Skip to main content

Implementation of Data Analytics for MongoDB Using Trigger Utility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence in Data Mining—Volume 1

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 410))

  • 1086 Accesses

Abstract

SQL based traditional databases like Oracle; SQL server offers the capability to develop programs like Trigger. Trigger is a very important feature provided by many databases, especially useful in monitoring, rule enforcement, data validation and data analytics etc. MongoDB is non SQL document oriented database. MongoDB is the fastest growing and most demanding non SQL database. Since MongoDB primarily is operated using its out of box tools like mongo, mongos, bsondump, mongod, mongoexport and Java script function. MongoDB does not provide in-built feature for triggers which is very efficient in data analytics, monitoring and reporting purpose. Paper presents two utility in which one utility is a listener or poller utility which is developed to give similar feature like trigger and after that second utility is developed which gives historical data analytic capability on Mongo database by using the trigger utility. It pulls the data from analytic collection and generates the graph. Data analytic tools plays vital role in decision making in today’s complex business environment where data size is very huge and unstructured by nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chang, F., Dean, J., Ghemawat, S., Hsieh, W., Burrows, M., Chandra, T., Andrew Fikes, A., Gruber, R.: Bigtable: a distributed storage system for structured data OSDI’06. In: Seventh Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation, Seattle, WA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Han, J., Le, G.: Survey on NoSQL database in IEEE (2011). 978-1-4577-0208-2

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abouzeid, A.: Hadoop DB: an architectural hybrid of mapreduce and DBMS technologies for analytical workloads. In: Proceedings of the VLDB End

    Google Scholar 

  4. Levitt, N.: Will NoSQL databases live up to their promise. IEEE Comput. Soc. 43(2), 922–933 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Han, I., Haihong, E., Le, G., Du, J.: Survey on NoSQL database. In: 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Applications, pp. 363–366 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Padhy, R., Patra, M., Satapathy, S.: RDBMS to NoSQL: Reviewing some next-generation non-relational database’s. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Technol. 11(1), 015–030 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rutishauser, N.: TPC-H applied to MongoDB: how a NoSQL database performs supervised by Prof. Dr. Michael B¨ohlen. Amr Noureldin 349 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeCandia, G., Hastorun, D., Jampani, M.: Dynamo: amazon’s highly available key-value store. SOSP’07. Stevenson, Washington, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tudorica, B., Bucur, C.: A comparison between several NoSQL databases with comments and notes. In: Roedunet International Conference (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kanade, A., Gopal, A.: An experimental study on open source RDBMS FDI issues and prospects. In: National Conference, pp. 203–206 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hecht, R., Jablinski, S.: NoSQL evaluation a use case oriented survey. In: Proceedings International Conference on Cloud and Service Computing, pp. 12–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adam, L., Jakob Mattson, J.: Investigating storage solutions for large data: a comparison of well performing and scalable data storage solutions for real time extraction and batch insertion of data (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, H., Dasdan, A., Hsiao, R., Parker, D.: Map-reduce-merge: simplified relational data processing on large clusters. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD ‘07), pp. 1029–1040. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Veen, J., Waaij, B., Meijer, R.: Sensor data storage performance: SQL or NoSQL. In: Physical or Virtual Fifth International Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 431–438. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders, G., Shin, S.: Denormalization effects on performance of RDBMS. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cruz, F., J. Pereira, J., Oliveira, R.: An effective scalable SQL engine for NoSQL databases in distributed applications and interoperable systems, pp. 155–168. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Calil, A., Mello, R.: SimpleSQL: a relational layer for SimpleDB in ADBIS, pp. 99–110 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stonebraker, M.: SQL databases v. NoSQL databases. Commun. ACM 53(4), 10–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roijackers, J., Fletcher, L.H.G.: On bridging relational and document-centric data stores in BNCOD, pp. 135–148 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hacigumus, H., Tatemura, J., PHsiung, W., Moon, H., Chi, Y.: CloudDB: one size fits all revived in services, pp. 148–149 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ameri, P., Grabowski, U., Meyer, J., Streit, A.: On the application and performance of MongoDB for climate satellite data. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications in IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, S., Jiang, S., Ooi, B., Tan, K.: Distributed online aggregations. In: Proceedings VLDB, pp. 443–454 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pavlo, A.: A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, pp. 165–178 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Padhy, R., Patra, M., Satapathy, S.: RDBMS to NoSQL: reviewing some next-generation non-relational database’s. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Technol. 11(1), 015–030 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Banker, K.: MongoDB in action (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang, S., Cai, L., Liu, Z., Hu, Y.: Non-structure data storage technology: a discussion computer and information science (ICIS), pp. 482–487 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tauro, C.S.A.: Comparative study of the new generation, agile, scalable, high performance NOSQL database. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 48(20), Commun. ACM, 25(4), 0975–888 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chitra, K., Jeevarani, B.: Study on basically available, scalable and eventually consistent NOSQL databases. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 3(7) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mohan, B., Govardhan, A.: Online aggregation using MapReduce in MongoDB. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 3(9) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dede, E., Govindraju, M.: Performance evaluation of a MongoDB and Hadoop platform for scientific data analysis. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Scientific Cloud Computing (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khan, S., Mane, V.: SQL support over MongoDB using metadata. Int. J. Sci. Res. Public. 3(10) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Jin, Y.: Research on the improvement of MongoDB auto-sharding in cloud environment in computer science and education (ICCSE), pp. 851–854 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Boicea, A., Radulescu, F., Agapin, L.: MongoDB vs Oracle: database comparison. In: Third International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao, G., Huang, W., Liang, S., Tang1, Y.: Modeling MongoDB with relational model. In: Fourth International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kanade, A., Gopal, A., Kanade, S.: A study of normalization and embedding in MongoDB in IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Murugesan, P., Ray, I.: Audit log management in MongoDB. In: IEEE 10th World Congress on Services (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xinwei, J., Guicheng, S.: Managing RFID data in MongoDB Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA) in IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dwivedi, K., Dubey S.K.: Analytical review on Hadoop distributed files system. In: Proceeding of 5th International Conference on the Next Generation Information Technology Summit (Confluence), pp. 174–181. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Parker, Z., Poe, S., Vrbsky, S.: Comparing NoSQL MongoDB to an SQL DB. In: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Southeast Conference (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Abramova, V., Bernardino, J.: NoSQL Databases: MongoDB vs. Cassandra. In: Proceedings of the International C* Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalpana Dwivedi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dwivedi, K., Dubey, S.K. (2016). Implementation of Data Analytics for MongoDB Using Trigger Utility. In: Behera, H., Mohapatra, D. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Data Mining—Volume 1. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 410. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2734-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2734-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2732-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2734-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics