Infection Prevention and Control Policy in Obstetric HDU and ICU

  • Jayam Kannan


Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) remain a major cause of morbidity, mortality and excess healthcare costs. HAI contribute a considerable cost to the healthcare system, as well as to patients and their families with prolonged hospital stays, readmissions and additional diagnostic tests and treatment. Obstetric units are not an exception. Most infections are caused by the microorganisms of the mothers’ vaginal flora. In India, the scenario of high-risk delivery unit (HDU) development is fast catching up and after initiatives, promotion, education and training programmes. There has been stupendous growth in this area but much needs to be done in area of infrastructure, human resource development, protocol, guidelines formation and research which are relevant to Indian circumstances. An acceptable and logistically feasible zero compromise can be made on quality healthcare delivery, yet acceptable guidelines can be adopted for making HDU designing. Guidelines which may be good for both rural and urban areas as also for smaller and tertiary centres which may include teaching and non-teaching institutes are required. The major obstetric indications for admission in tertiary units were septicaemia (35.08 %) [1].


Septic Shock Severe Sepsis Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Hand Hygiene Survive Sepsis Campaign 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Acosta CD, Kurinczuk JJ, Lucas DN, Tuffnell DJ, Sellers S, Knight M, et al. Severe maternal sepsis in the UK, 2011–2012: a national case-control study. PLoS Med. 2014;11(7):e1001672.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mehta R, Mavalankar DV, Ramani KV, Sharma S, Hussein J. Infection control in delivery care units, Gujarat state, India: a needs assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arulkumaran S, Sivanesaratnam V, Chatterjee A, Kumar P. Essentials of obstetrics. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2011. cited 2015 Jan 10. Available from: Scholar
  4. 4.
    EngenderHealth for Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program, Columbia University. Infection Prevention Practices in Emergency Obstetric Care [Internet]. EngenderHealth; 2003. Available from:
  5. 5.
    Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth | introduction | Guidance and guidelines | NICE [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 10]. Available from:
  6. 6.
    Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):165–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Schalkwyk J, Van Eyk N, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Infectious Diseases Committee. Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric procedures. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32(9):878–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 120: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(6):1472–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations