Skip to main content

Improving Protein Density in Food Legumes Through Agronomic Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1715 Accesses

Abstract

Agronomic biofortification is the easiest and fastest way for biofortification of cereals and pulses with Fe, Zn or other micromineral nutrients especially in developing Asian and African countries, where these are considered as the staple food. Agronomic biofortification is the only way to reach the poorest of the poor rural masses, those who will never have money to buy mineral supplements nor can afford to improve the components of their diet by incorporating animal products. It is suggested by scientific evidences that biofortification is feasible technically and even it can be achievable without negotiating for agronomic productivity. Cost–benefit analyses that are predicted also do support biofortification as being imperative in the armamentarium for monitoring micronutrient deficiencies and its control. However, the pertinent challenges facing all of us are about the accessibility of biofortified crop in large scale with proven purity and quality standards and to get producers/consumers acceptance for such biofortified crops and increase their intake. With the inception of good seed production and utilisation systems, the development of markets and market-oriented products and creation of demand for these, the commercial exploitation of crops with nutrient fortification can be possible and achievable. Amongst different types of malnutrition, protein malnutrition is the foremost one as it plays the pivotal role in health and nutrition of both human and animals. Besides protein malnutrition, deficiencies due to vitamin A, iron and zinc do affect over half of the population of the world. Although ample progress has been achieved to control these deficiencies through food fortification and supplementation, yet renewed and vigorous approaches are needed, especially to reach a sizeable mass of rural poor. It is true especially for reaching the Millennium Development Goals (now, Sustainable Development Goals)that aims at reducing by at least two-thirds the under-five child mortality ratio and three-quarters the maternal mortality ratio by 2020. Therefore, biofortification of staple food crops including food legumes is a new public health approach to contain protein (and of course deficiencies of vitamin A, iron and zinc) in poor countries. This chapter gives a brief insight of the technology for improving protein density in food or seed legumes through agronomic interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bouis HE (2003) Micronutrient fortification of plants through plant breeding: can it improve nutrition in man at low cost? Proc Nutr Soc 62:403–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakmak I, Kalayc M, Ekiz H, Braun HJ, Kilinc Y, Yilmaz A (1990) Zinc deficiency as a practical problem in plant and human nutrition in Turkey: a NATO-science for stability project. Field Crop Res 60:175–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey R, Domoney C, Ellis N (1986) Legume storage proteins and their genes. Oxf Surv Plant Mol Cell Biol 3:1–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casey R, Davies DR, Casey R, Domoney C, Smith AM (1993) Biochemistry and molecular biology of seed products. In: Casey R, Davies DR (eds) Peas: genetics, molecular biology and biotechnology. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 141–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary AK, Thakur RC, Kumar N (2008) Effect of integrated nutrient management on soil physical and hydraulic properties in rice–wheat crop sequence in NW Himalayas. Indian J Soil Conser 36:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Crevieu I, Carre B, Chagneau A-M, Quillien L, Gueguen J, Berot S (1997) Identification of resistant pea (Pisum sativum L.) proteins in the digestive tract of chickens. J Agric Food Chem 45:1295–1300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande SS (1992) Food legumes in human nutrition. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 32:333–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domoney C, Welham T, Ellis N, Mozzanega P, Turner L (2002) Three classes of proteinase inhibitor gene have distinct but overlapping patterns of expression in Pisum sativum plants. Plant Mol Biol 48:319–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Clark RB (2002) Micronutrients in crop production. Adv Agron 77:185–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forster C, North H, Afzal N, Domoney C, Hornostaj A, Robinson DS, Casey R (1999) Molecular analysis of a null mutant for pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed lipoxygenase-2. Plant Mol Biol 39:1209–1220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham RD, Welch RM (1996) Breeding for staple-food crops with high micronutrient density: agricultural strategies for micronutrients. Working paper no 3, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham RD, Senadhira D, Beebe SE, Iglesias C, Ortiz-Monasterio I (1999) Breeding for micronutrient density in edible portions of staple food crops: conventional approaches. Field Crop Res 60:57–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham R, Welch R, Bouis H (2001) Addressing micronutrient malnutrition through the nutritional quality of staple foods: principles, perspectives, and knowledge gaps. Adv Agron 70:77–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grusak MA (2002) Enhancing mineral content in plant food products. J Am Coll Nutr 21:178S–183S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedemann MS, Welham T, Boisen S, Canibe N, Bilham L, Domoney C (1999) Studies on the biological responses of rats to seed trypsin inhibitors using near-isogenic lines of Pisum sativum L (pea). J Sci Food Agric 79:1647–1653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking PJ, Pate JS (1977) Mobilization of minerals to developing seeds of legumes. Ann Bot 41:1259–1278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IIPR (2009) 25 years of pulses research at IIPR. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, pp 1–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Jat SL, Shivay YS, Parihar CM, Meena HN (2012) Evaluation of summer legumes for their economic feasibility, nutrient accumulation and soil fertility. J Food Legum 25:239–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan HB (2000) Biochemistry and molecular biology of soybean seed storage proteins. J New Seed 2:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masood A, Gupta S (2012) Carrying capacity of Indian agriculture: pulse crops. Curr Sci 102:874–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul J, Choudhary AK, Suri VK, Sharma AK, Kumar V, Shobhna (2014) Bioresource nutrient recycling and its relationship with biofertility indicators of soil health and nutrient dynamics in rice–wheat cropping system. