, Mexico, Malta, Mongolia, Mozambique, Malawi, Malaysia, Nigeria, Netherlands, Norway, New Zealand, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Senegal, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Tanzania, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Uruguay, United States, Venezuela, Yemen.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bandyopadhyay, S., Roy, S. (2016). The Effects of Corruption on Trade Flows: A Disaggregated Analysis. In: Roy, M., Sinha Roy, S. (eds) International Trade and International Finance. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2797-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2797-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2795-3
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2797-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)