Integrated Drainage Solutions for Waterlogged Saline Lands

  • S. K. Gupta


The anticipated increase in crop yields from irrigated lands has remained subdued due to widespread increase in waterlogging and soil salinity. Drainage, a technical intervention to manage waterlogging and soil salinity, has been generally known, and a number of techniques have been perfected and applied to solve the twin problems. However, drainage application has not kept pace with the increasing requirement. It is estimated that about 10–15 million ha area requires drainage improvements including 2–3 million ha area requiring subsurface pipe drains in the near future. This chapter reviews and collates the adverse impacts of waterlogging and soil salinity on land productivity, traces the history of land drainage and advocates shift from either this or that option approach to an integrated drainage approach so as to take advantage of the synergy of two or more drainage methods. It is brought out that any subsurface drainage technique in monsoon climatic conditions will not be effective unless integrated with surface drainage. It has been observed that at most places integrated drainage systems have been in operation, but the role of only one or the other is highlighted resulting in a skewed viewpoint on drainage technologies. For example, many horizontal pipe drainage schemes in India have been implemented in areas already having surface drainage and/or bio-interceptor drainage. In such cases, the role of only subsurface drainage is highlighted because it happens to be the new addition to the existing systems. In a similar way, the role of vertical drainage system is often underestimated at least in the initial years. A case has been made out for strong research inputs on integrated subsurface pipe, mole, vertical and biodrainage systems. The research outputs must help to translate hypothetical calculations of biodrainage potential and designs into thumb rules for easy applications as well as its integration potential with other techniques to take care of salt balance. Several options of integrated drainage systems have been presented. While either integrated or individual systems can be adopted at micro-scale, only an integrated plan would be a technically sound and cost-effective solution at macro-scale as illustrated by the drainage master plan of Haryana (India). Overall, the chapter challenges the conventional thinking that a drainage technique can replace another drainage technique in favour of complementary approach. It is suggested that an effective governance mechanism should be in place to manage land drainage as in the case of irrigation systems, since land drainage is a specialized activity requiring technical skills and equipment. However, the governing institution in this case needs to be multidisciplinary to ensure that every drop of water is used to fulfil the water requirement of the region before it is drained to the natural river system.


Soil Salinity Drainage System Surface Drainage Subsurface Drainage Shallow Water Table 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amer MH, de Ridder NA (eds) (1989) Land drainage in Egypt. Drainage Research Institute, Cairo. 377 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1998) Management of water logging and salinity problems in Haryana: master plan. Expert committee constituted by Government of Haryana, ChandigarhGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2002) Recommendations on water logging and salinity control based on pilot area drainage research. CSSRI, Karnal and ALTERRA-ILRI, Wageningen, 100 pGoogle Scholar
  4. Arshad M, Ahmad N, Usman M (2009) Simulating seepage from branch canal under crop, land and water relationships. Int J Agric Biol 11:529–534Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya AK (2007) Integrated water management drainage, Report of ES Scheme. Division of Agricultural Education. ICAR, New Delhi. 51 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhutta MN, Chaudhry MR (2000) Biological control of waterlogging. In: Proceedings Eighth ICID international drainage workshop, New Delhi, India, vol IV, Group V: 33–45Google Scholar
  7. Brown LC, Zucker LA (1998) Agricultural drainage, water quality impacts and subsurface drainage studies in the Midwest. The Ohio State University extension bulletin 871, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Chhabra R, Thakur NP (1998a) Bio-drainage using trees to control water logging and secondary salinization in canal irrigated areas. Proceedings National Conference on Salinity Management in Agriculture. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, KarnalGoogle Scholar
