Advertisement

Net Neutrality

  • Murali Krishna Medudula
  • Mahim Sagar
  • Ravi Parkash Gandhi
Chapter

Abstract

A neutral Internet has assumed great importance in the modern public policy discourse and is the focus of a highly emotional debate in many nations. At the heart of the issue lies the concern that bottleneck control of the retail market would allow Internet service providers to discriminate against edge providers by either blocking or slowing down access to edge services over their networks.

Keywords

Price Discrimination Content Provider Internet Service Provider Defense Advance Research Project Agency Neutrality Regulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Becker GS, Carlton DW, Sider HS (2010) Net neutrality and consumer welfare. J Compet Law Econ 6(3):497–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crowcroft J (2007) Net neutrality: the technical side of the debate—a white paper. Int J Commun 567–579Google Scholar
  3. FCC (2010) Open internet order. Available at: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.pdf. Accessed 8 Jul 2014
  4. Hahn R, Wallsten S (2006) The economics of net neutrality. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory StudiesGoogle Scholar
  5. Hass DA (2007) The never-was-neutral net and why informed end users can end the net neutrality debates. Berkeley Technol Law J 22(4):1565–1635Google Scholar
  6. Information Sciences Institute (1981) RFC 791: DARPA internet program protocol specification 11. In: Postel J (ed) Available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791
  7. Jamison MA, Hauge JA (2008) Getting what you pay for: analyzing the net neutrality debateGoogle Scholar
  8. Kathleen Nichols et al, IEFT Network Working Group, Request for Comments 2474: Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS field) In the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers (1998) Available at https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2474.txt
  9. Kumar VP, Laksman TV, Stiliadis D (1998) Beyond best effort: router architectures for the differentiated services of tomorrow’s internet. IEEE Commun Mag, 152–164Google Scholar
  10. Layton R (2013) Net neutrality in the Netherlands: Dutch solution or Dutch disease? In Proceedings of 24th European regional conference of the international telecommunication society, Florence, Italy, October 20–23, 2013Google Scholar
  11. Lee RS, Wu T (2009) Subsidizing creativity through network design: zero-pricing and net neutrality. J Econ Perspect 23(3):61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Njoroge P, Ozdaglar A, Stier-Moses NE, Weintraub GY (2013) Investment in two-sided markets and the net neutrality debate. Review of Network Economics 12(4):355–402Google Scholar
  13. Owen BM (2007) Antecedents to net neutrality. Regulation 30(3):14–17Google Scholar
  14. Saltzer JH et al (1984) End-to-end arguments in system design. ACM Trans Comput Syst 2:277. Available at: http://web.mit.edu/saltzer/www/publications/endtoend/endtoend.pdf
  15. Section three of the US federal Act to Regulate Commerce (February 4, 1887, c. 104, 24 Stat. 379, 380)Google Scholar
  16. Steven Blake et al, IETF Network Working Group, Request for Comments 2475: An Architecture for Differentiated Services (1998) [hereinafter RFC2475]. Available at https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2475.txt
  17. Weisman DL, Kulick RB (2010) Price discrimination, two-sided markets and net neutrality regulation. Tulane J Technol Intellect Prop 13:81Google Scholar
  18. Wu Tim (2003) Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. J Telecommun High Technol Law 2:79–141Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murali Krishna Medudula
    • 1
  • Mahim Sagar
    • 1
  • Ravi Parkash Gandhi
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations