The Strategic Importance of Knowledge Transfer in VOs

  • Sandhya Shekhar
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


The process of knowledge transfer has been recognized as being critical to organizational performance. It becomes even more important in the context of virtual or dispersed organizations, where the process of transfer is more complex because of distances. However, most organizations do not appear to have a scientific mechanism to measure knowledge transfer effectiveness. This chapter starts from first principles by lending conceptual clarity to knowledge and knowledge transfer. It navigates through multiple interpretations to understand how knowledge transfer can be deemed to be successful and how organizations are assessing its effectiveness. It examines existing approaches to studying knowledge transfer outcomes. This reveals that there appears to be no commonly accepted approach to measuring knowledge transfer effectiveness. It also highlights the need to understand the inherent dimensionalities to derive a diagnostic view of the transfer process, rather than viewing it as a cumulative measure at the end of the process. The lacunae in existing approaches are enumerated, and the guiding parameters for determining the dimensionalities of knowledge transfer in a dispersed organizational setting are identified. A model for measuring knowledge transfer effectiveness is evolved using a two-step approach. The first step develops a generic model for measuring transfer effectiveness by identifying the implicit dimensions from a process perspective. The sub-processes covering both the supply and demand facets are taken into account to provide a more holistic view of the transfer process. In the second step, this model is expanded to accommodate the dimensions that arise out of geographic dispersion of the entities involved in the transfer. This also forms the conceptual model based on which detailed empirical research is done later. Finally it discusses the uses of such a diagnostic tool and describes how it can be customized in the context of different manifestations of VOs.


Knowledge Transfer Project Team Current Location Distant Location Knowledge Worker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Davenport T, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J Int Bus Stud 24(Fourth Quarter):625–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):150–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(10):27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bosch-Sijtsema P (2002) A structure of roles within virtual organizations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 1(3):371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Syed-lkhsan SOS, Rowland F (2004) Knowledge management in a public organization: a study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer. J Knowl Manag 8:96–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simons PRJ (1999) Transfer of learning: paradoxes for learners. Int J Educ Res 31:577–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daghfous A (2004) Organizational learning, knowledge and technology transfer: a case study. Learn Organ 11(1):67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ko D-G, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Q 29(1):59–85Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bresman H, Birkinshaw J, Nobel R (1999) Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. J Int Bus Stud 30(3):439–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Szulanski G (2004) Imperfection, transfer failure and the replication of knowledge. J Manage Enq 13(2):141–150Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segars AH (2001) Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18(1):185–214Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandhya Shekhar
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge and Innovation StrategiesChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations