Abstract
Having collected the data from qualitative and quantitative methods, the same have been collated to give an exhaustive account of the odyssey of Knowledge Management in POWERGRID from vision to evaluation. The journey of Knowledge Management in this Company used a variety of tools for its implementation and capitalization. The demographic descriptions coupled with measurement, reliability and validity of major constructs are the salient features of this chapter. Confirmatory factor analysis through structural equation modelling is the focus of this part of the book. The significance of hypothesized model after hypothesis testing and the model fit of measurement model through confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS 20-two models are the outcomes of the interpretation of data and their collation. Finally, the qualitative and quantitative data have been integrated to draw inferences which indicate that POWERGRID has got proper mechanism in place and succeeded in Knowledge Management from acquisition/creation, sharing, use, reuse of knowledge to its capitalization as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albaum, G.: The Likert scale revisited: an alternate version. J. Market Res. Soc. 39, 331–349 (1997)
Andy, F.: Discovering Statistics using SPSS, 3rd edn. Sage Publication, Washington DC (2009)
Bentler, P.M., Bonnet, D.C.: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88(3), 588–606 (1980)
Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S.: Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1993)
Brown, M.W., Cudeck, R.: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (eds.) Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1993)
Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A.: Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA (1979)
Coombs, C.H.: A theory of data. Psychol. Rev. 67, 143–159 (1960)
Diamantopoulos, A., Siguaw, J., Siguaw, J.A.: Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated. Sage Publications, London (2000)
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981). doi:10.2307/3151312
Garson, G.D.: Structural equation modeling. http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/structur.htm. Accessed 10 May 2011
Hair, Jr. J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Pearson-Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2006)
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Balin, B.J., Anderson, R.E.: Multivariate data analysis. Maxwell Macmillan International Editions, New York (2010)
Hodge, D.R., Gillespie, D.: Phrase completions: an alternative to Likert scales. Soc. Work Res. 27, 45–55 (2003)
Hoyle, R.H. (ed.): Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (1995)
Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Eqn. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999)
Hutcheson, G.D., Sofroniou, N.: The multivariate social scientist. In: Factor Analysis, pp. 224–225. Sage, London (1999)
Jakobsson, U.: Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 18, 437–440 (2004)
Jamieson, S.: Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med. Educ. 38, 1212–1218 (2004)
João, M.: Google scholar accessed on 16th November by using structural equation modeling for ordinal data. Board of Directors of IAVE, I.P. and Associate Professor of Statistics at ISPA-IU (2014)
Joreskog, K.G., Sorbom, D.: LISREL User's Guide. National Educational Services, Chicago (1981)
Knapp, T.R.: Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy. Nurs. Res. 39, 121–123 (1990)
Kuzon Jr, W.M., Urbanchek, M.G., McCabe, S.: The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Ann. Plast. Surg. 37, 265–272 (1996)
Mallard, A.G.C., Lance, C.E.: Development and evaluation of a parent–employee interrole conflict scale. Soc. Ind. Res. 45, 537 (1998)
Michael, N.: Google scholar accessed on 16th November by using structural equation modeling for ordinal data Professor at Virginia Commonwealth University) (2014)
Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., Stilwell, C.D.: Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psycho-logical Bull. 105, 430–445 (1989)
Niehoff, B.P., Moorman, R.H.: Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 36, 527–556 (1993)
POWERGRID: Knowledge Management Policy. POWERGRID (2010)
POWERGRID: Knowledge Maps and Matrices. POWERGRID (2011a)
POWERGRID: Learner’s Planner 2011-2012. POWERGRID (2011b)
POWERGRID: HRD Learner’s Planner 2012-2013. POWERGRID (2012)
POWERGRID: HRD Learner’s Planner 2013-2014. POWERGRID (2013)
POWERGRID: POWERGRID HRD Plan. POWERGRID (2014a)
POWERGRID: Annual Diary (2014b)
Steiger, J.H., Lind, J.C.: Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. (1980)
Tucker, L.R., Lewis, C.: The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38, 1–10 (1973)
Van Dalen, D.B.: Understanding Educational Research: An Introduction. McGraw-Hill (1973)
Vigderhous, G.: The level of measurement and ‘permissible’ statistical analysis in social research. Pacific Sociol. Rev. 20(1), 61–72 (1977)
Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D.F., Summers, G.F.: Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In: Heise, D.R. (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1977, pp. 84–136. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (1977)
Wiersma, W.: Research Methods in Education: An Introduction. Allyn and Bacon (2000)
Winer, B.J., Brown, D.R., Michels, K.M.: Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 3rd edn. McGraw–Hill, New York (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pandey, K.N. (2016). Data Collection, Analysis and Interpretation. In: Paradigms of Knowledge Management. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 60. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2785-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2785-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2783-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2785-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)