  9. Chhabra R, Thakur NP (1998b) Lysimeter study on the use of bio-drainage to control water logging and secondary salinization in (canal) irrigated arid/semi-arid environment. Irrig Drain Syst 12:265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CSSRI (1997) Vision-2020. CSSRI perspective plan. Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal. 95 pGoogle Scholar
  11. Dagar JC (2011) Bio-drainage for amelioration of water logging. In: Dey P, Gupta SK (eds) Management for sustainable agriculture in canal command. CADA, Haryana and CSSRI, Karnal, pp 54–58Google Scholar
  12. Dagar JC (2014) Greening salty and waterlogged lands through agroforestry systems. In: Dagar JC, Singh AK, Arunachalam A (eds) Agroforestry systems in India: livelihood security & environmental services-advances in agroforestry, vol 10. Springer Publishers, India, pp 333–344Google Scholar
  13. Dandekar CB, Chougule BA (2010) Drainage of irrigated lands. In: Proceedings of the 9th international drainage symposium, CIGR and CSBE, 13–16 June, 2010, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  14. Datta KK, De Jong C (2002) Adverse effect of waterlogging and soil salinity on crop and land productivity in northwest region of Haryana, India. Agric Water Manag 57(3):223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denecke HW (2000) Concept note on bio-drainage and bio-disposal systems. Available on
  16. ERS (1981) Farm drainage in the United States, history, status, and prospects, ERS miscellaneous publication 1455. Economic Research Service (ERS), USDA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. FAI (2002) Fertilizers statistics. Fertilizer Association of India (FAI), New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO (1977) Irrigation canal lining (D.B. Kraatz), FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 2. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghassemi F, Jakeman AJ, Nix HA (1995) Salinization of land and water resources. Human causes, extent, management and case studies. Center for Resources and Environmental Studies, The Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta SK (1985) Subsurface drainage for waterlogged saline soils. Irrig Power J 42:335–344Google Scholar
  21. Gupta SK (1997) Integrated drainage system for sustainable irrigated agriculture. In: Varma CVJ, Rao ARG, Kaushish SP (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on water and energy, vol 2, Water resources. Central Board of Irrigation and Power, New Delhi, pp 158–165Google Scholar
  22. Gupta SK (2002a) Future prospects of subsurface drainage in India. J Water Manage 10:49–57Google Scholar
  23. Gupta SK (2002b) A century of subsurface drainage research in India. Irrig Drain Syst 16:69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta SK (2003) A historical perspective of subsurface drainage research in India. Asian Agri-Hist 7(1):45–54Google Scholar
  25. Gupta SK (2005) A critical analysis of bio-drainage with special reference to Indian experiences. Souvenir: all India seminar reclamation of waterlogged saline soils through drainage. Institution of Engineers (Kota Chapter), Kota, pp 81–96Google Scholar
  26. Gupta SK (2011) Case studies on subsurface drainage systems and guidelines for design and evaluation. In: Dey P, Gupta SK (eds) Salinity management for sustainable agriculture in canal commands. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, pp 11–22Google Scholar
  27. Gupta SK (ed) (2014) Agricultural land drainage in India. Agrotech Publishing Academy, Udaipur, 316pGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta SK, Gupta IC (1997) Crop production in saline soils. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, 239 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Gupta SK, Satyanarayana TV, Manjunatha MV, Kuligod VB (2004a) Subsurface drainage to increase rice productivity in saline environment. Int Rice Res Notes 29:91–93Google Scholar
  30. Gupta SK, Sharma DP, Swarup A (2004b) Relative tolerance of crops to surface stagnation. J Agril Eng 41:44–48Google Scholar
  31. Heuperman AF (1999) Hydraulic gradient reversal by trees in shallow water table areas and repercussions for the sustainability of tree growing systems. J Agric Water Manag 39:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopkins D, Colac (2002) Managing wet soils: mole drainage. Agricultural notes AG0949
  33. IID (2014) IID’s inadvertent overrun payback certification report. Imperial Irrigation District, Imperial. Google Scholar
  34. Irwin RW (1981) On-farm drainage benefit, Final report for the Corrugated Plastic Drainage Tubing Association. University of Guelph, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  35. Jeet-Ram, Dagar JC, Lal K, Singh G, Toky OP, Tanwar RS, Dar SR, Mukesh K (2011) Biodrainage to combat water logging, increase farm productivity and sequester carbon in canal command area of north-west India. Curr Sci 100(11):1673–1680Google Scholar
  36. Jha MK, Koga K (1995) Mole drainage: prospective drainage solution to Bangkok clay soils. Agric Water Manag 28(3):253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jha MK, Koga K (2002) Design and practice of pipe less drainage systems: a review. Int Agric Eng J 11(2 & 3):59–91Google Scholar
  38. Joshi PK (1994) Socio-economic impacts of managing salt affected soils. In: Rao et al (eds) Salinity management for sustainable agriculture. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, pp 282–293Google Scholar
  39. Joshi PK, Agnihotri AK (1984) An assessment of adverse effects of canal irrigation in India. Indian J Agric Econ 38:528–536Google Scholar
  40. Kandiah A, Denecke H (2001) ADPHT-Asia drainage program for the humid tropics. IPTRID Network Magazine GRID, Issue 17 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  41. Kapoor AS (2000) Bio-drainage feasibility and principles of planning and design. In: Proceedings of the 8th ICID international drainage workshop, New Delhi, vol IV. ICID, New Delhi, pp 17–32Google Scholar
  42. Kazmi HA, Naorem AD (1987) Planning and implementation of land drainage projects in India. In: Proceedings 3rd international workshop on land drainage, Columbus, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  43. Khanzada AN, Morris JD, Ansari R, Slavich PG, Collopy JJ (1998) Groundwater uptake and sustainability of Acacia and Prosopis plantations in southern Pakistan. Agric Water Manag 36:121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lal C (2005) Develop design criteria of interceptor drain for preventing/minimizing water logging in areas along major canals. Progress during 2004–05 (Personal communication)Google Scholar
  45. Lee TS, Chandio AS, Mirjat MS (2013) Simulation of horizontal and vertical drainage systems to combat waterlogging problem along the Rohri canal in Khairpur district, Pakistan. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 139(9):710–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Madramootoo CA, Ochs WJ (1997) General report for the seventh ICID international drainage workshop “Drainage for the 21st Century” – In: Proceedings, vol 1, Penang, Malaysia. http//
  47. Manjunatha MV, Hebbara M, Patil SG, Kuligod VB, Minhas PS (2000) Effect of tree plantation in control of canal seepage and shallow water table in saline Vertisols. National Seminar Environmental Pollution and Management, DharwadGoogle Scholar
  48. Manjunatha MV, Oosterbaan RJ, Gupta SK, Rajkumar H, Jansen H (2004) Performance of subsurface drains for reclaiming waterlogged saline lands under rolling topography in Tungabhadra irrigation project in India. Agric Water Manag 69:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mathew EK (2003) Adaptability constraints of a technically and economically feasible subsurface drainage system in the low-lying acid sulphate soils of Kerala, India. Paper no 116. 9th international drainage workshop, Utrecht, The Netherlands, September 10–13, 2003Google Scholar
  50. McKinney DC (1996) Sustainable water management in the Aral Sea Basin. Water resources update, no. 102, pp 14–24Google Scholar
  51. Mohan Lal (2011) Impact of subsurface drainage on land quality, groundwater quality and crops yield in Haryana. Ph. D. dissertation submitted to National Institute of Technology, KurukshetraGoogle Scholar
  52. Mondal AK, Obi Reddy GP, Ravisankar T (2011) Digital database of salt affected soils in India using Geographic Information System. J Soil Salinity Water Qual 3:16–29Google Scholar
  53. Mundorff MJ, Lateef MA (1963) Relation of groundwater withdrawals and the decline in water table in SCARP-1, Rechna Doab: West Pakistan Water and Power Devel. Authority, Water and Soils Investigation Division of Technology Paper 5, 13 pGoogle Scholar
  54. Nijland HJ (2000) Drainage along the River Nile. Ministry of Public Works and Water Resources, Egypt and Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Netherlands, 310pGoogle Scholar
  55. Noseko PP, Zonn IS (1976) Land drainage in the world. ICID Bull 25:65–70Google Scholar
  56. NRCS (2003) Conservation practice standard-mole drains. Code 482-1. Natural resources Conservation Service. USDA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Oster JD, Macedo TF, Davis D, Fulton A (1999) Developing sustainable reuse and disposal of saline drain water on eucalyptus. Department of Environmental Sciences, UC Cooperative Extension, University of California, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  58. Patil BN, Patil SG, Hebbara M, Manjunatha MV, Gupta RK, Minhas PS (2005) Bio-ameliorative role of tree species in salt-affected Vertisols of India. J Trop For Sci 17:346–354Google Scholar
  59. Qureshi RH, Barrett-Lennard EG (1998) Saline agriculture for irrigated land in Pakistan: a handbook. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra. 142 pGoogle Scholar
  60. RAJAD (1995) Analysis of subsurface drainage design criteria. Chambal Command Area Development and Canadian International Development Agency, KotaGoogle Scholar
  61. Ram Sewa, Rao KVGK, Visvanatha NA (2000) Impact of subsurface drainage in management of saline soils of the Chambal command. 8th ICID international drainage workshop, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  62. Rao KVGK, Singh OP, Gupta RK, Kamra SK, Pandey RS, Kumbhare PS, Abrol IP (1986) Drainage investigations for salinity control in Haryana, Bulletin no. 10. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal. 95 pGoogle Scholar
  63. Ritzema H (ed) (1994) Drainage principles and applications. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen. 1125 pGoogle Scholar
  64. Ritzema H, Wolters W, Bhutta M, Gupta SK, Safwat A-D (2007) The added value of research on drainage in irrigated agriculture. Irrig Drain 56:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robertson RW (2005) Land drainage in the 14th century B.C. Environmental Science & Engineering, Ontario, Canada.
  66. Scheumann W, Freisem C (2002) The role of drainage for sustainable agriculture. J Appl Irrig Sci 37(1):33–61Google Scholar
  67. Schwab G, Maheswari KM, Gupta SK, Johri GB (eds) (1987) Handbook for drainage of irrigated areas in India, Technical report no. 5. IMTP (LBII and WAPCO), New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  68. Sethi M, Sharma BD, Kumar R, Lal K, Gupta SK (2004) Prognosis of critical areas prone to secondary soil salinization through remote sensing: final report NATP project. NATP, ICAR, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  69. Sharma DP, Gupta SK (2005) Subsurface drainage for reversing degradation of waterlogged saline lands. Land Degrad Dev 17(6):605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Singh R, Ramana Rao KV (2014) Agricultural drainage technologies for temporary waterlogged Vertisols. In: Gupta SK (ed) Agricultural land drainage in India. Agrotech Publishing Academy, Udaipur, pp 207–225Google Scholar
  71. Smedema LK (2000) Global drainage needs and challenges – the role of drainage in today’s world. 8th international drainage workshop, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  72. Stirzaker RJ, Cook FJ, Knight JH (1997) How to space trees in a paddock for control of dry land salinity: a first approximation. In: Proceedings of workshop on agroforestry for sustainable land-use: fundamental research and modelling, temperate and Mediterranean applications, Montepellier, pp 169–173Google Scholar
  73. Stirzaker RJ, Cook FJ, Knight JH (1999) Where to plant trees on cropping land for control of dry land salinity: some approximate solution. Agric Water Manag 39:115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. TERI (1997) Looking back to rethink ahead. Green India 2047. Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi. 350 pGoogle Scholar
  75. Umali DL (1993) Irrigation induced salinity- a growing problem for development and the environment. World Bank paper no 215, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  76. USBR (1978) Drainage manual. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, GPO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  77. Vinogradov S (1996) Transboundary water resources in the former Soviet Union: between conflict and cooperation. Nat Resour J 393:406–412Google Scholar
  78. Weaver MM (1964) History of tile drainage. Weaver, New York, 343 pGoogle Scholar
  79. WRI (World Resources Institute) (2000) World resources 2000–2001, Part II taking stock of ecosystems, Washington, DC, USA.

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Soil Salinity Research InstituteKarnalIndia

Personalised recommendations