Wound Care

  • Abraham Mathew


Classification of wounds helps to understand the management of them.


Chronic Wound Acute Wound Wound Care Multidrug Resistant Bacterium Pulse Lavage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Rank BK, Wakefield AR, Hueston JT. Surgery of repair as applied to hand injuries. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1973.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohil RS. Classification of wounds, chapter 5. Sarabhai S, Tiwari VK, editors. Principles and practice of wound care. New Delhi: Jaypee Publishers; 2012. p. 42.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK, O’Connell PR, editors. Bailey and love’s short practice of surgery 25th ed, chapt 3 wound, tissue repair and scars. London: Hodder Arnold; 2008. p. 24.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Sabiston textbook of surgery, the biological basis of modern surgical practice, 18th ed. wound healing chapt 8 fig 8–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sibbald RG, Goodman L, Woo KY, Krasner DL, Smart H, Tariq G, et al. Special considerations in wound bed preparation 2011: an update(c). Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011;24:415–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schultz G, Mozingo D, Romanelli M, et al. Wound healing and TIME; new concepts and scientific applications. Wound Repair Regen. 2005;13(4 Suppl):S1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Percival SL, Hill KE. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(5):647–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolcott RD, Rumbaugh KP. Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time dependent therapeutic window. J Wound Care. 2010;19(8):320–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fernadez R, Griffiths R. Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD003861.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sabapathy SR. Debridement- preparing the wound bed for cover. p. 70, chapter 8. In: Principles and practice of wound care. New Delhi: Jaypee; 2012.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mosti G, Mattaliano V. The debridement of chronic leg ulcers by means of a new, fluidjet-based device. Wounds. 2006;18(8):227–37.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waycaster C, Milne C. Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing. J Med Econ. 2013;16(7):976–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sherman RA. Maggot therapy takes us back to the future of wound care: new and improved maggot therapy for the 21st century. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(2):336–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Armstrong DG, Salas P, Short B, Martin BR, Kimbriel HR, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ. Maggot therapy in “lower-extremity hospice” wound care: fewer amputations and more antibiotic-free days. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95(3):254–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winter GD. Formation of scab and rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jeong HS, et al. Negative-pressure therapy with acetic acid. Archives Plast Surg. 2015;42(1):59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simon A, Traynor K. Medical honey for wound care—still the ‘Latest Resort’? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2009;6(2):165–73. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem175. Epub 2008 Jan 7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meaume S, Téot L. The importance of pain reduction through dressing selection in routine wound management: the MAPP study. J Wound Care. 2004;13(10):409–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryPushpagiri Institute of Medical SciencesTiruvallaIndia

Personalised recommendations