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 45:912–924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pooniya V, Shivay YS (2015) Influence of green manuring and zinc fertilization on quality parameters of Basmati rice. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46:382–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pooniya V, Shivay YS, Rana A, Nain L, Prasanna R (2012) Enhancing soil nutrient dynamics and productivity of Basmati rice through residue incorporation and zinc fertilization. Eur J Agron 41:28–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Praharaj CS (2013) Managing precious water through need based micro-irrigation in a long duration pigeon pea under Indian Plains. In: International conference on policies for water and food security, Cairo, Egypt, 24–26 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Praharaj CS, Dhingra KK (2001) Growth, productivity and BNF in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) under Bradyrhizobium inoculation, pendimethalin and nitrogen schedules and their residual effect on succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop. Indian J Agron 46:635–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Praharaj CS, Sankaranarayanan K, Kumar N, Singh KK, Tripathi AK (2011) Low-input technologies for increasing crop productivity and sustainability. Curr Adv Agric Sci 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Praharaj CS, Sankaranarayanan K, Singh KK, Tripathi AK (2013) Village group approach for enhanced prosperity and livelihood security through conservation of resources – an overview. Curr Adv Agric Sci 5:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Praharaj CS, Singh U, Hazra K (2014) Technological interventions for strategic management of water for conserving natural resources. In: 6th world congress on conservation agriculture, Winnipeg, Canada, 22–26 June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R, Shivay YS, Kumar D (2014) Agronomic biofortification of cereal grains with iron and zinc. Adv Agron 125:55–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana A, Joshi M, Prasanna R, Shivay YS, Lata N (2012) Biofortification of wheat through inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and cyanobacteria. Eur J Soil Biol 50:118–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaranarayanan K, Praharaj CS, Nalayini P, Gopalakrishnan N (2011) Legume as companion crop for cotton. J Cotton Res Dev 24:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalendra KC, Gummagolmath SP, Patil SM (2013) Role of pulses in the food and nutritional security in India. J Food Legum 26:124–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekhawat K, Shivay YS (2012) Residual effects of nitrogen sources, sulfur and boron levels on mungbean (Vigna radiata) in a sunflower (Helianthus annuus)–mungbean system. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58:765–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Chen JH, Ding SR (2003) Genotypic variation for potassium accumulation and utilization efficiency in barley under rainfed potassium stress conditions. Acta Agron Hung 51:267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Kumar D, Prasad R (2008) Relative efficiency of zinc sulfate and zinc oxide–coated urea in rice–wheat cropping system. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 39:1154–1167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Krogstad T, Singh BR (2010a) Mineralization of copper, manganese and zinc from rock mineral flour and city waste compost for efficient use in organic farming. Plant Soil 326:425–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Prasad R, Rahal A (2010b) Studies on some nutritional quality parameters of organically or conventionally grown wheat. Cereal Res Commun 38:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Prasad R, Pal M (2013) Zinc fortification of oat grains through zinc fertilisation. Agric Res 2:375–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Kumar D, Prasad R, Pal M (2014a) Effect of cosavet fertis WG and bentonite sulphur pellets on growth, yield attributes, productivity and sulphur use efficiency in basmati rice. Indian J Fertil 10:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Prasad R, Pal M (2014b) Effect of zinc fertilisation on grain and protein yield, nitrogen uptake and fertiliser use efficiency in chickpea. Indian J Fertil 10:24–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Prasad R, Pal M (2014c) Effect of variety and zinc application on yield, profitability, protein content and zinc and nitrogen uptake by chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Indian J Agron 59:317–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Shivay YS (2003) Coating of prilled urea with ecofriendly neem (Azadirachta Indica a. juss.) formulations for efficient nitrogen use in hybrid rice. Acta Agron Hung 51:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK, Singh L (2014) Technology adaptability for higher pulses productivity in varied conditions of Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian J App Res 4:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KK, Praharaj CS, Choudhary AK, Kumar N, Venkatesh MS (2011a) Zinc response in pulses. Indian J Fertil 7(10):118–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KK, Praharaj CS, Ghosh PK, Kumar N, Venkatesh MS (2011b) Nutrient management strategies for pulse based production systems in rainfed regions of India. Indian J Fertil 7:50–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav GS, Kumar D, Shivay YS, Singh H (2010) Zinc-enriched urea improves grain yield and quality of aromatic rice. Better Crops 94(2):6–7 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav GS, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Babu S (2013) Enhancing iron density and uptake in grain and straw of aerobic rice through mulching and rhizo-foliar fertilization of iron. Afr J Agric Res 8:5447–5454

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C S Praharaj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Praharaj, C.S., Singh, U., Singh, S.S., Kumar, N. (2016). Improving Protein Density in Food Legumes Through Agronomic Interventions. In: Singh, U., Praharaj, C., Singh, S., Singh, N. (eds) Biofortification of Food Crops. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2716-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics