Modeling and Simulation of a Near Omni-Directional Hexapod Robot

Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The present paper describes design and modelling aspects of a near omni-directional legged-wheel robot. While discussing the importance of twin frame legged robots with wheels in mobile robotic research, the basic geometrical configuration of the system was presented. The kinematic and dynamic analysis of the system facilitated improved overall design of the robot. Results of virtual simulation of the movement of this hybrid legged wheel system are also presented. An experimental lab-scale prototype has been developed and simulation results are compared with the test results to ascertain the technical feasibility of geometric model with respect to the mobility on different terrains.


Bottom Plate Gait Pattern Home Position Hexapod Robot Bottom Frame 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Dutta, S., Ray, R., & Banerji, D. (2007). Development of autonomous mobile robot with manipulator for manufacturing environment. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology, 38, 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fielding, M. R., & Reg Dunlop, G. (2004). Omnidirectional hexapod walking and efficient gaits using restrictedness. International Journal of Robotics Research, 23, 1105–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fujii, S., Inoue, K., Takubo, T., & Arai, T. (2006). Climbing up onto steps for limb mechanism robot “asterisk”. In Proceedings International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (pp. 225–230).Google Scholar
  4. Fukudaa, T., Adachib, Y., Hoshinoc, H., Matsunagad, I., & Arai, F. (1995). An omni-directional six-legged walking robot. Advanced Robotics, 9(2), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gurocak, H. B., & Peabody, J. (1998). Design of a robot that walks in any direction. Journal of Robotic Systems, 15(2), 75–83.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Koyachi, N., Adachi, H., Nakamura, T., & Nakano, E. (1990). Terrain following control of self-contained semi-fixed gait hexapod walking robot. In Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Confernce on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 309–314).Google Scholar
  7. Krishna, M., Bares, J. E., & Mutschler, E. (1997). Tethering system design for Dante II. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 1100–1105).Google Scholar
  8. Ma, S., Tomiyama, T., & Wada, H. (2005). Omnidirectional static walking of a quadruped robot. IEEE Transaction of Robotics, 21(2), 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ota, Y., Yoneda, K., Ito, F., Hirose, S., & Inagaki, Y. (2001). Design and control of 6-dof mechanism for twin-frame mobile robot. Autonomous Robots, 10(3), 297–316.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Sakagami, Y., et al. (2002). The intelligent asimo: System overview and integration. In Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 2478–2483).Google Scholar
  11. Tsumaki, T. (1993). Development of practical hexapod walking robot. Proceedings JRSJ International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics, 93(4), 336–339.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical & Building SciencesVellore Institute of TechnologyVelloreIndia
  2. 2.Robotics & Automation LabCSIR-CMERIDurgapurIndia

Personalised recommendations